Advertisement

Archive for Sunday, March 23, 2008

John McCain’s ties to Airbus could cost him votes in Kansas

March 23, 2008

Advertisement

— As a reliably red state, Kansas has backed a Republican in each of the last 10 presidential elections. But Democrats say things could be different in 2008.

With their economy strongly tied to aviation and defense jobs, Kansans are riled over the Air Force's decision Feb. 29 to give a $35 billion aerial-tanker contract to a partnership with ties to France, rejecting a bid by Boeing, which would have done final assembly and testing of the planes in Wichita.

As the anger builds, Democrats are reminding voters that Arizona Sen. John McCain, this year's presumed Republican presidential nominee, has a history of sparring with Boeing, which promised to bring 3,800 jobs to Wichita if it won the contract.

"He has made it abundantly clear that, if president, he would be indifferent to the outsourcing of American jobs, even at a time when our families and our nation's economy are hurting the most," said Larry Gates, the chairman of the Kansas Democratic Party.

'A bogus tanker deal'

At a presidential debate in Florida two months ago, McCain boasted that he "saved the taxpayers $6 billion in a bogus tanker deal," a reference to his leading role in stopping a contract between Boeing and the Air Force in 2004 in the face of a procurement scandal that eventually sent Boeing's chief financial officer and a top Air Force acquisitions officer to prison. And in his run for the White House, McCain hired a finance director and several top advisers who'd lobbied on behalf of the European Aeronautics Defense and Space Co., the parent company of Boeing's rival, Airbus.

McCain has come under relentless attack since the Air Force awarded the contract, the second largest in Pentagon history.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of California said the tanker work would be "outsourced" largely because of McCain's opposition. Democratic Rep. Rahm Emanuel of Illinois said the jobs were going overseas "all because John McCain demanded it."

Even Republicans are jumping in.

"Americans are outraged by the Air Force's decision to outsource American jobs," Kansas Republican Rep. Todd Tiahrt said. "As our presumptive Republican presidential nominee, Americans look forward to hearing from him. The more Senator McCain learns about this unfair tanker competition, the more I think he will identify with the outrage Kansans feel."

McCain's campaign declined to comment. But on the campaign trail, he's denied any role in getting the Air Force to award the contract to EADS, which teamed up with a U.S.-based partner, Northrop Grumman.

McCain's opponents said he laid the groundwork for Airbus in 2003, when Congress approved his amendment allowing the Pentagon to buy American military equipment from foreign companies. In 2006, McCain wrote letters to the Defense Department regarding the tanker project. Opponents said the senator was lobbying on Airbus' behalf, but McCain said he was merely calling for an open process that wouldn't exclude Airbus from bidding.

"All the senator advocated for was 100 percent full competition, and that's it," said Keith Ashdown, chief investigator with Taxpayers for Common Sense, a Washington watchdog group.

He applauded McCain's efforts.

Democrats pounce

Sensing a winning issue, Democrats and labor leaders are ready to go national with the brouhaha, hoping that it will cost McCain votes.

As Pennsylvania voters prepare for their primary April 22, their governor, Democrat Ed Rendell, went on national television to tell voters that the Air Force's decision to reject Boeing was wrong and "really unspeakable."

The AFL-CIO accuses McCain of having a consistent anti-worker record in the Senate, and it's sending union protesters to spread the word in Pennsylvania and anywhere else McCain goes until Election Day.

With his ties to Airbus lobbyists, McCain will have a harder time making the argument that he's independent of special interests, said Mike Gaughan, the executive director of the Kansas Democratic Party. He said McCain's refusal to question the Air Force's decision "gives us a glimpse into the kind of economic policy we can expect from a McCain presidency."

Comments

Godot 6 years ago

Well, at least through this process we have uncovered one giant corporation that is a major part of the hated military-industrial complex that earns the protection and adoration of the left. Simply amazing.

0

Marion Lynn 6 years ago

Pisa, you are just too clever for these halfwits!

0

pisafromthewest 6 years ago

dorothyhr (Dorothy Hoyt-Reed) says:

"Now we have to trust people in other countries with the lives of our soldiers."

Whereas it would somehow be better to trust their lives to inferior airplanes, as long as they're stamped "Made in Kansas?" Good plan.

When all you folks get off your indignant high horses, walk away from your computer (made mostly or entirely in Asia), and take a walk around your house (which, while built here, was probably constructed with foreign labor) and make a list of all the purely American made products you own. It won't take long, since there probably aren't any. Then use your Taiwanese cell phone while sitting in front of your Japanese TV to call your friend driving around in his Swedish car and have him turn down his German stereo so he can hear you railing against foreign products costing Americans jobs.

0

beobachter 6 years ago

Bladerunner, does that same thing apply to the prisoners at Gitmo?

0

madmike 6 years ago

I moved to the midwest from Seattle. I always supported Boeing, but when you get caught bribing the government to get a no-bid contract, you are going to pay the price. Unfortunately, that will also include jobs in Kansas and elsewhere. Secondly, Northrup-Grumman in an american company, that will build the blaies in Alabama instead of Seattle and Kansas. There will be no more out-sourcing with Northrup than there would have been with Boeing.

0

beobachter 6 years ago

Mike, you're right, Boeing failed to provide the best plane at the best price that met all the bid specifications. Simple free enterprise as all the conservatives are demanding.

0

Bladerunner 6 years ago

Anyone who spends 5 years of his life starving in a POW camp has earned the right to call his captors anything he wants.

0

madmike 6 years ago

When you three are off your cool-aid binge, let me know. Boeing lost the bid because they couldn't provide the Air Force what they required and they also attempted to bribe DOD employees to get a no-bid contract. Isn't that what you on the left have been complaining about for ever? No-bid contracts being awarded? Or does it only apply when bribery is in your favor?

0

Dorothy Hoyt-Reed 6 years ago

"McCain's opponents said he laid the groundwork for Airbus in 2003, when Congress approved his amendment allowing the Pentagon to buy American military equipment from foreign companies."

This should never been allowed to happen. It's bad enough that the US is becoming a nation of telephone sanitizers who don't produce anything. Now we have to trust people in other countries with the lives of our soldiers. Let's hope they only hire French people who like the United States. What a great way to make our military, our economy, and our country weaker.

0

beobachter 6 years ago

Anything that costs McCain votes is a good thing. We don't need a 3rd Bush term and that's what it would be if McCain's elected.

0

geekin_topekan 6 years ago

Nothing wrong with lining one's pockets.Happens all the time.It's the American way.Lobby a little,sell a product for a little somethinsomthin on the side. I wonder of McCain still uses "tarbaby" and "g00ks" while speaking publicly?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.