Opinion

Opinion

A worthy ideological rival

August 28, 2009

Advertisement

Most of my adult life has been intertwined with the Kennedy family. As a freshman at American University in 1960, I stayed up late watching the election returns, as John F. Kennedy barely eked out a victory over Richard Nixon. As with most Americans my age, the decades that followed always involved one or more members of the Kennedy family, whether it was legislation, indiscretions, speeches or just curiosity.

This larger-than-life family has been unique in American politics. But so were the friendships Ted established across the political lines that so easily divide us. He used those personal relationships to accomplish things that mattered to him. Many on the Right hated and demonized him, but I don’t ever recall his responding in kind.

These days, people on “one side” of the political spectrum are not supposed to cooperate, much less have a personal relationship with anyone on the “other side.” Siding with “the enemy” can get you branded a compromiser, a sellout, or worse a fool. While it is true that on too many occasions, conservatives have had their ideological pockets picked by liberals whose favor they curried, that is no excuse for hating people because of their political beliefs.

Kennedy once said in a speech: “I am an American and a Catholic; I love my country and treasure my faith. But I do not assume that my conception of patriotism or policy is invariably correct or that my convictions about religion should command any greater respect than any other faith in this pluralistic society.”

What student or advocate of the First Amendment would disagree with that?

Flaws? Of course he had them in abundance, as we all do, but his, unfortunately, played out on a national and international stage. How would you like to have lived with the daily pressure of knowing that somewhere out there someone may have wanted to kill you as they had your brothers?

I recall a dinner at Ted’s home when he lived in McLean, Va. His sister, the late Eunice Kennedy Shriver, was my dinner partner. He was gracious and funny. He took my wife and me on a tour of a hallway with memorabilia that would delight any political junkie. Five years ago, he showed up at a 20th anniversary party for my syndicated column. When he entered, every head turned in his direction, every jaw dropped. No one could believe that this liberal icon would so honor a conservative friend.

Over the years, I came to see Sen. Kennedy not as a symbol, but as a fellow human being who did not get up each morning seeking ways to harm the country. I know of things he did for the poor and homeless on his own time and in his own way without a press release or a desire for public approval. I know of other hurts and concerns he shared with the very few he could trust about which I would never speak.

Because he came from wealth, he felt a responsibility to give back. We can argue whether government or individuals do that best, but we can’t say that Ted Kennedy was inconsistent. He would compromise to advance his beliefs, not dilute them.

Ted once provided a blurb for a book I wrote. He said, “Cal Thomas usually says the far-right thing instead of the right thing, but I like reading him anyway.”

With the passing of the last of Joseph P. Kennedy Sr.’s sons goes the image of youth and “vigah,” as Jack used to say in his Boston accent. I shall miss Ted Kennedy, not only because he was a worthy ideological rival, but also because with his passing, a part of my youth has gone with him.

Camelot, of course, was a myth, but what young person of that era cannot still hear the line uttered by Richard Burton from that lauded musical? It came at the end of the show as King Arthur surveys his broken kingdom and tells a young man of Camelot what might have been:

“Don’t let it be forgot.

That once there was a spot

For one brief shining moment that was known as Camelot.”

Comments

Paul Decelles 6 years ago

A Cal Thomas article with which I agree? Saints be praised!

meggers 6 years ago

BuenaVista says :if any one is going to hell it is this man".

Oh? What about those so-called Christians (Catholics included) that take bread from the mouths of the poor and give it to the rich? What about those 'free marketers' that believe it is necessary evil to sacrifice some in our society, so that others can gain more power and success? What about those who rail against abortion, and then cut funds to foster care and people with disabilities? What about the leaders that instigate an elective war, resulting in the deaths of tens of thousands of innocents?

If you're going to pass judgment based on catholic philosophy, perhaps you should look at the whole picture, not just what your political ideology outlines for you. And I suggest you pay special attention to the concepts of repentance, forgiveness, and redemption.

jonas_opines 6 years ago

pdecell (Paul Decelles) says…

"A Cal Thomas article with which I agree? Saints be praised!"

It happens every once in a while. Though, admittedly, this is the first one I can remember that didn't come after a thorough defeat of Republicans in the electorate.

Flap Doodle 6 years ago

"Oh? What about those so-called Christians (Catholics included) that take bread from the mouths of the poor and give it to the rich?" Second-hand bread? Ewwwww!

Leslie Swearingen 6 years ago

No one knows where anyone else is on their faith journey. No one knows who is going to be in either heaven or hell. Ted Kennedy certainly had a right to a funeral mass. It sounds like someone is an ex-Catholic because the church is not being run the way they think it should be.

Kirk Larson 6 years ago

BV Actually no, they no longer have Gov't cheese. That program was cut.

Kirk Larson 6 years ago

I once had a co-worker who would go on about, "That person deserves to go to Hell, and that guy, and those people" until I said, "I don't know if there is a Hell, but I'm sure sanctimony and self-righteousness will get you in".

Commenting has been disabled for this item.