Advertisement

Archive for Wednesday, December 23, 2009

Pain comes long before gain in health care overhaul

December 23, 2009

Advertisement

— Americans will feel the pain before the gain from the health care overhaul Democrats are close to pushing through Congress.

Proposed taxes and fees on upper-income earners, insurers, even tanning parlors, take effect quickly. So would Medicare cuts.

Benefits, such as subsidies for lower middle-income households, consumer protections for all, eliminating the prescription coverage gap for seniors, come gradually.

“There’s going to be an expectations gap, no question about that,” said Drew Altman, president of the nonpartisan Kaiser Family Foundation. “People are going to see their premiums and out-of-pocket costs go up before the tangible benefits kick in.”

Most of the 30 million uninsured helped by the bill won’t get coverage until 2013 at the earliest, well after the next presidential election.

More than two-thirds of Americans get their coverage through large employer plans and their premiums won’t go up because of the legislation, according to number crunchers at the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office.

But Congress can’t abolish medical inflation, so don’t hold your breath waiting for premiums to drop.

For people who buy their own insurance policies — about one of every six Americans — premiums will go up. But that’s for better benefits prescribed under the legislation. And about half of them would get tax credits to substantially lower their costs.

As Senate Democrats cleared the second of three 60-vote procedural hurdles, over unanimous GOP opposition Tuesday, it looked like the White House was already celebrating. “Health care reform is not a matter of if, health care reform now is a matter of when, and I think the president is enormously encouraged by that,” declared spokesman Robert Gibbs.

Republicans, bolstered by opinion polls that show a majority of Americans opposed to the legislation, aimed their fire at dozens of deals Democratic leaders cut to line up the 60 votes needed in the Senate. “Senator so-and-so may have gotten his deal,” said GOP Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky. “But the American people haven’t signed off.”

If the Senate passes the bill Thursday, as now seems likely, the pressure will be on Democrats to quickly sort out House and Senate differences and get final legislation to Obama’s desk. That would end a divisive debate that has soured the public mood.

But there are significant differences between the bills, including stricter abortion language in the House version as well as a government-run insurance plan that is missing from the Senate package. The Senate plan also embraces a tax on high-value insurance plans, something strongly opposed by unions and many House Democrats.

One thing that won’t emerge in the end is a government takeover of health care. The government-run insurance plan some liberals were hoping would be a step to Medicare-for-all lacks support in the Senate. If negotiators put it back, moderate Democrats in the Senate say they’ll oppose the final bill. And Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., needs every one of his party’s 60 votes.

Instead, the final package could end up looking like the Medicare prescription drug benefit, delivered through private insurance companies, but subsidized and regulated by the government.

Just like seniors now pick their drug coverage from a range of private plans, Americans who were previously uninsured would select brand-name coverage through a new kind of insurance supermarket called an exchange. Like seniors today, they would have to pay part of the cost themselves. Most people with employer coverage wouldn’t need to go to the exchange.

The exchanges could be national, regional, or state-based. They’d be up and running in 2013 under the House bill, a year later in the Senate version.

Comments

barrypenders 4 years, 4 months ago

The Poser is the Health welfare guru. He has surrounded himself with business gurus, cabinet appointees, that know the "Free Market" Health business as well. It's "ALL" business with the Poser.

The following is the percentage of each president's cabinet appointees, from the past, who had previously worked in the private sector…..

Buck up!

Roosevelt - 38% Taft - 40% Wilson - 52% Harding - 49% Coolidge - 48% Hoover - 42% FDR - 50% Truman - 50% Eisenhower - 57% Kennedy - 30% LBJ - 47% Nixon - 53% Ford - 42% Carter - 32% Reagan - 56% GHWB - 51% Clinton - 39% GWB - 55% Barack Obama - 8%

That is correct – eight percent. This means that almost all of his cabinet and appointees worked for Universities, Government Agencies, Community Organizations, or other entities receiving government funding.

Stimulus, 8%, and Posercare live unprecedented

Darwin bless us all

0

Thing 4 years, 4 months ago

Pelosi and Reid had better enjoy their moment of power, because after 2010, Reid may be gone and Pelkoosi certainly won't be in a position of power anymore!

0

SettingTheRecordStraight 4 years, 4 months ago

"Gains"? "Protections"? "Benefits"?

None of these exist in this bill. What is the state-run Associated Press thinking?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.