Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, February 24, 2009

Former planning director ready to jump back into fray

Price Banks, the Lawrence-Douglas County planning director from 1982 to 1994.

Price Banks, the Lawrence-Douglas County planning director from 1982 to 1994.

February 24, 2009

Editor's Note: This is one story in a series profiling the eight candidates running for City Commission.

Advertisement

8 candidates running

The Lawrence City Commission elections are April 7. Eight candidates are vying for three at-large spots on the commission.

The candidates are: Mike Amyx, a downtown barber shop owner; Price Banks, a Lawrence attorney; James Bush, a sales and marketing professional for Maceli’s; Dennis Constance, a custodial supervisor at Kansas University; Aron Cromwell, the owner of a Lawrence-based environmental consulting firm; Lance Johnson, the owner of a Lawrence-based civil engineering firm; Tom Johnson, the student adviser and general manager of KJHK, a KU radio station; and Gwen Klingenberg, president of the Lawrence Association of Neighborhoods.





Price Banks

Age: 65 Address: 2018 Camel Back Family: Wife, Marge; two grown children Occupation: Attorney Substantial business interests: Owner of the business operations of the Price T. Banks Law Firm. He lists the firm’s largest clients as: The Douglas County Kaw Drainage District, the City of Winchester, the Lawrence Community Shelter, Wolfe Properties LLC, and Manhattan Citizens for Sustainable Development Downtown.

Price Banks has the scars to show from what some have called the most unpopular job in Lawrence City Hall.

As the city’s director of planning from 1982 to 1994, he had withstood the slings and arrows that flew frequently in the 1980s when developers wanted to convert major parts of downtown into an indoor mall.

He’d seen the passion of eagle lovers and environmentalists who chained themselves to trees to protest construction of an outlet mall on the banks of the Kansas River.

And he had endured all the guff from developers and neighborhood leaders alike who invariably believed the Planning Department was slanted toward one interest or another.

Today, in a succinct style that he hopes is a hallmark, Banks said the lesson from it all was simple.

“Politics make a difference,” Banks said. “And they always have.”

Fifteen years after leaving City Hall “frustrated,” Banks — now a Lawrence attorney — is diving head-first into the political pool. He’s one of eight candidates seeking three at-large seats on the Lawrence City Commission.

He’s running a campaign that he said he hopes doesn’t sound “too trite,” by saying his familiarity with city government will allow him to “hit the ground running.” The theme plays well with his campaign talk of not getting bogged down in the decision-making process at City Hall.

“Sometimes we beat issues to death when the answer is before us,” Banks said of his observation of city government. “That is one reason we have so many meetings and they last so long. I don’t know if it is a lack of courage or what, but sometimes it is just time to make up your mind and move on.”

A City Hall presence

Banks, 65, resigned as planning director in 1994 shortly after the city approved plans for a new SuperTarget store on South Iowa Street. He said the timing wasn’t entirely coincidental.

“There was some successful pressure to do some things on South Iowa that were different than what our plans recommended,” Banks said. “Those were difficult times. We weren’t successful in planning that area as well as I think we should have.”

So Banks — who thinks South Iowa retail has become a “de facto mall” with poor traffic flow — left City Hall. As he left — with a severance package — some folks jeered him as an obstructionist and some praised him as a forward thinker.

Banks, though, didn’t leave the city. He had earned a law degree in 1982 while working as a county administrator in his native Michigan. In Lawrence, he put it to use for the first time in private practice, starting a law firm that would help people navigate the “bureaucracy of City Hall.”

Over the years, that included a couple of lawsuits suing the city over land-use issues on behalf of clients. It also has involved numerous trips to the City Hall lectern to lobby for everything from a permit to demolish a rundown home to turning off overly bright street lights near his home along Kasold Drive.

And some would say it also has involved a few uncomfortable moments. Banks doesn’t deny that sometimes he’s engaged in some slightly pointed back-and-forth moments with city staff members.

Part of that, he said, is an offshoot of his personality, which tends to be direct.

“I’m kind of an introvert,” Banks said. “If you can say something in 20 words, you ought not to use a thousand.”

Banks said he wouldn’t have a problem working with anyone at City Hall as a commissioner.

He also said if he is elected to the commission, he will cease doing land-use work for clients in Lawrence to avoid any potential conflicts of interest.

“I wouldn’t be suing the city anymore,” Banks said.

The issues

Banks has stressed improving Lawrence’s quality of life factors as a way to attract new businesses to the community. He said the city has let its public image slip some over the years.

“I don’t think we have the curb appeal that we did 20 years ago,” Banks said.

Part of that is due to deteriorating infrastructure such as “crumbling streets and missing sidewalks.” But he also said new development in the community hasn’t always produced the best image.

“We don’t have the curb appeal that we used to in our commercial districts,” Banks said. “Newer commercial districts simply are a duplicate of what occurs all over the country.”

On other issues, Banks said:

• He wouldn’t support raising the city’s property tax mill levy rate to fund projected gaps in the city budget. Instead he would look to defer city equipment purchases, and would look to cut City Hall jobs through attrition.

• He thinks the city needs to do a better job of long-range planning, and is disappointed with Horizon 2020, the city’s comprehensive plan.

“It doesn’t give you any solid vision about what the community ought to look like,” Banks said.

Comments

hawkperchedatriverfront 5 years, 1 month ago

beobachter, we may or may not agree but this is one time. Having an attorney as a Planning Director in my opinion is the worst possible scenario.

The city had the opportunity 25 years ago to streamline applications for buidling, zoning regualations, demolition permits, uses allowed in zoning classifications. It is so convoluted now at City Hall, to get anything done. They must have a meet and greet with you on an issue in Planning. Then go back and gossip about it to perhaps, someone else who might want to do the same thing.

Then every and each group that pops up in town, has to have their say, all the while consuming more time for the person wanting to do something.

Simply put, no nice gestures come from City Hall, but rather many jesters in the circus juggling obstacles in front of the client. whoever it may be.

Why does it take more than 90 days to get something approved in this town?

Didn't Lawrence learn anything when our local contractors went to Manhattan and Junction city where projects were approved easily. As I recall, the time frame in Manhattan was like 60 days and not more than 90. That's what the guy said when the J/W had an online chat.

Maybe it is time for an online chat with folks from our own planning department? And don't edit out the questions, J/W?

0

beobachter 5 years, 1 month ago

If he was planning director, he has some responsibility for current mess Lawrence is. So why would any thinking person vote for him to do same thing again?

0

hawkperchedatriverfront 5 years, 1 month ago

Well now, isn't this interesting, Mr. Banks has received compensation from the Drop In Center.

I understand your comments "justthefacts: but like most attorneys they tend to drag out the scenario far too long. In my opinion, Lawrence has not been well served thus far having attorneys on the city commission, nor as a City Manger. They have rather distorted way of analyzing the situation. They study it for too long.

0

coldplay 5 years, 1 month ago

this guy got his panties in a wad because of Target?

seems like someone this city DOES NOT need as we move FORWARD in the future.

0

justthefacts 5 years, 1 month ago

Any time I had dealings with Mr. Price he was polite, intelligent, to the point, and honest. We could do worse.

0

Richard Heckler 5 years, 1 month ago

Does anyone know how many tax increases the hidden costs of growth have produced for taxpayers?

Does anyone know whether or not Lawrence taxpayers enjoy paying for these hidden costs?

It certainly does seem like a lot Lawrence residents just never question the cost of growth as if it all comes for free.

The talk should not as simple as promoting pro- expensive,tax increasing sprawl like physical growth that Lawrence is now indulging. The talk should be about practical methodical fiscal growth.

Physical growth will always be a municipal concern, but it should NOT be the sole priority.

Do people like Lawrence because city government is trying be like the places they left behind? Of course not.

If fiscal growth growth is the whole point of the exercise, we allow physical growth to put at risk the quality of life that is a vital part of Lawrence's long-term health and prosperity. The object should not be JOCO, Topeka or the biggest city - it’s to be the best. And the best can be achieved and maintained without that so called big city stuff aka sprawling physical growth.

0

Chris Golledge 5 years, 1 month ago

I don't know Banks, and I'm sure the city planning hasn't been perfect, but...

Whenever family comes in from out of town they admire the way that this city has managed to keep the downtown alive.

I, myself, wondered if the 4-lanes out west, like Wakarusa, were justified when they first went in, but there doesn't seem to be any question that they are a good thing now.

So, the planners are getting some things right.

0

OldEnuf2BYurDad 5 years, 1 month ago

"he will cease doing land-use work for clients in Lawrence to avoid any potential conflicts of interest"

What's he going to do for a living? He's only done one kind of work.

0

Michael Capra 5 years, 1 month ago

so price banks was fired from city hall thats funny

0

hawkperchedatriverfront 5 years, 1 month ago

Mr. Banks, politics is not what we need in Lawrence. That is why the city is where it is.

Simplify the Planning Department. Simplify the applications for permits, zoning all of it.

Joseph would never have been able to build a manager in this town.

I still am certain that if a former planning director, an attorney, cannot get a house torn down for a client, what would be his position on the commission. How would his positon on the commission be any different?

Why wait for attrition, reduce, reorganize and re invent from the first day in office.

0

Chris Ogle 5 years, 1 month ago

“Politics make a difference,” Banks said.

Price is right.... come on down..... or up.... anywhere but here in Lawrence.

0

hawkperchedatriverfront 5 years, 1 month ago

Why wait for attrition to reduce city hall?

So which is it about south Iowa, traffic or the retail there?

If he can't get a house torn down for his client, not sure I'd want him on the commission, how would that help anyone else who wants to tear down a property?

AND another lawyer on the commission is not good at any Price.

Scrap 2020. Get busy and rewrite a new plan, the 2050 plan,but in the meantime. reduce staff at city hall, reduce paperwork. Any project in town should be on the ground within 90 days from application.

So far none of the candidates seem to offer any real imaginative ideas.

If Banks and the other candidates want to have a vision of what the community should look like, they need to have a department at City Hall, titled Dozer Bait Real Estate division. Divert some of the city staff from streets to start tearing down houses for folks who want their properties demolished. Get rid of Historic Resources division and reduce paperwork in Planning.

Even Joseph could not have gotten a building permit to build a manger for Mary in this town.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.