Archive for Monday, July 21, 2008
Judge denies dismissal of Sierra Club lawsuit
July 21, 2008
Advertisement
A federal judge Friday refused to dismiss a Sierra Club lawsuit related to the proposed coal-fired plants in southwest Kansas.
Hays-based Sunflower Electric Power Corp. and a Colorado partner have proposed building two 700-megawatt coal-burning plants near Holcomb.
Gov. Kathleen Sebelius' administration has rejected the project based on concerns about climate-changing carbon dioxide emissions.
Sunflower is fighting that decision in state courts.
Meanwhile, the Sierra Club has filed a lawsuit against the federal Rural Utility Service, which gave its permission to Sunflower Electric for the project. The Sierra Club said the federal government should first do a study on the environmental consequences of the project.
On Friday, the federal government sought to dismiss the lawsuit, but a district court judge refused that motion.
Top ads RSS
- ECKAN is now hiring for a full-time Weatherization Outreach Inspector ...
- Asst. Property Manager needed ASAP! Full time, Good benefits. Fax ...
- IRRIGATION TECHNICIAN Full/part time, 785-218-5277 hr@all-n-1-landscape.com
- KU Center for Education
- SECURE YOUR FUTURE! High earnings, creative freedom, lifetime security. Reece ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Couple speak out on transgender issues July 5, 2009 · 47 comments
- Palin links her resignation to ‘higher calling’ July 5, 2009 · 51 comments
- Blog: Name That Tune! July 5, 2009 · 15 comments
- Blog: Sarah Palin: With Interest July 4, 2009 · 137 comments
- Megachurch pastor addresses Muslims July 5, 2009 · 2 comments
- Three detained after Sunday nightclub shooting July 5, 2009 · 47 comments
- Tiller murder suspect advocates ‘justifiable killing’ via mail from jail July 5, 2009 · 27 comments
- Shooting in Douglas County sends Eudora man to hospital, suspect turns gun on himself July 5, 2009 · 25 comments
- Lawrence booms with festivities July 5, 2009 · 26 comments
- Palin to resign as Alaska governor July 3, 2009 · 131 comments
- A new reign: Lawrence landmark the Castle Tea Room open again after extensive renovations July 5, 2009
- Couple speak out on transgender issues July 5, 2009
- U.S. must restore faith in monetary system July 5, 2009
- Lawrence booms with festivities July 5, 2009
- Mass St. momentum July 5, 2009
- CHARLIE HOAG HOPES FOR PLAYING TIME October 10, 1999
- Free State Brewing Co. and WheatFields among 8 Wonders of Kansas Cuisine June 19, 2009
- He made a decision, not ‘a mistake’ July 5, 2009
- Restaurant inspector stresses education July 5, 2009
- School district needs to cut $500K more July 3, 2009
21 July 2008
at 9:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
DougCounty (Anonymous) says…
A more complete, better article from subscription site www.eenews.net:Judge refuses to dismiss coal plant expansion case (07/18/2008)Katherine Boyle, E&ENews PM reporterA federal judge refused today to toss out a lawsuit by environmentalists over government approval of loan restructuring that allowed the expansion of a coal-fired power plant in Holcomb, Kan.The Sierra Club argued in the District Court for the District of Columbia that the federal Rural Utilities Service was required by law to weigh the environmental consequences of and possible alternatives to the planned expansion of the Sunflower Electric Power Corp. plant before approving the restructuring.The Justice Department's Brian Toth said the case should be dismissed because the Rural Utilities Service merely approved the deals and did not loan Sunflower money for the expansion. Approvals are not subject to National Environmental Policy Act review, he said, adding that it was in the government's interest to approve the company's loan restructuring to ensure it paid off its government debt.But Nick Persampieri, an Earthjustice attorney representing the Sierra Club, argued the government had subordinated its lien to allow private financing for the new construction.Both sides differed over whether the restructuring approval constituted a major federal action, with the Sierra Club saying it did and the government arguing it was “minor.”Judge Emmet Sullivan said he was troubled that no environmental impact study was required. “This is more than restructuring debt,” he said. “This is restructuring debt with new construction going on.”:The group has until Sept. 8 to amend the complaint. The government will have until Nov. 10 to add documents to the administrative record. Earthjustice will be able to file objections until Dec. 19, and the government must respond by Jan. 21.The judge has scheduled a status hearing for Feb. 19, 2009.Sullivan suggested that in the meantime, the Sierra Club could present a settlement option to the government.But Persampieri said a settlement is not likely. “It's kind of all-or-nothing,” he said, noting that the government would have to agree to an environmental impact statement.”The government has indicated they're not interested at this point,” he added.