Archive for Thursday, August 20, 2009

State government officials looking for another $250 million in savings

August 20, 2009, 10:11 a.m. Updated August 20, 2009, 5:21 p.m.


— Kansas’ budget director is asking agencies to look for an additional $250 million in future spending cuts, but also suggested Thursday that some legislators are too pessimistic about the state’s finances.

Budget Director Duane Goossen said he’s asked officials for proposals to deal with a 5 percent drop in available tax revenues during the state’s 2011 fiscal year, which begins July 1, 2010. But he said Democratic Gov. Mark Parkinson’s administration hopes to avoid such cuts.

Some Republicans in the GOP-controlled Legislature expect to make deeper cuts for fiscal 2011. They’re relying on projections from legislative staff showing the state facing a budget shortfall of $530 million for fiscal 2011.

But Goossen said those projections assume tax revenues fail to meet expectations for fiscal 2010 and grow by only 1 percent in fiscal 2011.

“I would say they’re being pessimistic,” he said during an interview. “There are a range of assumptions that you could plug in here, and we shouldn’t really be using a number like $500 million.”

State officials and university economists won’t issue an official forecast for 2011 — and the revenue predictions used in budgeting — until November.

But Senate Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jay Emler said he believes the legislative staff’s projections are realistic because of the economy and because Kansas typically lags behind other states in coming out of recessions.

Emler, a Lindsborg Republican, said of Goossen: “I hope he’s right, but I think he may be a little too optimistic.”

House Republican leaders are worried enough about fiscal 2011 to schedule Appropriations Committee meetings this summer and fall, with legislators out of session. Its first special meetings are Monday and Tuesday.

The state has seen four rounds of spending cuts in eight months to prevent a budget deficit from developing. In July, Parkinson made $160 million in adjustments under a law that allows the governor to take such action after legislators have adjourned for the year.

Parkinson acted after the state ended its 2009 fiscal year on June 30 with tax collections $124 million, or about 2.2 percent, less than anticipated and was forced to delay tax refunds and aid payments to schools by a month.

With the last adjustments, the fiscal 2010 budget has about $5.5 billion in spending financed with general tax revenues. That’s $639 million, or 10.4 percent less than in fiscal 2009, but Kansas used federal stimulus funds to backfill, holding the decline in funding to 4.6 percent.

Still, some agencies saw double-digit spending cuts and public schools lost $163 million, with their base state aid declining 4.8 percent.

House Speaker Mike O’Neal, a Hutchinson Republican, noted legislators have been too optimistic before and, “We’re trying to learn from that.”

But Goossen said the state has seen revenue growth coming out of past recessions. For example, in fiscal 2002 — following the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks — general revenues dropped nearly 7 percent but grew in fiscal 2003 by 3.3 percent.

“You can make that number out there in 2011 look however you want it to look by plugging in different assumptions,” Goossen said. “There is not a high degree of certainty yet about the timing of when we’re going to come out of recession.”


LogicMan 5 years, 5 months ago

Hiring freeze. No new construction, only necessary repairs. And no capital expenditures that aren't fed or otherwise funded. K-12 will likely have a further reduction since all other agencies were cut much more deeply.

Bob_Keeshan 5 years, 5 months ago

LogicMan (Anonymous) says…

Hiring freeze. No new construction, only necessary repairs. And no capital expenditures that aren't fed or otherwise funded.

Um, those both happened 15 months ago. What else you got?

Shane Garrett 5 years, 5 months ago

Correct me if I am wrong. But, did I not read a headline which touted an independent auditing agency finding about 2 billion unspent dollars on the books of differing state agencies?

BigDog 5 years, 5 months ago

Made_in_China (Paul R. Getto) says…

Revisit the fact that 90% of the property and 75% of the sales are exempt from taxation. We probably don't need to raise tax rates, but it would be nice if everyone chipped in a little bit. Any more deep cuts and the social services will be severely hurt, not to mention the schools.

I would like to know where you came up with these figures?

somebodynew 5 years, 5 months ago

20 August 2009 at 12:21 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink Bob_Keeshan (Anonymous) says…

LogicMan (Anonymous) says…

Hiring freeze. No new construction, only necessary repairs. And no capital expenditures that aren't fed or otherwise funded. ––––––––––— Um, those both happened 15 months ago. What else you got?

Bob - I don't know where you get you information from, but I havn't seen either of these. Unless you don't count the continuing remodel of the Capitol Building (at millions of dollars) a capital expense. And the State agency I work for has managed to replace workers who left during the last 15 months.

But hey, what do I know ??? I am only there every day.

KS 5 years, 5 months ago

Get rid of about half of the state employees. We can do without.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.