Archive for Tuesday, October 7, 2008
Group floats riverside development idea in North Lawrence
Riverside redevelopment: Group hopes to highlight city’s waterfront
A group of local developers wants to give people in Lawrence a new reason to visit the banks of the Kansas River.
October 7, 2008
Advertisement
A development group is working to create a new riverside district of shops and offices - and perhaps homes or a hotel - on property near Johnny's Tavern in North Lawrence.
Developers don't have specific plans for the nearly 20 acres surrounding the longtime Lawrence tavern, but they envision an area where people could dine, shop and stroll along the Kansas River, said Rick Renfro, owner of Johnny's.
"One of the things I really like about the idea is that the river is a resource that not enough people get to take advantage of in Lawrence," Renfro said.
The project, though, is far from a done deal. The development first needs to acquire property from the city and from the Kaw River Drainage District. The two entities own a combined 4 acres of property near the Kansas River levee that the development group wants to add to the approximately 16 acres the group already owns.
Commissioners will discuss the request at their 5:30 p.m. meeting tonight, but will not take any action to formally sell the property to the group. The developers have proposed paying about $330,000 for the property.
The idea has caught the interest of city staff members.
"I think the opportunity to do a major redevelopment adjacent to the river is very exciting," said City Manager David Corliss. "I think it could be an extension of downtown. I think it could be complementary to downtown."
The development group clearly wants the project to tie into the success of downtown. The group is named North Mass Development Group LLC. In addition to Renfro, it includes Wichita developer Christian Ablah - who led efforts to develop a Home Depot and Best Buy at 31st and Iowa - and Lawrence businessman Jon Davis.
Lawrence attorney Dan Watkins, who is representing the group, said the project would be a true mixed-use development - meaning that shops, restaurants and offices may be located on the ground floors of buildings while apartments or condos could be located on upper floors.
The project potentially could dislocate some existing residences. The proposed redevelopment area includes an aged trailer court of about 25 units north of the Johnny's location. Watkins, though, said there would be plenty of time to develop a plan to help any residents relocate, if it comes to that. Watkins said he thought it would be about two years before the project got close to a construction stage.
That's in part because the developers will have to receive a host of approvals from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to ensure that any development doesn't damage the Kansas River levee system.
The project also will have to receive City Commission approval, starting with the agreement to sell property to the developers. Corliss said the property the developers would like to purchase from the city contains no public amenities such as trails or recreation areas. He said the property essentially is vacant ground near the base of the Kansas River levee.
The project also would not make any changes to the Kansas River levee itself or to the popular hike and bike trail on top of the levee.
"We actually think the project would enhance the use of that trail," Corliss said.
More like this
- City agrees to contract to sell riverfront land 2 comments / October 29, 2008
- Creative concept 11 comments / October 9, 2008
- City may sell land for riverfront project 25 comments / October 28, 2008
- City loosens restrictions on water in county 14 comments / October 8, 2008
- Missouri Levee project touted May 21, 2005
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Nation has right to ask ‘why?’ November 21, 2009 · 19 comments
- On the street: Will you miss ‘The Oprah Winfrey’ show? November 21, 2009 · 10 comments
- Mangino's contract outlines probe November 21, 2009 · 23 comments
- Four decades in crisis mode November 21, 2009 · 8 comments
- Researcher: Writing proves Shroud of Turin is real November 21, 2009 · 9 comments
- Nothing to lose: Reeling KU huge underdog for a change November 21, 2009 · 12 comments
- Blog: Palin Book Could Be Your Cheapest Source For Winter Fuel November 20, 2009 · 64 comments
- Muslim countries seek blasphemy ban November 20, 2009 · 28 comments
- Mangino denies validity of former player allegations November 19, 2009 · 158 comments
- Blog: We Noticed November 19, 2009 · 118 comments
- Mangino's contract outlines probe November 21, 2009
- Four decades in crisis mode November 21, 2009
- On target November 21, 2009
- CLARENCE E. RINKE OBITUARY October 19, 1999
- Farmers' Turnpike reopens after four months of construction November 20, 2009
- Chiefs honor ex-left offensive tackle Roaf December 15, 2008
- Researcher: Writing proves Shroud of Turin is real November 21, 2009
- Not-so-gentle reign November 19, 2009
- 40 years ago: Construction begins on Meadowlark addition November 21, 2009
- Sexual healing: Dennis Dailey coaches couples with tough love at his intimacy workshop November 20, 2009


7 October 2008
at 5:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
458casul (Anonymous) says…
perfect
7 October 2008
at 6:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Made_in_China (Paul R. Getto) says…
Good idea.
7 October 2008
at 6:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
nwkshawk (Anonymous) says…
Sounds good. But then again, anything that gets rid of trailer parks sounds good to me.
7 October 2008
at 6:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Donnuts (Anonymous) says…
Lots of people run by there. We could even put a Ferry boat there in the future with a casino in it. We could make more carriage rides downtown as well. We could make Lawrence a real festive place. Instead of letting it go to the dogs.
7 October 2008
at 6:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
grimpeur (Anonymous) says…
Will the project include a grocery store?
7 October 2008
at 6:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
nobody1793 (Anonymous) says…
Someone needs to build an outlet mall there.
7 October 2008
at 7:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
I guess we finally know why the Gaslight is closing.
7 October 2008
at 7:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
readit (Anonymous) says…
Yes! It's such a shame that the river isn't showcased more in Lawrence. And clean up Burcham Park while you're at it. Worst park in the city.
7 October 2008
at 7:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cait48 (Anonymous) says…
This project is going to go down like the Titanic. Not because it's not a good idea. It's a great idea. But historically this city hates North Lawrence and will do nothing to assist and develop it, unlike the Oread neighborhood. North Lawrence has always been “the wrong side of the tracks”, even moreso than East Lawrence. Proximity to the train tracks has always been a sticking point. Who wants to live/work/shop next to an area where trains go by at all hours of the day and night? This is sad because there are homes in North Lawrence with just as much historical value as those in Old West Lawrence. But those homes were working class homes when they were built and remain working class homes now. Poor North Lawrence. It will always be the red headed step child.
7 October 2008
at 7:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
alm77 (Anonymous) says…
Sounds awesome. Do it! I just hope it's a success.
7 October 2008
at 7:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BuffyloGal (Anonymous) says…
When they start talking about an aquarium to vitalize the downtown area further, you know you are now in every other major city in America. Expensive condos close to a downtown area is never the answer.
7 October 2008
at 7:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mommaeffortx2 (Anonymous) says…
bozo gaslight is not in north lawrence.
7 October 2008
at 7:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
justaverage (Anonymous) says…
Hope they buy flood insurance!
7 October 2008
at 8:04 a.m.
Permalink
consumer1 (Anonymous) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
7 October 2008
at 8:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunflour (Anonymous) says…
mommaeffortx2, the Gaslight has been across from Johnny's at 2nd & Locust for at least 4 years now. This is an interesting idea, but what makes them think this is a better idea than the failed outlet mall along the river that is now a hotel, or the development along N 2nd Street that now stands empty — the mall near the turnpike entrance, and also the new buildings along the street… People have built up new stuff at least 3 times and had it fail miserably.
7 October 2008
at 8:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Pywacket (Anonymous) says…
I hope they look at Omaha as a source of viable ideas & plans. Different scale, of course, but they have done beautiful things along their river and it is anything but an unsightly haven for scruffians.It's encouraging that they're looking to develop this area, at any rate, and that Rick is on board.
7 October 2008
at 8:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rtwngr (Anonymous) says…
Let's see, the river smells bad. The traffic through that stretch of N. Lawrence bottlenecks about there. The infrastructure of N. Lawrence can barely handle the population that currently resides there. Great idea.
7 October 2008
at 8:19 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
toe (Anonymous) says…
Look out taxpayers. I see another mouth to feed.
7 October 2008
at 8:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
texburgh (Anonymous) says…
If done well, these kinds of developments do work. Look at Omaha (thanks Pywacket) but also look at the River Market in Little Rock or the tobacco warehouse district in Richmond, Virginia. Restaurants, shops, museums, theater, and residences all must be part of the mix.
7 October 2008
at 8:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Mass St. is going to fight this all the way. Interesting idea, doubt it will happen on the scale described in the article.
7 October 2008
at 8:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cowboy (Anonymous) says…
great idea , most of the ground is bought already , get it done , use the obsolete T buses to have shuttles between downtown and “Uptown”.
7 October 2008
at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
LMH (Anonymous) says…
If Lawrence can mimic what Wichita did to its riverfront, that would be awesome - but I still remember the fights and discussion that went on when the Riverfront outlet mall building was erected. The venue ultimately got rave reviews and high traffic, until the “new” wore off and either people quit coming to Lawrence for that shopping adventure, or Downtown Lawrence quit promoting it (and the one in N. Lawrence, too…) “Build it and they will come”. Fine. Only don't let yet another expensive venture fall into ruin……
7 October 2008
at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
flyin_squirrel (Anonymous) says…
Bob,Why would mass street fight this? Mass St. should fight developments on the other side of town, but this will compliment them. More residents and customers closer to downtown will only help the downtown businesses. One thing any downtown needs is residents living in or nearby. This sounds like it will increase the population base near downtown.
7 October 2008
at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mommaeffortx2 (Anonymous) says…
sunflour does that mean two gaslights in lawrence? I thought the trailer court in north lawrence had a diffrent name oh well live and learn.
7 October 2008
at 8:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cowboy (Anonymous) says…
gaslight is a bar across from Johnny's , both the malls were poorly implemented with third tier tenants and high prices. A lot of the business owners in Lawrence , IMHO , think if you open a door your should have all the business , they forget quality , service , and value is what creates long term success.we ate a one of the BBQ joints downtown on Sunday , the service was pathetic and the food not much better, someone ought to start a waitperson school n lawrence !
7 October 2008
at 8:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OzChicklet (Anonymous) says…
Sunflour hit the nail on the head:This is an interesting idea, but what makes them think this is a better idea than the failed outlet mall along the river that is now a hotel, or the development along N 2nd Street that now stands empty - the mall near the turnpike entrance, and also the new buildings along the street: People have built up new stuff at least 3 times and had it fail miserably.___________________________________________History will repeat itself once again. They better have good flood insurance. I remember when the outlet mall on the river had flood water halfway up the windows on the lower floor. Very scary. However, if this project does fly, it might be rather cool if they included an area for an everyday farmers market.
7 October 2008
at 8:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
verity (Anonymous) says…
Somebody fill me in–I thought the Riverfront Mall had not failed, but was bought out by someone who wanted to change it. What was the story there?This sounds like a great idea–San Antonio also has a great riverwalk. I also like the idea of closing part of Mass Street to vehicle traffic so there can be more outdoor dining and less crowded sidewalks.
7 October 2008
at 9:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cowboy (Anonymous) says…
Riverfront failed , went mostly vacant for awhile , then had temp tenants , then the Marriot , Sunflower and city offices
7 October 2008
at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
SMe (Anonymous) says…
First thought was “It's about (&%% time.”Second thought was “Oh, yea. Riverfront Mall.”Third thought “Another way to get into the tax basket.”Last thought “Citizens are screwed again.”
7 October 2008
at 9:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigAl (Anonymous) says…
I think this is a great idea. The upside to this is endless. I totally agree with Rick Renfro that the river is almost a totally untapped resource in Lawrence. This sounds like a win-win situation all around.
7 October 2008
at 9:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
badger (Anonymous) says…
This again?
7 October 2008
at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
alm77 (Anonymous) says…
SMe, that's what I'm afraid of, but on the other hand, I agree with BigAl, the river could be a great resource. I can't believe we live in a town with a river running through it and it's as though it doesn't even exist. I am concerned about the smell though, that river isn't the cleanest.
7 October 2008
at 9:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
8muddyboots (Anonymous) says…
The old train depot is such a showcase for the city right there across from Johnny's. This sounds like things are right on track - investing in the old train depot paid off and now has created enough momentum for adding umph to the business scene there. In case folks haven't been paying attention - north lawrence is looking good and it's high time to move forward. Flooding is ALWAYS an issue next to a river but Johnny's has dealt with that in the past. They know what they're getting into. One more thing - if you think the river stinks stay away from it so that those of us that appreciate it won't have to deal with your bad attitude. Clean up your act - don't let your dog dupey rinse into the storm drain, stop over fertilizing your yard, get your oil leaks taken care of, & honestly, pick up a little trash before it gets into the storm drains - even if it's not your's….live on the wild side. The rest of us & the river would be most appreciative - so would these creative small business owners who are willing to put their necks out for our community.
7 October 2008
at 9:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
50YearResident (Anonymous) says…
Location! Location! Location! Success is determined by location. One way in and one way out of this dead end area. That is the reason the other two malls failed. If you can't get hundreds of cars in and out it is destined to fail. Add to that the river and train problem and this will be an investor's nightmare. You might as well throw the money into the river and watch it float away as that is what is going to happen to it anyway.
7 October 2008
at 9:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
flyin_squirrel (Anonymous) says…
I think it is a great idea. You cannot compare the Riverfront mall since you couldn't even see the river when inside (except on the staircases). And the tenants at the Riverfront mall were terrible.
7 October 2008
at 9:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
packs_of_wild_dogzz (Anonymous) says…
Sounds like a cool idea. Why would Mass St. fight it? It seems like it would basically be an extension of Mass St.
7 October 2008
at 9:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
birdsandflowers (Anonymous) says…
I LOVE the idea. I've been to other cities that have beautiful attractions along riverfronts and always wondered why Lawrence (and Topeka for that matter) didn't tap into the natural resource of the river to enhance their cities.I hope the development includes numerous fine dining establishments that capture the ambiance of the night lights shining off the river.
7 October 2008
at 9:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OldEnuf2BYurDad (Anonymous) says…
Great idea! Only one question: how will they fix the traffic issues? That's already a nasty intersection. They'd have to do some major road surgery first.
7 October 2008
at 10:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
lawrenceks66 (Anonymous) says…
Could we PLEASE have a grocery store too?????
7 October 2008
at 10:02 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jafs (Anonymous) says…
This might be an interesting idea, but only if it can be done without any “tax incentives” for the developers involved, and without huge outlays for infrastructure from the city.But, it very well might not work, for many of the reasons stated above.
7 October 2008
at 10:08 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
bangaranggerg (Anonymous) says…
Best development idea for Lawrence in so many years I can't even recall. I'm wishing I'd have thought of it. If there are condos overlooking the river, I'd move there in a second. This is exciting, I hope the drop some big money developing the area and it doesn't end up like Topeka's riverfront development idea with some crumby ballpark that's never going to happen.
7 October 2008
at 10:17 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
northtown (Anonymous) says…
More really nice looking metal buidings? Could use a grocery store?Created to much run off? Why not use the old mall ? Trailer park does need to go.Who pays for it?Corp will never go for it? Lawrence needs green space in flood plain!! Just a bad idea,bad location.River smells bad,maybe that is the downtown? Topeks is going to try one also. How about those power lines? To mant questions for more empty buidings in North?Why not just Lawrence? Alawys North Lawrence,maybe they don't want to be in your city? Your city has major problems already,fix those first,just more devolpment this city cannot handle.Taxes wil be higher,people are leaving..But your next president is going to save the country???Good Luck Lawrence!!!!!!
7 October 2008
at 10:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Keith (Anonymous) says…
They should be required to build everything on barges so they can float in the next flood.
7 October 2008
at 10:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Flying_Colonel (Anonymous) says…
What a great idea!!! In addition to all the locations mentioned by others, Tulsa's Riverwalk has been extremely successful. Here is a link to it: http://www.tulsa-riverwalk.com/
7 October 2008
at 10:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
gccs14r (Anonymous) says…
OKC's Bricktown is pretty cool, too, all things considered. If this development goes in, they should set up either a trolley or ferry to link it to downtown.
7 October 2008
at 10:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
50YearResident (Anonymous) says…
Keep in mind, the levee is higher than the surrounding land and can not be built on so the only view of the river would be 3rd floor or higher from the lowland. When you get high enough to view the river all you will see is the yellow foamy crud floating on stagnant water, This is not something to draw large crowds with.
7 October 2008
at 11:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cheeseburger (Anonymous) says…
OldEnuf - As long as Chuck Soules is in charge, the answer to your question is 'build a roundabout' !!
7 October 2008
at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cheeseburger (Anonymous) says…
I have not seen the riverwalks in Omaha, Tulsa, or San Antonio, but are any of them along a dirty, filthy, muddy, river? I could see the draw if the river was clean and pleasing to the senses of sight and smell … .
7 October 2008
at 11:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KU_cynic (Anonymous) says…
Perhaps a viable idea.But please let's not hold up the city, county, and school district with crazy tax-subsidized schemes like TIF financing. Let this development rise (or not) based on its own merit, not the ability of politically connected developers to hoodwink our amateurish city politicans and staff into tax subsidies.
7 October 2008
at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
flyin_squirrel (Anonymous) says…
cheeseburger,All those rivers are dirty, filthy, muddy and worse…
7 October 2008
at 12:13 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Confrontation (Anonymous) says…
gccs14r (Anonymous) says: “OKC's Bricktown is pretty cool, too, all things considered. If this development goes in, they should set up either a trolley or ferry to link it to downtown.”I also like Bricktown. Sure, it's a man-made canal, but it draws a ton of tourists. The water taxi can drop you off at any area along the canal. Of course, they do have big attractions in Bricktown, such as the Ballpark, museums, Bass Pro Shop, etc. http://www.bricktownokc.com/
7 October 2008
at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KU_Dude (Anonymous) says…
I wonder if the developers have considered expanding the trailer park? If that was done, I'm sure Wal-Mart would consider putting a super-center next door.
7 October 2008
at 12:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
flyin_squirrel (Anonymous) says…
Ever been to the San Antonio River Walk? It is nothing more than an open storm sewer turned into a major tourist attraction. Why can Lawrence not do the same?
7 October 2008
at 1:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
allateup (Anonymous) says…
Does this mean Johnny's tavern would do something about their bathroom's?
7 October 2008
at 1:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Philboyd_Studge (Anonymous) says…
I understand the skepticism and the comparisons of this possible project to previous failed factory malls, etc. And, of course, no development is a guaranteed winner. But a pedestrian friendly, mixed-use project that puts focus on the river — Lawrence's most important and beautiful natural asset — makes good sense. I've lived in a couple communities out West that invested in similar riverside developments. In both cases (Truckee, CA; and Bend, OR) they really had positive impacts.
7 October 2008
at 1:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
northtown (Anonymous) says…
Will the gaslight and the outdoor music stay? Will Johnny's change thier look on the outside? Will the old feedstore to the north of Johnny's go? If they do this,will they clean up more than just the trailer park? It all needs to go.Buid it bigger,buy up all thr e sites along 3rd St. in that area and use it also..The city does overllok North Lawrence,people with old cars in yards,yards full of weeds and brush,Houses that need painted.All is illegal according to city codes.why do they not enforce them,fines would make them some money..We own rental property in North lawrence and keep those properties up.Why does the city overllok this part of town? Allowing big metal buidings to be buildt along what they call the entrance to the city.What would be done with the intersection in front of Johnny,s,who would pay for that improvement? Taxpayer? City is in a mess,This would be a good thing if done right,and do add a grocery store,with phamacy.A better walkway across river,who would pay for that?Questions,Questions,Questions?To many to ask>What happened to the one along sixth street ,in front of the west side High school?Is it still going to be put there? Finish something,somebody….Devolpment would help Lawrence if done right…..This town needs help!!!!Go for it,pray some dam does not fail out west,How long can you tread water? Lake are getting old and in need of repairs to dams ..Someday it will flood again!!!Old levee system,water will go around or over it someday.But build it ,just more empty space waiting for a renter to come along….Who Knows,i don't,do you?????
7 October 2008
at 2:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
northtown (Anonymous) says…
I meant to say second street ,not third……..Got them screwed up,like the rest of the city,maybe????
7 October 2008
at 2:31 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
d_prowess (Anonymous) says…
The vision in my head of a project like this looks great, but I do wonder what would go in there and would it add to the community or just shift revenue from other businesses. I feel like the last census showed that we were fairly stagnant in population growth. Therefore would new restaurants or stores just eat up the consumer dollars that currently go to other local businesses? I am not saying that is necessarily a bad thing since that is just competition, but I would hate to then see a lot of empty storefronts throughout the rest of town.
7 October 2008
at 3:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OzChicklet (Anonymous) says…
8muddyboots (Anonymous) says: …One more thing - if you think the river stinks stay away from it so that those of us that appreciate it won't have to deal with your bad attitude. Clean up your act - don't let your dog dupey rinse into the storm drain, stop over fertilizing your yard, get your oil leaks taken care of, & honestly, pick up a little trash before it gets into the storm drains - even if it's not your's:.live on the wild side. The rest of us & the river would be most appreciative - so would these creative small business owners who are willing to put their necks out for our community.________________________________The crud in the river is dumped upstream and what we see here is a result of that. I lived here when it was still safe to boat and catch fish from the river.The idea is good, but the location is very poor.
7 October 2008
at 3:49 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mommaeffortx2 (Anonymous) says…
ok people so is the trailer court over there called gaslight or not I seem to have read conflicting data on that one?
7 October 2008
at 4:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rockchalkjayhawk (Anonymous) says…
mom - there is a gaslight trailer park over by home depot and then there is the Gas Light Tavern right next to Johnny's. I have no idea what the name of the trailer park near the river is called.
7 October 2008
at 4:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marty_McFly (Anonymous) says…
Gaslight trailer park = South Lawrence next to home depotGaslight tavern = bar across street south of johnny'scase closed. heavy.
7 October 2008
at 4:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OonlyBonly (Anonymous) says…
Alm77 and all those thinking how great a “resource” the river could be to the town. I suggest you go down there (the river) after some heavy rains out West (past Topeka) or South (wherever) and watch the untreated sewage and foam float past.Fixin' it up could be a good idea. San Antonio, Wichita and others are really nice but there's no way the state is gonna force Kansas municipalities up river to clean up their acts - that'd be too expensive and who needs (wants) clean water anyways?
7 October 2008
at 4:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mommaeffortx2 (Anonymous) says…
Thanks people I thought so but hey you never know.
7 October 2008
at 5:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Donnuts (Anonymous) says…
I think a grocery store would be a great idea for the area.1) most the people are lower income2) ease of transportation to the area of lower income “families”3) the last one there was a long time ago.However…the area is more susceptible to burglaries in the later hours and less able to be protected by law enforcement. This is due to the area of town it is located in and the ease of someone from out of town to access much like some of the previous robberies that have occurred in the past at liquor stores on the edge of town etc.A miniature version of a riverboat casino would be a nice idea however the area is susceptible to flooding occasionally. This is not unlike other areas like along the Mississippi and could be accommodated for structurally. It would be a plausible idea since the trend is to build casinos and the influx of transitive college student population and the money spent on “entertainment” anyway. I am not sure Lawrence needs such to bring revenue into the town but a lot of what the town revolves around for fun is similar. I would just as well wish them all go to Kansas City or Westport for their “fun” anyway.
7 October 2008
at 5:09 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
konzahawk (Anonymous) says…
Sounds great. While they are at it, maybe they can get rid of that god-awful grain elevator. At least, spruce it up. Lawrence is supposed to be the city of arts. That grain elevator is the largest canvas in town. I'm thinking Frank Lloyd Wright-type art and iron work. Turn this eyesore into a tourist attraction or tear it down.
7 October 2008
at 6:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KUweatherman (Curtis Lange) says…
Sounds like a great idea! Only problems I see are noise from the trains keeping come people away and the lack of viable entrances in and out of this area.
7 October 2008
at 6:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
blindrabbit (Anonymous) says…
I can just imagine gondolas on the Kaw to follow! How romantic, a muddy river full of upstream waterwater treatment effluents and pesticides. Just watch out for the dam!Really, the projects sounds like a good idea, based on the minimum of facts we now know.
7 October 2008
at 10:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
packs_of_wild_dogzz (Anonymous) says…
Northtown,What the hell did you say??? Maybe you could try constructing meaningful sentences with proper punctuation. It might make what you have to say easier to understand.
7 October 2008
at 11:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RKLOG (Mark Andrew) says…
No more development. Too much already. Nothing wrong with the way it looks up there. Go somewhere else to make your money.
8 October 2008
at 12:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
People come up with good ideas before knowing if there are enough retail and residential dollars to support such a project. There are only so many retail and residential dollars in any community. If neither produces the desired results, tax and user fees go up as has happened the last 20 years and locals pick up the tab.Residential including rental and retail are flooded. This is a known factor although ignored. Some like to pretend Lawrence is more than it is. Some do not want to believe in Economic Displacement, Economic Pollution or flooded markets. The sub prime fiasco is far from over maybe a few years. The Antique Mall building downtown is for sale why not invest in that and bring Lands End to town. This would increase walk-by traffic for all merchants and pay back the community. Or invest in Tanger Mall and make it work… laundromat,grocery and a hardware store is all that North Lawrence has been asking.The bottom line is people come to Lawrence for football,basketball and downtown. Too much more traffic at that intersection would spell economic disaster for any retail development. Access would be difficult no matter what. Shoppers are not going drive from anywhere to shop there as a destination point.
8 October 2008
at 12:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
One thing that would work and is a proven theory. Johnny's.Set a rustic looking new Johnny's back where the mobile homes are, complete with inside/ outside bar and dining,blues and bluegrass music indoor stage and a pinball room. Remove the old wood structures and replace with landscaping. Try a florist shop in the stone buildings.Good Luck
8 October 2008
at 9:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
easmith14 (Anonymous) says…
Floating a new development idea? Lawhorn, that idea doesn't hold water.