Archive for Monday, September 8, 2008
City Commissioners to consider plan for future industrial parks
City commissioners struggle with how important prime pieces of farmland should be to Douglas County's future.
September 8, 2008
Advertisement
City Commissioners to consider plan for industrial park in SE Douglas County
City commissioners are set to debate where the businesses of the future should locate in Lawrence. Enlarge video
Right now the intersection of Kansas Highway 33 and U.S. Highway 56 in southeast Douglas County looks like many other rural corners - a couple of houses and a couple of pastures.
But in the future it could be the home to a new industrial park designed to take advantage of the planned transportation hub being built by the Burlington Northern Santa Fe railroad in nearby Gardner.
At least that's what a new plan that city and county leaders will soon debate says.
Lawrence city commissioners at their meeting Tuesday night will consider adopting a new industrial chapter of Horizon 2020, the long-range comprehensive plan of the city and county.
The new chapter lists 11 general areas of the county that seem suited for future industrial or business park development. Economic development leaders are urging approval of the plan.
"We don't have a lot of land in our inventory right now," said Beth Johnson, vice president of economic development with the Lawrence Chamber of Commerce. "We really need to increase that inventory in order for businesses to even look at us."
The list of possible locations include several that have been talked about for years. Property near the Lawrence Municipal Airport continues to be listed as a possible site, despite commissioners being lukewarm to a recent proposal to rezone approximately 145 acres in the area to allow for industrial development.
Both commissioners Rob Chestnut and Boog Highberger said Monday they were open to leaving the airport location in the plan, but said that doesn't mean they are ready to support the current proposal for development in the area.
"There is probably some room for industrial development in North Lawrence in the future, but you still have to take into account the specific drainage issues and the impact it would have on prime agricultural soils," Highberger said. "I don't think this plan commits us to any specific sites."
Other sites listed in the plan include: the former Farmland Industries property east of Lawrence; the area south and east of O'Connell Road and Kansas Highway 10 near the Douglas County Jail; the area near the Farmers Turnpike and Interstate 70; the area near the South Lawrence Trafficway and U.S. Highway 40 west of Lawrence; an area near the Midland Junction north of North Lawrence; two areas along K-10 highway near Eudora; an area near Baldwin City; and an area near the intersection of U.S. Highway 59 and U.S. Highway 56.
But several commissioners and economic development leaders have said they want to make sure that other sites not included in the list of 11 can be considered in the future too.
"I don't want this to be an exclusive list," Chestnut said. "I don't think there is anyway for us to anticipate what all the relevant sites may be 10 years from now."
City commissioners meet at 6:35 p.m. Tuesday at City Hall, Sixth and Massachusetts streets. If city commissioners approve the plan, it still must be approved by Douglas County commissioners before it becomes final.
More like this
- City approves industrial plan 1 comment / December 7, 2005
- TRAFFICWAY PROPOSAL ADOPTED BY COUNTY October 12, 1989
- City Commissioners approve plan for county's future industrial development 5 comments / September 10, 2008
- Economic map to include potential industrial parks 1 comment / September 26, 2007
- Discussion of Lawrence airport industrial park delayed; issue was set for Tuesday city meeting May 23, 2008
Top ads RSS
- House health care bill is likely to stall in Senate November 9, 2009 · 48 comments
- City hopes to get grant money to make safer path between KU campus and downtown November 9, 2009 · 17 comments
- Blog: Being A Stripper: 10 Things I'Ve Learned So Far November 10, 2009 · 6 comments
- Blog: Dillons, Hyvee, And Checkers — I'Ve Shopped And Compared. See The Results. November 8, 2009 · 191 comments
- Killing daughter can’t be matter of honor November 8, 2009 · 61 comments
- On the street: How do you like your peanut butter sandwiches? November 9, 2009 · 65 comments
- 'White Owl' held in jail in connection with protective order case November 9, 2009 · 57 comments
- Poll: Have you read Truman Capote’s book, “In Cold Blood”? November 9, 2009 · 2 comments
- Blog: Song Titles And Lyrics: Nonsensical Non Word Songs! November 9, 2009 · 97 comments
- Thanks to Moore November 10, 2009 · 8 comments
- 'White Owl' held in jail in connection with protective order case November 9, 2009
- Five downtown Lawrence businesses report burglaries over the weekend November 9, 2009
- KU grad student who accidentally ingested chemical is released from LMH November 9, 2009
- 50th anniversary of slayings memorialized by 'In Cold Blood' approaches November 9, 2009
- 'In Cold Blood' tombstones on display after long ordeal November 4, 2001
- Season's greetings: Photographer’s book explores Kansas nature November 10, 2009
- Topeka man in serious condition after accident west of Baldwin City November 9, 2009
- American heritage: KU contributes to new Native galleries at Nelson-Atkins November 8, 2009
- Algae’s energy potential blooms November 9, 2009
- Brain scans may help diagnosis of PTSD November 10, 2009
8 September 2008
at 9:28 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
repaste (Anonymous) says…
Hey Lawrence, just wanted to say thanks for new water tower, new sewers pumpstation and other improvements you have made in west lawrence this past year. I know they were very expensive and you could have spent the money on other things, the T, sidewalks, bike paths, street repairs, libraries, etc. I know growth in Lawrence has been very low, if any, some residential and commercial areas in east lawrence may decay more now due to overbuilding, but we will able to make an awful lot of money on this land now and, well, money means a lot to us even though we already have a lot! Your tax dollars are a important, as long as we don't have to pay our share! Thanks again suckers, Doug, Duane, and other friendly developers
9 September 2008
at 6:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jayhawklawrence (Anonymous) says…
It is good to see that this critical need is being addressed so that we can have hope for a future that doesn't rely on bars and fast food restaurants.
9 September 2008
at 7:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigPrune (Anonymous) says…
repaste,The “new sewers pumpstation and other improvements” are typically paid for by the developers (including new streets). So, before you give the City credit, perhaps your post should be thanking the developers instead.
9 September 2008
at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cheeseburger (Anonymous) says…
I was never in favor of the city and county planning departments merging, and this is precisely why - the Lawrence city commission is planning what is to happen to a tract of land that is not only not within the city limits, but about 20 miles away from Lawrence! The commissioners cannot appropriately and adequately handle what they should be dealing with in the city - why would anyone think they should be expending effort and money on something 20 miles away? Get your own house in order first before trying to control the entire county!
9 September 2008
at 3:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
EarthaKitt (Anonymous) says…
Copy editor cop says:”I don't want this to be an exclusive list,” Chestnut said. “I don't think there is anyway for us to anticipate what all the relevant sites may be 10 years from now.”ANY WAY
10 September 2008
at 12:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
LogicMan (Anonymous) says…
The County is a higher sovereign than the City; the County, unless it chooses otherwise, is not bound by decisions or ordinances of lower sovereigns. I hope that the County Commissioners realize these things, and make their plans and decisions with the best interests of the whole county in mind.
10 September 2008
at 12:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hipper_than_hip (Anonymous) says…
The commissioners are in bed with the developers and do whatever the developers want them to do. The same goes for the planning commissioners and the city commissioners.