Archive for Monday, July 21, 2008
Judge denies dismissal of Sierra Club lawsuit
July 21, 2008
Advertisement
A federal judge Friday refused to dismiss a Sierra Club lawsuit related to the proposed coal-fired plants in southwest Kansas.
Hays-based Sunflower Electric Power Corp. and a Colorado partner have proposed building two 700-megawatt coal-burning plants near Holcomb.
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' administration has rejected the project based on concerns about climate-changing carbon dioxide emissions.
Sunflower is fighting that decision in state courts.
Meanwhile, the Sierra Club has filed a lawsuit against the federal Rural Utility Service, which gave its permission to Sunflower Electric for the project. The Sierra Club said the federal government should first do a study on the environmental consequences of the project.
On Friday, the federal government sought to dismiss the lawsuit, but a district court judge refused that motion.
More like this
- Sierra Club tries anew to block coal plant 12 comments / August 4, 2009
- Controversial energy project still up in the air 13 comments / June 2, 2007
- Governor vetoes legislation on coal-fired power plants 31 comments / March 21, 2008
- Sierra Club comes under fire during hearing on energy bill 41 comments / February 5, 2009
- Judge says Sebelius deposition will not be rushed 1 comment / March 20, 2009
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- On the street: With the retirement of U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore, what characteristics would you like to see in a new congressman? November 29, 2009 · 13 comments
- Two arrested after altercation at Henry's November 29, 2009 · 8 comments
- Mangino not living on his knees November 29, 2009 · 15 comments
- Jobless recovery will haunt Democrats November 29, 2009 · 9 comments
- Miserable ending November 29, 2009 · 9 comments
- One dead after car-motorcycle accident near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009 · 60 comments
- Senate report: Bin Laden was within grasp of U.S. troops November 29, 2009 · 8 comments
- Poll: Should Mark Mangino be the head coach of the Kansas Jayhawks next season? November 28, 2009 · 10 comments
- Faith Forum: What’s your favorite religious verse? November 28, 2009 · 17 comments
- Blog: Finding Your Creative Side To Gifting November 29, 2009 · 3 comments
- Two arrested after altercation at Henry's November 29, 2009
- KU teams hone ultimate Frisbee skills November 29, 2009
- Reese's Pieces: Kitty Reese screen-prints designs with a darker ‘Holly Hobbie Country Rainbow Brite’ aesthetic November 29, 2009
- Victim ID’d in fatal car-cycle crash November 29, 2009
- Firebirds’ 4-year run notable November 17, 2009
- City caters to its increasingly diverse population with culture, food offerings November 28, 2009
- Leaving Las Vegas: Sin City on losing end of rough economy November 29, 2009
- City commission agenda for Dec. 1 November 28, 2009
- Miserable ending November 29, 2009
- Papa does preach: Call to ministry can run in the family November 28, 2009
21 July 2008
at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
DougCounty (Anonymous) says…
A more complete, better article from subscription site www.eenews.net:Judge refuses to dismiss coal plant expansion case (07/18/2008)Katherine Boyle, E&ENews PM reporterA federal judge refused today to toss out a lawsuit by environmentalists over government approval of loan restructuring that allowed the expansion of a coal-fired power plant in Holcomb, Kan.The Sierra Club argued in the District Court for the District of Columbia that the federal Rural Utilities Service was required by law to weigh the environmental consequences of and possible alternatives to the planned expansion of the Sunflower Electric Power Corp. plant before approving the restructuring.The Justice Department's Brian Toth said the case should be dismissed because the Rural Utilities Service merely approved the deals and did not loan Sunflower money for the expansion. Approvals are not subject to National Environmental Policy Act review, he said, adding that it was in the government's interest to approve the company's loan restructuring to ensure it paid off its government debt.But Nick Persampieri, an Earthjustice attorney representing the Sierra Club, argued the government had subordinated its lien to allow private financing for the new construction.Both sides differed over whether the restructuring approval constituted a major federal action, with the Sierra Club saying it did and the government arguing it was “minor.”Judge Emmet Sullivan said he was troubled that no environmental impact study was required. “This is more than restructuring debt,” he said. “This is restructuring debt with new construction going on.”:The group has until Sept. 8 to amend the complaint. The government will have until Nov. 10 to add documents to the administrative record. Earthjustice will be able to file objections until Dec. 19, and the government must respond by Jan. 21.The judge has scheduled a status hearing for Feb. 19, 2009.Sullivan suggested that in the meantime, the Sierra Club could present a settlement option to the government.But Persampieri said a settlement is not likely. “It's kind of all-or-nothing,” he said, noting that the government would have to agree to an environmental impact statement.”The government has indicated they're not interested at this point,” he added.