Water challenges / LJWorld.com

Archive for Wednesday, July 23, 2008

A Douglas County water dispute raises issues that illustrate on a small scale why wars someday may be fought over water.

J-W Editorials

July 23, 2008

Our part of eastern Kansas always has been blessed with an adequate - plentiful, compared to much of the state - supply of water. A dispute now playing out in the Eudora area, however, raises a number of issues that may become more urgent as population and the demand for water grow.

The Kansas Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that challenges a new water district's right to use eminent domain to pump groundwater out of the area between Lawrence and Eudora. This is prime Kaw Valley farmland and farmers in that area depend on wells to irrigate their crops.

Now, however, the new Wholesale Water District No. 25 plans to come onto private property and drill test wells in preparation for claiming the right to pump water out of the area and send it to rural water district customers in Douglas, Franklin, Osage and Shawnee counties.

Farmers and other area people interested in expanded food production in the Kaw Valley say that water should stay there and be used for agricultural purposes. The water district says there is more water than current agriculture interests use and the district should be able to use that water to serve its customers, which now number about 10,000 - and growing.

Kansas water law is a complicated area, but as demand for water increases, state lawmakers may have to revisit those laws to find new ways to deal with competing water needs.

From a philosophical standpoint, it seems residences should take precedence because of the basic human need for water. But if those residents were using the water to irrigate their lawns or fill their swimming pools, their "need" might diminish in comparison to the need of people who were producing food for our tables.

The availability of water is important not only to residential development but also to attracting business and industry to an area. If water is pumped from one county to another, the county losing water could also be losing an important economic development advantage for the future.

The rural water districts' current need for additional water may be temporarily addressed by the city of Lawrence, which confirmed Monday that it is working on a contract to sell excess city water to Rural Water District No. 5, one of three districts that formed Wholesale District No. 25. The agreement also would allow the district to install as many water meters as it deems necessary, rather than having that number limited by the city, as it has been in the past.

It remains to be seen whether a contract with the city would cause the rural water districts to back off on their pumping plans, but even if they do, it's likely to be only a temporary respite. As residential development continues in the rural areas of northeastern Kansas, this issue almost certainly will be back on the table within a few years.

Discussion

LJWorld.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

23 July 2008
at 6:55 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

gr (Anonymous) says…

“Now, however, the new Wholesale Water District No. 25 plans to come onto private property and drill test wells in preparation for claiming the right to pump water out of the area and send it to rural water district customers in Douglas, Franklin, Osage and Shawnee counties.”Let us come onto your land so we can shoot you in the foot.Where's bozo with his complaint about exporting something from one area for the benefit of another area?
23 July 2008
at 8:27 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

huntershaven (Anonymous) says…

I have to wonder which is more important: water to drink or food to eat. The answer is that both are important. However, the way that many suburban and urban residents use water in ways that are non-vital such as watering lawns and filling pools, I would hope that the bias is toward farmers.For the long term the wise course of action would be to have city people switch yards to xeroscape type plantings or at least low water demand species if desert style landscaping is not to their liking. Also, agricultural uses ought to think about better ways to grow their crops with less irrigation water or grow what requires less water. We all need water to survive and adaptations will be needed.Out west things are already getting ugly. The next location of the ugliness may be in our own back and front yards as well as our farm fields.
23 July 2008
at 8:38 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

justfornow (Anonymous) says…

A Douglas County water dispute raises issues that illustrate on a small scale why wars someday may be fought over water.I can see it now, Douglas County can raise that Militia Liberals are always talking about and invade Franklin County and commandeer their water. The Militia will to have a “Don't ask don't tell” policy regarding Liberals, because… well you know.
23 July 2008
at 9:59 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

bd (Anonymous) says…

Always one sided stories, the author may want to do some research and find out why these three districts are doing this???Maybe because the City of Lawrance has purchased ALL of the availible water rights at Clinton , or maybe the stranglehold they have had on two of these district the last 10 years????Get all of the facts first!
23 July 2008
at 12:38 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

aeroscout17 (Anonymous) says…

Water law has always been complicated and “wars” (battles) have been fought over the water rights before. There is a difference between how the eastern U.S. and western U.S have interpreted/applied these laws for 100s of years. It won't get easier anytime soon.To the best of my knowledge, if the private landowners didn't sell their water rights, the district can't come onto their land. My guess is the people complaining about the test drilling don't own the rights to the water; that is why the test drilling can commence.