Archive for Saturday, July 26, 2008
Test of faith: Online religion quizzes offer users fun, faith guidance
July 26, 2008
Advertisement
On the street
How did you decide which religion to follow?
I have many beliefs from a number of different religions, many of which are Christian. I just try to learn as much as I can about other religions and cultures and try to determine the truth for myself.
Quick question: Can a five-minute Web quiz point you down the right religious path for you?
A. Yes
B. No
C. Is this a trick question?
No trick question here, but the right answer is up in the air as hundreds of quizzes float around the Internet promising that with a few clicks of a mouse, you can discover your ideal religion.
From Beliefnet's "Belief-O-Matic" to Quiz Farm's "What religion should u be," the Web is rife with tests, promising that they can, seriously or not-so-seriously, find the right religion for you.
"The ones where you fill out a profile and it gives you an answer about who you are, it's sort of the same principle of those dating sites in some way. I like to call that reverse profiling, because essentially you're telling somebody characteristics and then they're telling you who you are," says David Perlmutter, associate dean for graduate studies and research at Kansas University's School of Journalism. "I think Americans love categories. We love to be told we fit - we're an X personality, or we fit a Z profile. And maybe that's a human tendency, too, that we want to reduce the complexity of the world.
"People are shopping around for religion like they're shopping around for a mate or shopping around for a new car, using the new technologies that are available."
In a U.S. Religious Landscape Survey released by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life in February, 44 percent of Americans polled say they are no longer tied to the religious or secular upbringing of their childhood. They've changed religions or denominations, adopted a faith for the first time or abandoned any affiliation altogether.
Browsing for religion
Peter Luckey, senior pastor at Plymouth Congregational Church, 925 Vt., sees this firsthand from his spot at the pulpit. He often has "church shoppers" show up for a sermon or two, go to a few more churches and then come back, deciding to call Plymouth home.
"It is so American," Luckey says. "We are such individualistically oriented in this country, the idea that you start with yourself and then find a faith that fits with you instead of you trying to fit with a faith. That's totally who we are."
Would people really test the waters of a new religion after taking an online test? Perlmutter doesn't think so, even though he says some of the more serious quizzes might be based on actual research.
"I still think that the commitment to actually being a practicing member of a religion is large enough so that I can't believe people are doing it just based on that little amount of information," he says.
Tim Miller, professor of religious studies at KU, says that though some people might feel pointed in the right direction by the quizzes, he thinks that most of the time these quizzes have the validity of roadside carnival fortune-telling.
"I think more than self-help it's just more of a joke or novelty. It's just something to play with for fun," Miller says. "I think the validity is pretty low."
And even the idea of switching religions doesn't sit well with people of all faiths - done the traditional way with introspection and research or with the help of an online questionnaire. Rabbi Zalman Tiechtel of the Chabad Jewish Center, 1203 W. 19th St., says in Jewish belief, trying to convert and change religions isn't something that makes sense.
"Basic to Jewish belief is that every single human being on the face of this earth must pursue and explore their relationship with God, in the capacity of his or her own life," Tiechtel says. "The traditions with which one is born into and was educated, is the mission which he was entrusted with from above."
Quiz culture
So why are there hundreds of quizzes - 149 on the site Quiz Farm alone - on finding the right religion?
Nancy Baym, associate professor of communications at KU, likens the quizzes to any of the magazine-type quizzes teenagers and adults alike take to find a deeper sense of self.
"Part of it I think, has to do with using the Net as a mirror - a means of gaining greater self-understanding, and part of it has to do with displaying the results to others - think of the 'which Jane Austen heroine are you'-type quizzes on Facebook and elsewhere," Baym says. "Of course, magazines like Cosmo have had zillions of quizzes since way before the Net, so it's not unique to online culture."
Perlmutter says this sort of self-understanding can be traced much further back than the Internet or magazines - to when people first began looking for clues to themselves in the stars.
"The oldest version of this was, of course, the zodiac, so that somehow if the moon is in the tropic of something or other and you're fun-loving and you should marry somebody who's a donkey in the Chinese zodiac," Perlmutter says.
Luckey says, though, that even if the online quizzes are pure fun, the sheer number of them on the Internet does tell us something about ourselves: We are searching.
"People are looking, and they're trying to find out what's this church like, what's the preaching like and what's the message that's being delivered. And that is important, it's absolutely critical to what people are looking for, a message that speaks to them," Luckey says. "But you hope that people go through that and then say, 'I'm going to make a decision and commit myself to this community.' And they're going to make a commitment."
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Sunflower Electric sues state leaders November 19, 2008 · 99 comments
- Blog: Interactive David Bowie Song Title Game November 6, 2008 · 279 comments
- Faith Forum: How should people of faith look at Thanksgiving? November 22, 2008 · 2 comments
- A threat to all November 21, 2008 · 71 comments
- Questioning authorities November 22, 2008 · 5 comments
- Blog: Backyard Fence Blog 4: Cozy Up October 17, 2008 · 447 comments
- Civic illiteracy is alarming November 21, 2008 · 58 comments
- On the street: Which do you prefer, apple or pumpkin pie? November 22, 2008 · 2 comments
- Al-Qaida No. 2 insults Obama in new message November 20, 2008 · 82 comments
- Blog: A Dog, By Any Other Name, Would Still Smell Like A Dog! November 18, 2008 · 140 comments
- Reflections on the 25th anniversary of “The Day After” November 21, 2008
- Two banks in Lawrence call off merger talks November 21, 2008
- Johnson County funds to help improve K-10 Connector service between Lawrence and Overland Park November 20, 2008
- KidCast: Jack Anderson November 17, 2008
- Sebelius considered to be a top contender for three cabinet positions November 21, 2008
- Palin pardons turkey while birds killed in background November 22, 2008
- Dream drive November 22, 2008
- Needless expense November 22, 2008
- Questioning authorities November 22, 2008
- Raised in Kansas: Why I voted for Obama November 15, 2008



26 July 2008
at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
75x55 (Anonymous) says…
How depressing. “People are searching…”
People are searching for whatever makes them feel good. Even at the expense of casting the truth aside, when the truth may not be comfortable or pleasant.
Instead of searching for what fits their preconceived desires - people should search for what is true. Not whatever “message that speaks to them”.
26 July 2008
at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
75x55: “Instead of searching for what fits their preconceived desires - people should search for what is true.”
Problem is, we have to do our searching with fuzzy eyeballs attached to an even fuzzier brain. ( Personally, I'll take *warm* and fuzzy, any day. )
I don't think the problem, so much, is that people are searching.
It's when they've *found* the answer that it becomes depressing.
They get off the train and, eventually, even its whistle fades from memory.
( BTW, in a broader sense, we may not be able to transcend “preconception”
-best to populate our landscapes with as many metaphors as possible.)
26 July 2008
at 9:32 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
yourworstnightmare (Anonymous) says…
Don't believe in fairy tales. Search over. Done. Badabing.
Do you believe in the god with six arms, the one who lives in the sky, or the one with the cat head?
It is all ridiculousness.
Free yourselves from religion and religious thought and nonsense.
26 July 2008
at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
yourworstnightmare: “Don't believe in fairy tales.”
I can't help but believe in fairy tales… subatomic particles, relativity, evolution, cognition… spirituality….)
yourworstnightmare: “It is all ridiculousness.
Free yourselves from religion and religious thought and nonsense.”
tangedit: “It is ALL ridiculousness. Free yourselves.”
26 July 2008
at 10:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
We are all flukes of the universe. We have no right to be here.
26 July 2008
at 10:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
RETICENT_IRREVERENT (Anonymous) says…
We are all flukes of the universe. - bozo
Floundering around in the oceans of god?
26 July 2008
at 10:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
I kinda liked Teilhard's take on man.
Rather than being separate from the universe, man is conceived as an *extension* of the universe-the embodiment of reflective thought,
the universe becoming cognizant of itself.
… the universe's very own ( albeit myopic ) set of fuzzy eyeballs.
26 July 2008
at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
yourworstnightmare (Anonymous) says…
“I can't help but believe in fairy tales: subatomic particles, relativity, evolution, cognition: spirituality:.)”
Wow, you truly are a lost cause. To equate concepts and particles that truly exist (as determined by empirical scientific observation and experimentation) with religious dogma is really an extreme position.
I feel sorry for you, tangenital, with your blindness to science and reality and your silly equivocations and rationalizations. Is this what your religion has taught you? To ignore science and reality? All I can do is shake my head and hope that there are not many like you.
26 July 2008
at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
yourworstnightmare: “Wow, you truly are a lost cause. To equate concepts and particles that truly exist (as determined by empirical scientific observation and experimentation) with religious dogma is really an extreme position.”
Oh, worst, worst, worst…
,;-D
I am not the one who is lost.
I have never been a proponent of religious *dogma*
( or *catma*, for that matter ).