Archive for Thursday, July 3, 2008
County to ponder tightening budget
July 3, 2008
Advertisement
Douglas County Commission
Douglas County commissioners next week will decide which of two bitter tax pills to swallow.
Or they can come up with their own version of mill levy increase poison.
On Monday, County Administrator Craig Weinaug will outline the budget cuts that would be necessary to keep mill levy increases at levels from 2.5 mills to 3.76 mills.
“Obviously, the process is going to be a lot more difficult (than past years),” Weinaug said. “The choices are going to be hard.”
Commissioners said they would spend Monday morning discussing what they prefer to do with the mill levy to support the 2009 county budget.
Then they will spend the next few days meeting with county-supported agencies and department heads about their budgets.
A mill is $1 in taxes for every $1,000 of assessed valuation.
Weinaug has said it would take an increase of 5.75 mills just to maintain services provided in the 2008 budget plus giving a 1 percent cost of living pay increase, and setting aside money for an industrial park.
Declines in county revenue and increased costs are to blame, he said.
In a related budgeting matter, Douglas County Chief Judge Robert Fairchild presented a proposal from a private firm in Denver to study court efficiency.
The National Center for State Courts offered two study options, one costing $35,000 to $65,000 and another costing $35,000 to $49,000.
Fairchild said he also is waiting on a proposal from the Office of Judicial Administration to conduct a study that would be free.
Commissioners made no decision and will wait to see the office’s proposal.
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- College Republicans excited after speech September 5, 2008 · 114 comments
- KU decides whistle will blow again September 5, 2008 · 43 comments
- Palin introduces herself to American public September 4, 2008 · 245 comments
- Weblog: Why Obama Will Be the Next President September 5, 2008 · 22 comments
- Protest reaches milestone September 5, 2008 · 60 comments
- Weblog: Who Do You Look Like? September 5, 2008 · 11 comments
- McCain casts self as reformer September 5, 2008 · 70 comments
- Weblog: Is “blogging” a waste of time? September 5, 2008 · 14 comments
- Palin denounces ‘lies’ about family September 5, 2008 · 70 comments
- Weblog: Obama: "Pal(e) in" Comparison? September 4, 2008 · 103 comments
- KU decides whistle will blow again September 5, 2008
- Google visionary who graduated from LHS urges early access to computers September 5, 2008
- Hypocrisy on Palin daughter September 5, 2008
- Van Go Mobile Arts having moving sale September 5, 2008
- Walking ahead: Postal carrier overcomes polio, accident to deliver mail September 1, 2008
- Dog paddle is the stroke that signals pool’s close September 3, 2008
- KBI, coroner, defendant testify in hit-and-run trial September 5, 2008
- Lions aim to avenge 2007 September 4, 2008
- Band pride September 5, 2008
- Accident fatal on rain-slicked I-70 September 2, 2008


3 July 2008 at 6:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KsTwister (Anonymous) says…
Great, a study to tell us what we already know; past city commissions squandered revenues meant for now. Go figure, much spent on studies too. Now we will need a bypass for a good reason.
3 July 2008 at 7:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
This is pre-emptive action and I don't think raising the mill levy at this time is the right thing to do. The increased mill levy will be applied to the value the appraiser established in March, which does not reflect the 10 to 20 decrease in property values since then.
If the County Commissioners do anything they should shelve the entire idea of funding the purchase of Farmland. Its not like they have to strike while the iron is hot, that there is any competition out there, ready to buy it out from under them. And if there is, then good! Let private industry take on that project.
We are going to get hit with a double whammy on our property tax bills in December - inflated property values and increased mill levies based on an anticipation of reduced property values in the future.
3 July 2008 at 7:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
monkeyhawk (Anonymous) says…
It is past time for the city and the county to make a commitment to the property owners. That commitment should be that they will do everything possible to adjust their own budgets, no matter what it takes, before they raise our taxes. Let's see if they have the guts to do that, before they start running people out of their homes. If it takes eliminating jobs, do it. If it takes cutting back services, other than absolute necessities, do it. If it takes selling a golf course or vanishing a vampire bus service, do it.
The property owners are beyond declaring enough. We want to see action on the part of the taxing entities, and we want to see it now.
3 July 2008 at 7:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
monkeyhawk (Anonymous) says…
…and the headline “County to ponder tightening budget”, is that a mistake? Did Mike Belt mean to say that the county is to ponder HOW to tighten, or are they really just considering IF they will tighten their budgets?
3 July 2008 at 8 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
consumer1 (Anonymous) says…
Kstwister, This is the county budget not the city.
Monkey Hawk, I guess it is okay to fire people as long as it is not you Huh????
How simple minded you are.
3 July 2008 at 8:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
LogicMan (Anonymous) says…
“If the County Commissioners do anything they should shelve the entire idea of funding the purchase of Farmland. Its not like they have to strike while the iron is hot, that there is any competition out there, ready to buy it out from under them. And if there is, then good! Let private industry take on that project.”
Dittos. It's no time to be taking on new projects — wait for less-lean times.
3 July 2008 at 8:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
monkeyhawk (Anonymous) says…
“Monkey Hawk, I guess it is okay to fire people as long as it is not you Huh????
How simple minded you are.”
Talk about simple minded… I suppose it is NOT ok to fire people if IS you? Do you feel that everyone who works for the county and city is entitled to draw a paycheck from the pockets of those unfortunate enough to own property here? Do you feel the only solution is to raise our taxes more to continue to fund all the wasteful items our taxes have gone to in the recent past at the expense of our basic infrastructure? Has the county and the city shown such fiscal prudence in the past that you are certain they always do the right thing to benefit the citizens as a whole? Are you so worried about bus drivers and golf course mowers that you be willing to see elderly folks out on the street?
I used to think you got it.
3 July 2008 at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
consumer1 (Anonymous) says…
Monkey, Granted I was harsh. Sorry about that. I know some county employees who may be the recipient of the county's inability to manage itself. They are wonderful people who have been dedicated to the county for years and because of the county's inabilitiy to manage itself. If these people were to lose their jobs, losing their home is not far behind. I am angry with the county, It seems those in the administration are paid very well, and they seem out of touch with the reality of their little game. So , sorry I harshed on you.
I do get it.
3 July 2008 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion Lynn (Marion Lynn) says…
Just let the Farmland proerty sit.
It's not going anywhere.
3 July 2008 at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
xbusguy (Anonymous) says…
Douglas County has already taxed the lower and middle income folks out. If I could sell my house for what they say it's worth, I would move without hesitation. After three generations of family in Douglas, it's time to get out. So sad.
3 July 2008 at 9:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hawkperchedatriverfront (Anonymous) says…
xbusguy, this county and city so small that it is , just doesn't get it. WE have sadly, leaders that somehow got elected who are so out of touch with thereal world. If the county is going to tighten the budget, cut the budget, then those cuts should not result in a mill levy increase but instead create a mill levy decrease. How can someone like bob johnson, mcelhaney allow this to happen? Two business people who know that if you cut your operating expenses, you can't then raise your rates or price for fencing or whatever. I don't get it and it is obvious they don't either.
3 July 2008 at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
monkeyhawk (Anonymous) says…
Thanks, c1. I really echo your sentiments.
We are in a sad situation, but why does the burden have to keep falling on the same class time after time? There have to be sacrifices everywhere. I am sure most of us have already cut back where we can in order to survive this downturn. We should demand the same of the city and the county. The fat times are gone for now. We are suffering out here, our “leaders” need to listen, and they need to lead by example.
3 July 2008 at 10:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hipper_than_hip (Anonymous) says…
johnson and mcelhaney don't give a hoot about the voters.
3 July 2008 at 10:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
XD40 (Anonymous) says…
Its time for the county, city and school district to begin looking at reducing their spending. There are certain fundamentals we expect: law enforcement, fire protection, infrastructure maintenance (roads, water, sanitary sewer) and the like. Much beyond that gets into luxury territory.
3 July 2008 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Sam_Knowlton (Anonymous) says…
Agree that best return on investment for tax dollars would be in creating more jobs. With the slowdown in job creation and the increase in fuel costs, I wonder if we're going to be saying goodbye to many like you, Xbus.
Wrote about that here http://www.samknowlton.com/?p=20 …
3 July 2008 at 11:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
MattressMan (Anonymous) says…
Both the city and county have plenty of fat that could be trimmed. Problem is nobody on either board wants to be the one to pull the trigger on the waste as they would then be looked upon as the bad guy.
XD40 (Anonymous) says… There are certain fundamentals we expect: law enforcement, fire protection, infrastructure maintenance (roads, water, sanitary sewer) and the like.
I agree XD40 so much more above and beyond that is a luxury. Trim the P&R budgets, fairgrounds, ditch mowing, outside agency funding etc. it can be done but no one is willing to take the first step.
3 July 2008 at 11:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hawkperchedatriverfront (Anonymous) says…
Someone will have to be the bad guy. Budget cuts should result in mill levy decrease. Thanks for the tip about Johnson and McElhaney not caring, it is apparent. Wonder why the J/W isn't interviewing the candidates for county commission and ask them two simple questions.
1. Where would you cut to reduce spending?
2.. How much do you plan to decrease the mill levy.
Those are the questions , Dolph. Saturday Column topic.
After all, if you cut the staff at the J/W to save money, you surely don't plan to raise the price of the paper, when it is given away free anyway.