Archive for Saturday, April 18, 2009
City gets $500K to build rentals
Project to offer low-income alternatives
A big grant could help remake a vacant lot in east Lawrence.
April 18, 2009
Advertisement
More than $500,000 in federal grant money is coming to the city and Tenants to Homeowners to build low-income rental units in east Lawrence.
A project to build five low-income rental units on vacant lots in the 1100 block of Rhode Island Street has been awarded $555,000 in Neighborhood Stabilization Program funding, Rebecca Buford, executive director of Lawrence-based Tenants to Homeowners, said Friday.
“With the economy the way it is right now, the need for affordable rental units is probably as big as the need for home ownership opportunities,” Buford said. “I know there are vacancies in the community, but the key is there has to be affordable units.”
Buford said construction work should begin in October on four two- or three-bedroom duplexes and one three-bedroom single-family home. The project will be on three vacant lots just south of an existing home at the southeast corner of 11th and Rhode Island streets.
The project is a partnership of the city, Douglas County and Tenants to Homeowners, which is a city-supported nonprofit group that builds affordable housing. Douglas County owns the three lots, just east of the Judicial and Law Enforcement Center.
Only families that are at least 50 percent below the federal median family income will be allowed to rent the units.
Buford said finding affordable housing for that income group has been particularly challenging in Lawrence.
“It is still around $500 to $600 for a lot of studio apartments in Lawrence,” Buford said. “If your income is $1,000 a month, how are you supposed to make that work?”
Scott McCullough, director of planning and development services for the city, said the lots already are zoned properly for the duplexes. He said the city is excited about moving ahead with the projects.
“This $500,000 of NSP funding helps the community address a recognized need for affordable housing, and we are anxious to put it to work,” McCullough said.
The need for the city to provide local matching funds for the grant is not expected, Buford said. Tenants to Homeowners has obtained a $50,000 grant from Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka to take care of those costs.
The grants also will allow the city and Tenants to Homeowners to purchase and rehabilitate one or two homes that are in the foreclosure process. The homes then would be sold to low-to-moderate income families.
The city and Tenants to homeowners hope to have about $150,000 of grant money left over after building the rental units to devote to the foreclosure purchase program.
More like this
- Nonprofit group to build more affordable homes 126 comments / August 7, 2006
- Affordability of housing in Lawrence debated 92 comments / July 9, 2007
- Building on the possibilities 8 comments / October 9, 2006
- Tenants to Homeowners director leaving position April 1, 2005
- Affordable housing program limits resale profits May 24, 2004
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 53 comments
- At Fambrough’s urging, fans show support for KU football November 26, 2009 · 1 comment
- Quiet revolution taking place in America November 25, 2009 · 117 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 75 comments
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009 · 39 comments
- Lambert performance causes stir November 25, 2009 · 41 comments
- Dropping home values may not accurately reflect market November 25, 2009 · 37 comments
- On the street: Is Thanksgiving your favorite holiday? November 25, 2009 · 44 comments
- Blog: Tasering Your Preteen: Can You Imagine? November 24, 2009 · 68 comments
- Blog: No Worries, Apparently A Lot Of Kids Are That Way. November 25, 2009 · 3 comments
- Former KU Chancellor Laurence Chalmers dies November 25, 2009
- KU says student didn't follow proper lab procedures before exposure to toxic chemical November 25, 2009
- Message warns students at Perry-Lecompton not to attend class today April 20, 2007
- City gives signal for traffic lights November 25, 2009
- Research: Giving thanks brings health, happiness November 25, 2009
- Warm up for holiday cheer with screening of 'Thankskilling' November 24, 2009
- Kansas ranks 24th in nation when it comes to health November 24, 2009
- Former OU basketball coach Billy Tubbs to speak at Lawrence Chamber of Commerce meeting November 24, 2009
- Haskell freshman dies in Montana jail November 24, 2009
- Lawrence leaders offer thoughts on what makes a good board of directors November 25, 2009
18 April 2009
at 7:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
wysiwyg69 (Anonymous) says…
If your income is only 1000.00 a month you ad better get a second, or a different job if you want a life.
18 April 2009
at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
eotw33 (Anonymous) says…
Just do what myself and everyone else is doing…move out of town!
18 April 2009
at 10:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Practicality (Anonymous) says…
If the city wants to increase the revenue that downtown generates, surrounding it with low-income housing doesn't appear to be the best way to do that.
Just my two cents.
18 April 2009
at 1:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Why is the City of Lawrence in the development business when it can't even fix the streets?
18 April 2009
at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
was_freashpowder2 (Alexander Neighbors) says…
Marion, hell the city cant even fix the problem with the police department. They must be Running out of people to target in East lawrence so this might be a way to get the targeted population back up ……
18 April 2009
at 4:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Danimal (Anonymous) says…
So we're turning Lawrence into a Hooverville? Great idea, another winner from the city.
18 April 2009
at 4:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
edjayhawk (Anonymous) says…
Do you qualify if you are terminally unemployed?
18 April 2009
at 7:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
compmd (Anonymous) says…
So let's get this straight. They want to put up a whopping *five* houses for low income families on Rhode Island. How about regulating the ridiculous rental rates of the eleventy billion other rental units in this city?
18 April 2009
at 8:36 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
none2 (Anonymous) says…
What else is the city going to get involved with? Why stop with building rental housing? I think the city needs to get in lots of other professions. We need them to get in the grocery & restaurant business to provide subsidized food. We need them to get in the mortuary business to provide cheap funeral functions. They should also get into the weding business to provide affordable wedings. They should also get into the automobile business so that we can have cheaper cars. They should be in the oil business.
Basically, the government should do everything for us from cradel to grave. Basically, we cannot do anything for ourselves, the government must do it for us.
18 April 2009
at 8:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Apparently no one has noticed that East Lawrence is being “red-lined” by the City with low-income housing.
18 April 2009
at 8:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
biggunz (Anonymous) says…
sky high rent.
18 April 2009
at 9:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
none2 wrote, “…..They should also get into the automobile business so that we can have cheaper cars.”
The Democrats in Congress have this on the agenda. They are talking about a voucher issued to citizens who have a clunker car of 2001 or earlier vintage they can trade in on a new vehicle. Bring the clunker to a dealer and get up to $5,000 credit. This might happen, as Pelosi is said to like the idea.
If you are even thinking about buying a new car and have the luxury of waiting, best wait. Obama might give you a $5,000 check if you buy from the “right” car maker. “Right” is to be determined by Obama. It is not likely to be a Ford, as Ford has not bowed down to the King and has not become indebted to him.
Thus is the beauty of a centrally planned economy.
18 April 2009
at 9:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
Sorry, I had too many windows open. Please bilge this comment, it belongs on the Lippencott blog thread. My apologies.
18 April 2009
at 9:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
My stock tips of the day:
(1) Buy Ford.
(2) Buy GM.
Do not buy new cars because you think you need to in order to get “good gas mileage”.
Find a cruiser, maintain it and don't get too excited about the fuel economy.
You won't have a car payment and that money will go a long way towards buying fuel.
18 April 2009
at 10:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
I see a centrally planned economy as one where the governing elite pick and choose the winners and the losers in the economy.
That is precisely what Obama, Giethner, Bernanke, Pelosi, et al are doing.
18 April 2009
at 10:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
swan_diver (Anonymous) says…
Still seems that the usual pack of right-wingnuts on this thread didn't catch the fact that the capitalist scum who own the national business, banking and real estate industries have intentionally gutted the economic heart of the nation, with the objective of creating a permanent under-class out of 70% of our population. They managed to accomplish this task only with the support of these same shameless traitors, who continue to use these phosphors for their own self-aggrandising lies and opinions.
18 April 2009
at 11:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
What would happen if the $500,000 had been used to seed local businesses, rather than to buy land and pay, one time, for services to build houses that will be rented for far less than market rate of comparable rental properties?
18 April 2009
at 11:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
swan_diver (Anonymous) says…
Still seems that the usual pack of right-wingnuts on this thread didn't catch the fact that the capitalist scum who own the national business, banking and real estate industries have intentionally gutted the economic heart of the nation, with the objective of creating a permanent under-class out of 70% of our population. They managed to accomplish this task only with the support of these same shameless traitors, who continue to use these phosphors for their own self-aggrandising lies and opinions.”
Marion writes:
Huh?
In any case, I am not participating in the so-called “recession”.
19 April 2009
at 12:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
lawthing (Anonymous) says…
Lawrence is already overbuilt. With a lot of empty rentals,
I bet the under belly of this plan is for the City to provide City owned rentals to the homeless population.
19 April 2009
at 1:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Newell_Post (Anonymous) says…
This is not a legitimate function of government. There is not one word in the constitution about the federal government taxing individuals, to give the money to local governments, to build houses, to rent to other individuals.
19 April 2009
at 2:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Starness34 (Anonymous) says…
No more rentals!!
19 April 2009
at 5:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OldEnuf2BYurDad (Anonymous) says…
Swan… was that a joke? If you are striving to *appear* intellectual, informed and politically correct, you accomplished your goal. We all get that you *appear* to be all that.
“the objective of creating a permanent under-class out of 70% of our population”
Wow, what sort of objective is that?
19 April 2009
at 6:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mae (Anonymous) says…
$500 for a studio is ridiculous when $750 should get you a mortgage on an entry home with good credit. This stimulus seems to be exploited by the very people who hate obama. It almost seems he's exploiting the ones who had hope when voting. I don't see where it's being regulated to help low income people. Having rent doesn't help anyone. Giving responsible low income people low payment crappy housing that they can afford to own and possibly fix up does. There's so many houses going to waste with busted pipes and ruined roofs/exteriors that could easily be reduced to 50% price to approved buyers. I've been tracking about 5 houses that have been pretty much abandoned aside from lawnmowing from one realtor for 2yrs. It's a lynch mob! The price has gone from $75 to low $30's, you can't tell me the government that now controls big bank won't give out subsidies to get these occuppied. Maybe not homeless & jobless, but at least the 20-30 age living with others could invest in something worthwhile and pay taxes.
19 April 2009
at 6:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mae (Anonymous) says…
:) who do you hire to fix your house? low income people that can fix the dilapidated houses in your area or master's student's that don't know a thing about their own house?
we can fix this problem easily by financing low income good credit people on cheaper old housing rather than razing and rebuilding. most people that are eligible would laugh that off as plastic homes and opt for older homes anyways.
/after they put them up for you just to get some work