Regents tout higher ed’s value to economy / LJWorld.com

Archive for Tuesday, December 1, 2009

Higher education leaders met Monday to discuss budget woes with the business community. They are hoping to work together to reach common goals.

By Andy Hyland

December 1, 2009

Members of the Kansas Board of Regents highlighted higher education’s connection to financial benefits for the state Monday.

The visit was part of the regents’ statewide tour to promote the value of higher education in the face of state support that continues to dwindle.

Gary Sherrer, regents vice chairman, presented his case to more than 20 members of the local business, city and state legislative communities.

“We’re all in this together,” he said.

He called for an ongoing dialogue between regents and the business community statewide.

But, more than just beginning a discussion, Sherrer called on the business community to make its voice heard — and to ask itself whether it was OK with cuts to an education system that was working for the economy of the state.

The questions from the audience came mostly from business leaders, and seemed mostly receptive to the presentation. Health care industry representatives foretold of a shortage of doctors in the coming years in addition to other presentations, and other business leaders asked more detailed questions about the state funding situation.

Sherrer praised efforts like Kansas University’s quest for National Cancer Institute designation and Kansas State University’s National Bio and Agro-Defense Facility, both of which could have huge impacts on the Kansas economy, and wouldn’t be possible, he said, without higher education.

Sherrer pointed to a higher education program to mitigate a nursing shortage in Kansas that exceeded the Legislature’s goal of new nurses in the state by 75 percent. Now, the state doesn’t have the capacity to address the demand for new nurses, he said.

“When we put the resources in targeted efforts, the results are staggering,” Sherrer said. “Today, in multiple nursing schools across the state, we are telling people who have the ability, ‘No.’”

Sherrer and Reggie Robinson, regents CEO, said that the state is certainly going through an economic recession now, and that the higher education system is willing to do its part to shoulder some cuts. But they noted that the long-term picture, going back 20 years, has trended toward higher tuitions and lower state contributions.

They said they’re educating more students with fewer state dollars, watching total student enrollment grow by 13 percent since 1988 while state funding fell 20 percent.

Sherrer said the regents had to vote down a new program at Pittsburg State University in construction management because of lack of funding.

“You can’t be adding while we’re crushing other stuff,” he said, adding that he asked supporters of the program, “Where’s your voice? It can’t be for this new class. It has to be for the funding of this new class.”

At one point — in response to a question — Robinson said that one of the things he had hoped would come out of these meetings would be a formalized connection between the state and business leaders.

It could come in the form of some kind of advisory panel, the likes of which already exist in many of the institutions overseen by the regents.

Discussion

LJWorld.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

1 December 2009
at 9:21 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

Bob_Keeshan (Anonymous) says…

There can be no meaningful connection between higher education and business leaders as long as the Kansas Chamber of Commerce maintains its actively anti-education positions.

If businesses really wanted to show their support for education they would either use their membership in the KCC to force the organization into policies which mirror that support or they would form a new business organization of their own. For example, the KU Alumni Association pays annual dues to the anti-education Kansas Chamber of Commerce.

As long as the only business advocacy organization in this state is anti-education, the individual voices of business leaders and other groups who pay dues to the KCC don't mean diddly-poo.
1 December 2009
at 12:26 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

KU_cynic (Anonymous) says…

First, talking to business leaders in Lawrence about the need for higher education funding is preaching to the choir. Who with a business in Lawrence wouldn't want more state funds to flow into the community?

Second, if the economic development angle on higher education funding is “the need for trained workers” then why not grow programs that supply skilled graduates in demand — engineers, business majors, science and math teachers, pharmacists, nurses, etc. — and shrink programs that do not — art history, Latin American studies, indigenous peoples studies, seldom-taught language programs, American studies, etc.? Instead, KU and other institutions are threatening to cut or actually cutting valued programs that serve critical needs (math and science teachers, nurses, construction management at Pitt State, etc.).

Divert funds from programs that do not meet critical needs (American studies, etc.) and better fund programs that do (nursing, etc.). That would be responsible leadership.
1 December 2009
at 1:11 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

wastewatcher (Anonymous) says…

Amen to KU cynic above, he is right on target with his/her assessment. The Regents need to manage their assets and not always just ask for more. Why don't they do more to help the Kansas revenue by bringing the football and basketball games played in Missouri back to Kansas? How many tax and economic development dollars are we sending to Missouri? If someone knows, lets hear it.