Archive for Saturday, January 10, 2009

Doctors pay to hear parents against vaccines

January 10, 2009

Advertisement

— There are so many parents in this free-spirited, unconventional small town who won’t get their kids vaccinated that federal researchers are paying money just to hear their side of things.

On Saturday, 80 locals will get $50 apiece to talk about their worries over the risks of childhood shots.

“One of the basic tenets of my decision-making is mistrust of the government, a mistrust of the pharmaceutical companies, and mistrust of the big blanket thing that says this is what everybody has to do,” says Tracy Harding, an organic farming consultant and mother of two.

Nationally, a budding movement of parents are getting exemptions from laws requiring children to get vaccinated before attending school. The exemptions are one explanation the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gives for a spike in measles cases. The government recommends as many as 10 vaccines before a child is 6, plus boosters along the way.

Dr. Ben Schwartz, an adviser to the National Vaccine Program, said the meeting in Ashland is one of three where the government is paying average citizens to give their views to inform officials charting the direction of vaccine research for the next five years. A similar meeting was held in Birmingham, Ala., and another is set for Indianapolis.

Ashland, the town of 20,000 on the flanks of the Siskiyou Mountains in southwestern Oregon, has always been different. In the early 20th century, it was on the Chautauqua lecture circuit, and the sulfurous waters of Lithia Springs drew visitors looking for a cure for what ailed them.

Today, it has one of the highest rates in the nation for vaccine exemptions — 28 percent and rising in kindergartens, compared with about 4 percent statewide. One alternative school has 67 percent.

A liberal outpost in a conservative region, Ashland likes to go its own way. The city has its own water and electric utilities, and was a pioneer promoting solar energy, high-speed Internet, and dog parks.

For years, Dr. Jim Shames, a physician who prefers a down vest to a lab coat, has argued the benefits of vaccines with Harding, his next-door neighbor.

As Jackson County’s chief medical officer, Shames would like every child immunized. Ashland always has some whooping cough around, but has seen no spike in measles. Still, Shames fears the community is vulnerable because so many international visitors come to the Oregon Shakespeare Festival and Southern Oregon University.

Until now, Tyre Dawn has depended on organic food and plenty of playtime outdoors to keep her 4-year-old son, Lukyan, healthy. But she is planning to open a preschool in the spring, and with so many children around, she is now rethinking her policy.

“It is essential in these times for everyone to look more closely at the choices they are making,” she said.

Comments

bondmen 6 years, 4 months ago

There are many health professionals with serious questions about government mandated vaccines and a thoughtful parent should make themselves aware of these concerns before the vaccines are forced upon their children. More than good intentions, parents want a good result!http://www.eagleforum.org/topics/vaccine/vaccine.html

jade 6 years, 4 months ago

Who can trust the pharmaceutical companies any more? I lost one friend to an enlarged heart caused by fen-fen. Then there's vioxx, and so many other examples of drugs rushed onto the market because they were profitable, not because they were well-tested, let alone needed. How many drugs do Americans buy because pharmaceutical companies advertise them? Drug reps hawk their wares in doctors' offices with all kinds of goodies provided to doctors, nurses, and staff so that patients will be prescribed whatever chemical cocktail their employer pushes. It's criminal, really, and the FDA has shown itself to be complicit in passing on drugs--think about gardasil here--before anything is known about long-term consequences. And to think Texas made gardasil mandator for little girls...

bondmen 6 years, 4 months ago

Parents concerned for the long term health of their child must be informed and make the correct decisions regarding immunization. Do not be intimidated by so called health care professionals who wish to push needles into your little one too soon. There is a time for vaccination, but not for newborns! Be aware of the risks and the benefits.http://sayingnotovaccines.blogspot.com/

gr 6 years, 4 months ago

"The exemptions are one explanation the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention gives for a spike in measles cases."Why don't they list whether it is with or without the vaccinated ones??"I totally agree with you on stuff like fen-fen & vioxx, but the vacs that a lot of these parents have issues with have long-proven track records and have prevented deadly epidemics for decades."HA!. Really. Give some proof of these track records. Anecdotal global warming type of stuff doesn't cut it.Can anyone give a controlled study showing that vaccinations work?If not, how would one go about designing a study to show the efficiency of vaccines? Hmmmm. Interesting thought, huh?

gr 6 years, 4 months ago

Guess no one could readily present a controlled study. One would think there would be at least something out there to prove those "long-proven track records" which prevent "deadly epidemics for decades”. Think eventually someone will find something?Would vaccinations be a case of, Generally Recognized as Effective? Or would that be, Generally Assumed Effective?

gr 6 years, 4 months ago

Can you imagine all these people frantically digging through research trying to find a controlled study showing the effectiveness of vaccines and as of yet, coming up empty-handed? "Long-proven track records”?Hmmmmmmm.......

Commenting has been disabled for this item.