Archive for Thursday, June 12, 2008
Coal rejection energizes chamber
Group says it will work to re-elect pro-business lawmakers
June 12, 2008
Advertisement
Topeka — The Kansas Chamber of Commerce is using the defeat of the coal-burning plants in southwest Kansas to raise campaign funds for legislative elections.
Amy Blankenbiller, president and chief executive officer of the chamber, said Wednesday in a fund-raising letter that if the decision against the coal plants is allowed to stand it "will have a chilling effect on Kansas' entire business and manufacturing community."
In an interview, Blankenbiller said candidates' positions on the two 700-megawatt coal-fired plants won't be the only consideration when the PAC decides next week whom to endorse, but it will be one of the main ones.
Last year, Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Roderick Bremby denied permits for the plants, citing concerns with greenhouse gas emissions.
During the recent legislative session, a majority of lawmakers approved bills to require the plants' construction, but Gov. Kathleen Sebelius vetoed each attempt, and the Legislature was unable to muster the two-thirds majority to overturn her vetoes.
Blankenbiller said she has heard of businesses passing over Kansas for other states because of "regulatory uncertainty."
But the Sebelius administration has denied such claims.
"To be clear: There is no 'regulatory uncertainty' in Kansas," Bremby said in a recent article. "KDHE has continued to issue timely air-quality permits."
In the chamber letter, Blankenbiller says the organization will try to re-elect lawmakers who have consistently stood with business, and elect new lawmakers "who realize the well-being of the entire state hinges on the ability of businesses like yours to operate free from burdensome taxes and regulations."
Blankenbiller notes "there is no limit to the amount of money you can contribute to the Kansas Chamber PAC."
More like this
- Coal battle moves to court 53 comments / May 22, 2008
- Environmentalists praise Georgia decision against coal-fired plant 11 comments / July 1, 2008
- Pro coal-plant lawmakers appointed to energy panel 31 comments / July 1, 2008
- 2 coal plant lawsuits tossed 10 comments / July 16, 2008
- Residents rally with Sebelius against coal plants 22 comments / March 12, 2008
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Blog: Palin Book Could Be Your Cheapest Source For Winter Fuel November 20, 2009 · 57 comments
- Mangino denies validity of former player allegations November 19, 2009 · 157 comments
- Blog: We Noticed November 19, 2009 · 115 comments
- Blog: Why Do People Repeat Falsehoods? November 20, 2009 · 47 comments
- Late-night moviegoers flock to 'New Moon' November 20, 2009 · 14 comments
- Lawrence man charged in hit-and-run accident that killed bicyclist November 19, 2009 · 109 comments
- Muslim countries seek blasphemy ban November 20, 2009 · 26 comments
- Nothing to lose: Reeling KU huge underdog for a change November 21, 2009 · 5 comments
- KU's Chancellor issues statement putting support behind Lew Perkins November 20, 2009 · 36 comments
- Not-so-gentle reign November 19, 2009 · 133 comments
- Farmers' Turnpike reopens after four months of construction November 20, 2009
- KU's Chancellor issues statement putting support behind Lew Perkins November 20, 2009
- Commission votes against including gender identity in Lawrence's anti-discrimination policy November 19, 2009
- Sexual healing: Dennis Dailey coaches couples with tough love at his intimacy workshop November 20, 2009
- Tonganoxie child, 2, making remarkable recovery after traumatic accident November 18, 2009
- New, legal, drug has law enforcement concerned — and it's already on a Lawrence store's shelves November 4, 2009
- Phillips County businesses create own hamburger October 2, 2003
- CLARENCE E. RINKE OBITUARY October 19, 1999
- Resident hopes to start rickshaw business in downtown Lawrence, pending city approval November 19, 2009
- KU student pushes button that demolishes a portion of the Kansas Turnpike bridge November 19, 2009
12 June 2008
at 2:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Kropotkin (Anonymous) says…
We can always depend on the David and Charles de Ganahl Koch, worth $17 billion each and tied for the 10th richest Americans and 37th richest persons in the world to chart the Kansas Chamber's course. They will soon pass the four wealthiest heirs of Sam Walton (Wal-Mart) and the owners of Google to vault into the 4th slot amongst Americans. Charles is by far the richest Kansan though David has changed his residence address to NYC.Thanks to those two Kochs, Kansas still has a minimum wage of $2.65 an hour, the lowest in the country, as their lapdog Republican legislature once again succeeded in its two-decade quest to keep tens of thousands of Kansans living in abject poverty. Thanks to the Kochs, the legislature spent the entire session this year trying to force a dirty, coal-fired power plant on Kansans. The U.S., during Bush's term, has experienced the greatest disparity of weath between the richest and poorest Americans since the great depression, another mark that may soon be exceeded. That is precisely where those Koch brothers and their Kansas Chamber want things to be.
12 June 2008
at 6:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cato_the_elder (Anonymous) says…
KCC, good luck in your efforts to support those candidates who favor providing an ever-increasing number of jobs to Kansans through free enterprise and individual initiative, and oppose the use of government intervention and regulation to stifle job growth in our state - which is one state out of fifty in the most affluent nation in the history of the world, the tired, lame views of a few neo-marxists notwithstanding.
12 June 2008
at 8:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
civics (Anonymous) says…
Let's understand the real reason behind their “coal stance.” They have to make amends for scuttling the immigration legislation that the conservatives also wanted. Her comment on burdensome taxes and regulations can be interpreted as any taxes or regulations. Pollute the crap out of the state and pay as little as possible to obtain trained workers and leave the clean up to others. I understand associations are supposed to be self-serving but this outfit takes it to a new level. “Koch”s Northern Division (aka KCCI”)is just getting old.
12 June 2008
at 9:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgeofwesternkansas (Anonymous) says…
All of the “unscrubbed” dirty coal pollution in Kansas is East of Manhattan and Wichita. Sunflower is prepaired to go all in, in devlopment of clean coal generation, and already has the cleanest burning plant in Kansas. It is too bad that the people of Eastern Kansas are not demanding of themselvs what they demand of others. In this state the residents of Eastern Kansas are the problem, they cry like a bitch when westar askes for a tiny 15% increase.
12 June 2008
at 10:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ksyellowdog (Anonymous) says…
One would do well to remember that the best way to live forever is to provide your children a way forward. With that in mind, is it better to pollute our atmosphere for power that can be produced in a non-destructive way, or use the most destructive method we know of? You may call me what you will, but I firmly believe you anti-climate change types should take a different path. After all, what if there is even a small chance we are right about the climate and you did nothing to prevent a horrible future for your grandchildren, and their children. Would you rather be remembered as wise or foolish and wasteful?
12 June 2008
at 11:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
FatTony (Anonymous) says…
Coal fired power plants are antiquated technolgies. Why build something that is out of date before construction even starts. Lets be innovative and lead as opposed to following.
12 June 2008
at 1:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rshrink (Anonymous) says…
The problem is that certain people in the chamber and a few legislators have money tied up in the mining, transporting and burning of coal. They are concerned about their gravy train coming to an end. In the free market system, they should be allowed to fail, especially when 75 % of Kansans don't want dirty energy production. Anyway, if free market takes precedence over the health of the environment, we are all doomed. And, if it is always just a matter of spending more dollars to control the masses, then what kind of democracy do we have? I am not going to go through the science of burning coal again. If cato isn't a scientist, then (s)he is talking out of his/her area. The vast majority of the scientists who study and research in this area have adequately cautioned us against continued usage of coal and the problems we will face if we don't start using clean energy.
12 June 2008
at 2:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
fletch (Anonymous) says…
Oh no, polluters are passing over Kansas! Emergency!
12 June 2008
at 2:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
georgeofwesternkansas (Anonymous) says…
“ksyellowdog (Anonymous) says: One would do well to remember that the best way to live forever is to provide your children a way forward. With that in mind, is it better to pollute our atmosphere for power that can be produced in a non-destructive way, or use the most destructive method we know of?”What is the price tag?? How much does the cost of living go up to change the production infrastructure???Who pays and how much?? You libs are great with ideas, but fall off quick when it requires your money.
12 June 2008
at 2:59 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
toe (Anonymous) says…
Kansas likes taxes, dislikes success, and spends most of its free time arguing. I wonder if other states are like this?
12 June 2008
at 10:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rshrink (Anonymous) says…
To western kansas, it's not liberal money or conservative money, it is taxes which we all pay. Use of coal is more costly now for energy production. That has been proven over and over, but some kansans from the west enjoy ignoring the facts. Maybe western kansas was hoping to finally get a job, thinking maybe he would be one of the 75.
12 June 2008
at 10:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
rshrink (Anonymous) says…
To xd40, better save the coal for plastic goods and start using cheaper cleaner means of making power. Maybe you need to count the number of coal cars going into Lawrence everyday. I have to sit and wait for them to pass many times and go down the tracks probably numerous times a day with more than a hundred cars. That translates into massive pollution and destruction of mountains. That translates into destruction of natures natural bounty, herbal and wildlife. How much are you willing to sacrifice for your power from this source destined to run out?