Archive for Friday, February 20, 2009

What a mess! Experts ponder space junk problem

This is a computer-generated image provided by the European Space Agency showing an artist impression of catalogued objects in low-Earth orbit viewed over the Equator. Scientists are keeping a close eye on orbital debris created when two communications satellites — one American, the other Russian — smashed into each other Feb. 10 hundreds of miles above Siberia.

This is a computer-generated image provided by the European Space Agency showing an artist impression of catalogued objects in low-Earth orbit viewed over the Equator. Scientists are keeping a close eye on orbital debris created when two communications satellites — one American, the other Russian — smashed into each other Feb. 10 hundreds of miles above Siberia.

February 20, 2009

Advertisement

— Think of it as a galactic garbage dump.

With a recent satellite collision still fresh on minds, participants at a meeting in the Austrian capital this week are discussing ways to deal with space debris — junk that is clogging up the orbit around the Earth.

Some suggest a cosmic cleanup is the way to go. Others say time, energy and funds are better spent on minimizing the likelihood of future crashes by improving information sharing.

The informal discussions on the sidelines of a meeting of the United Nations Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space, which began Feb. 9 and ends today, arose from concern about the collision of a derelict Russian spacecraft and a working U.S. Iridium commercial satellite.

The Feb. 10 incident, which is still under investigation, generated space junk that could circle the Earth and threaten other satellites for the next 10,000 years; it added to the already worrying amount of debris surrounding the planet.

Nicholas L. Johnson, NASA’s chief scientist for orbital debris, said about 19,000 objects are present in the low and high orbit around the Earth — including about 900 satellites, but much of it is just plain junk.

He estimated that included in the 19,000 count are about a thousand objects larger than 4 inches that were created by last week’s satellite collision, in addition to many smaller ones. He predicted that if more junk accumulates, the likelihood of similar collisions — currently very rare — will increase by 2050.

To Johnson, the “true solution” in the long run is to go get the junk — or push it away to a higher altitude before it has time to crash into anything.

“Today’s environment is all right but the environment is going to get worse, therefore I need to start thinking about the future and how can I clean up sometime in the future,” he said.

Johnson is the co-lead of an International Academy of Astronautics study that is exploring ways of extracting space debris from Earth orbit.

Some of the suggestions sound pretty spaced out.

One proposes attaching balloons to pieces of debris to increase their atmospheric drag and bring them back to Earth faster. Another, said Johnson, foresees attaching a 10-mile electrodynamic tether to debris that would generate a current, which then could be controlled from the ground enabling technicians to bring it down.

Many scientists are skeptical about a possible cleanup.

Richard Crowther, the chief British delegate to the meeting, suggested extracting debris from space was costly and risked causing more collisions or explosions that, in turn, would generate more debris.

Crowther, an expert on space debris and so-called Near Earth Objects, suggested it was important to improve information-sharing about the location of objects in orbit to minimize future crashes since each collision creates more debris, further congesting Earth orbit.

“The information to a large extent is out there, but the owners of the data tend to keep the information to themselves,” Crowther said, acknowledging that the U.S. has been “very good” about making its data publicly available.

To Brian Weeden, technical consultant at the nonprofit Secure World Foundation, the ideal scenario would involve the creation of a global network that would funnel data on the whereabouts of space debris into a clearing house for all.

Comments

Omegatron 6 years, 4 months ago

Time to build an orbital garbage truck. Have it dock at the international space station between shifts.

Chris Ogle 6 years, 4 months ago

Many scientists are skeptical about a possible cleanup.

Just tax em... no such thing as a free ride.

Joe Hyde 6 years, 4 months ago

At least for future satellites, what if they carried on-board propulsion rockets and navigation systems that, once the satellite reached the end of its useful life, would automatically bring the satellite down for a total atmospher re-entry burnup? A tidier death than boosting them farther out, using outer space as a sewer.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.