Archive for Thursday, May 29, 2008

Import inquiry

A current congressional investigation raises some serious doubts about the safety of imported food.

May 29, 2008


An allegation that private U.S. laboratories have selectively withheld test results on imported food from the federal Food and Drug Administration reveals what seems like a serious flaw in the nation's food safety network.

The U.S. House Committee on Energy and Commerce has sent letters to 10 testing labs suggesting that the labs have been complicit in efforts by food importers to sidestep FDA requirements. And why not? The labs are hired and paid by the importers. Why wouldn't they choose to keep their paying customers happy?

The labs are suspected of using a number of tactics to help their customers avoid proper FDA oversight. One is to simply keep testing samples until a satisfactory result is achieved. That result is then forwarded to the FDA, and the others are discarded. It also is alleged that importers that receive a failed result from one lab would simply hire another lab to continue testing until a positive result was achieved.

These practices came to the attention of Congress earlier this year when the CEO of one private lab testified that the labs don't always tell the FDA about tests that indicate imported food is contaminated. Although labs are required to sign a statement that they are submitting all the work that was done on a sample, the CEO said, the importers that hire the labs actually control who gets the test results.

This apparent case of the fox guarding the hen house could have serious consequences for American consumers. The congressional committee has specifically asked for information about food that was found to be contaminated with chemicals or bacteria such as E.coli, salmonella or listeria. If four samples of a food import are found to be contaminated with salmonella, but only the fifth positive sample is ever forwarded to the FDA, what happens to the source of the other four? That's a riddle that American consumers shouldn't have to ask themselves.

If food importers have such tight control over the testing system that the FDA and the American public can no longer trust test results - or the safety of imported food - the agency has failed in one of its most basic and essential duties. If such "mistakes" occur when only a profit motive is involved, it boggles the mind to think what could happen if there was a case of intentional sabotage.

Such uncertainty about food safety, coupled with the rising cost of transporting food over long distances, may bolster the case of those who advocate buying local food from local producers.


50YearResident 10 years ago

I recently purchased some Beef Franks from a local store. There was no indication of weather they were imported or Made in USA, but were being sold by a USA Company. I put one into my microwave on a paper towel which was on a plate, to heat for 55 Seconds. I was watching the process because I wanted to make sure it did not overcook. I was surprised to see at about 50 seconds into the process there was a flame coming from the center of the frank which ignited the paper towel. It burned a hole about the size of a 5 cent coin on the towel and scorched the plate. Now I want to know what is processed into franks that will cause a fire? It looked like a firecracker when they fizzle instead of explode. Does anyone have an answer?

1Patriot 9 years, 12 months ago

And who is surprized about this article? Check out where that can of green beans in your cupboard came from. USA? I think not. Republic of #@!&%$#!!! Hey! What the @#$%@&!!! Isn't that the country that killed my dog and cat last year with thier tainted pet food?!?!

50YearResident 9 years, 12 months ago

Mike, You nailed the brand! Maybe this is why they recommend heating them in water.....

Commenting has been disabled for this item.