Archive for Saturday, December 12, 2009

Lawsuit threatened over atheist councilman

December 12, 2009

Advertisement

— Asheville City Councilman Cecil Bothwell believes in ending the death penalty, conserving water and reforming government — but he doesn’t believe in God. His political opponents say that’s a sin that makes him unworthy of serving in office, and they’ve got the North Carolina Constitution on their side.

Bothwell’s detractors are threatening to take the city to court for swearing him in, even though the state’s antiquated requirement that officeholders believe in God is unenforceable because it violates the U.S. Constitution.

“The question of whether or not God exists is not particularly interesting to me and it’s certainly not relevant to public office,” the recently elected 59-year-old said.

Bothwell ran this fall on a platform that also included limiting the height of downtown buildings and saving trees in the city’s core, views that appealed to voters in the liberal-leaning community at the foot of the Appalachian Mountains. When Bothwell was sworn into office on Monday, he used an alternative oath that doesn’t require officials to swear on a Bible or reference “Almighty God.”

That riled conservative activists, who cite a little-noticed quirk in North Carolina’s Constitution that disqualifies officeholders “who shall deny the being of Almighty God.” The provision was included when the document was drafted in 1868 and wasn’t revised when the state amended its constitution in 1971. One foe, H.K. Edgerton, is threatening to file a lawsuit in state court against the city to challenge Bothwell’s appointment.

“My father was a Baptist minister. I’m a Christian man. I have problems with people who don’t believe in God,” said Edgerton, a former local NAACP president and founder of Southern Heritage 411, an organization that promotes the interests of black southerners.

Bothwell can’t be forced out of office because the North Carolina provision is unenforceable, according to the supremacy clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Comments

anon1958 5 years, 8 months ago

I suppose this moron Edgerton would prefer that we behave like the perverted princes that rule Saudi Arabia and murder people that have a religious viewpoint different than our own.

(Note: The ruling family are members of the Wahabbi sect an ultraconservative wing of Islam that advocates the murder of all Shia Muslims, and pretty much every other religion. They just especially hate the Shia Muslims and massacre them whenever there is some internal disturbance to cloak their crime.)

tangential_reasoners_anonymous 5 years, 8 months ago

... "a" ... "the" ... ists.

( in-/definite-article-fearing people in a God-fearing world )

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 5 years, 8 months ago

"The ruling family are members of the Wahabbi sect an ultraconservative wing of Islam"

I think it would be more accurate to say they are nominal members of the Wahabi sect, with whom they have a relationship similar to that of medieval European monarchs and the Roman Catholic Church. In other words, it's primarily a means of political control, and not so much about sincere religious belief.

tomatogrower 5 years, 8 months ago

Good grief. Isn't this Elizabeth's Dole state. Do you remember when she accused her opponent of not being Christian, because she dared to talk to atheists? Is North Carolina going to be the radical Christian's experiment in a theocracy, the Christian's dicatotorship?

KansasPerson 5 years, 8 months ago

A black man in the south is trying to declare people ineligible to hold office due to an outdated clause in the state constitution from 1868.

shaking my head to get the irony out

Matt Torres 5 years, 8 months ago

Childish unconstitutional nonsense that should be thrown out quickly and easily. How something unconstitutional got into NC's state constitution I'll never understand. Although I guess our own state does have an unconstitutional marriage definition amendment in it. Whatever.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.