Archive for Friday, January 4, 2008
Kansans support decision to nix coal plants, want focus on wind energy
January 4, 2008
Advertisement
Poll shows Kansas think state made right decision about coal
The Land Institute poll says that the majority of Kansans support the state's decision to reject two coal-fired energy plants. Enlarge video
Topeka — Kansans support the state's recent rejection of coal-fired power plants by a 2-1 margin, according to new poll results.
"This is a crucial moment in our history," Nancy Jackson, spokeswoman for the Climate and Energy Project of The Land Institute, which commissioned the poll, said Thursday. The poll also found that three out of four Kansans want the state to increase its commitment to wind-powered energy.
Supporters of the plants proposed by Sunflower Electric Power Corp. dismissed the poll.
Sunflower spokesman Steve Miller noted that the Salina-based Land Institute opposed the two 700-megawatt plants.
"It is not surprising," Miller said, that the institute focusing on renewable energy and agriculture "would commission a poll for publicity purposes."
Bob Kreutzer, who leads a group of Kansas businesses supporting construction of the plants in western Kansas, said the poll failed to ask more meaningful questions.
"Had they asked, 'Are you willing to pay twice what you're paying now for electricity?' it might have been a little different," Kreutzer said.
On Oct. 18, Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Roderick Bremby rejected the plants near Holcomb, citing concerns about carbon dioxide emissions and global warming. Most scientists believe increased CO2 emissions are causing climate change.
The poll, done in November by Cooper & Secrest Associates of Alexandria, Va., showed that 62 percent of Kansans support Bremby's decision and 31 percent oppose it. The survey had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percent.
"That is a pretty healthy endorsement of this decision," said pollster Allen Secrest during a teleconference with Jackson and reporters across the state. And, he said, support of Bremby's decision was high among Democrats and Republicans.
More than 1,000 people were surveyed, including an over-sample in the 1st Congressional District, which would have been the site of the plants.
Even in the 1st Congressional District, KDHE's decision was supported 51 percent to 40 percent with 9 percent unsure.
The largest margin of support was in the 3rd Congressional District, which includes east Lawrence, at 70 percent. The second District, which includes west Lawrence, and fourth District, which includes Wichita, both were at 62 percent support.
Sunflower and its co-developers have appealed the KDHE decision to the Kansas Supreme Court, and state legislative leaders have vowed to try to overturn Bremby's ruling in the legislative session that starts Jan. 14.
Kreutzer of Garden City said he was one of the western Kansans actually polled over the telephone by Cooper and Secrest.
He said the poll seemed slanted against the plants because the questions failed to provide information about what he said were inconsistencies in state energy policy.
But Secrest and Jackson said the questions were balanced.
"We went some distance out of our way to articulate both sides," Secrest said.
Jackson said much of the polling was done to help guide strategies of the institute so it would have been foolish to skew the questions.
Jackson and Secrest did not reveal all of the poll results, but Jackson said the survey indicated that concern about the environment is among the top issues in the state.
Top ads RSS
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Move over! July 5, 2009 · 7 comments
- Shooting in Douglas County sends Eudora man to hospital, suspect turns gun on himself July 5, 2009 · 30 comments
- Tiller murder suspect advocates ‘justifiable killing’ via mail from jail July 5, 2009 · 28 comments
- Couple speak out on transgender issues July 5, 2009 · 49 comments
- Palin links her resignation to ‘higher calling’ July 5, 2009 · 53 comments
- Poll: What do you do when you have a bad experience at a restaurant? July 5, 2009 · 16 comments
- Blog: Sarah Palin: With Interest July 4, 2009 · 137 comments
- Three detained after Sunday nightclub shooting July 5, 2009 · 48 comments
- Blog: Name That Tune! July 5, 2009 · 17 comments
- Lawrence booms with festivities July 5, 2009 · 27 comments
- A new reign: Lawrence landmark the Castle Tea Room open again after extensive renovations July 5, 2009
- Couple speak out on transgender issues July 5, 2009
- Lawrence booms with festivities July 5, 2009
- 1999 murder case won’t settle July 5, 2009
- He made a decision, not ‘a mistake’ July 5, 2009
- Free State Brewing Co. and WheatFields among 8 Wonders of Kansas Cuisine June 19, 2009
- U.S. must restore faith in monetary system July 5, 2009
- Restaurant inspector stresses education July 5, 2009
- CHARLIE HOAG HOPES FOR PLAYING TIME October 10, 1999
- School district needs to cut $500K more July 3, 2009
4 January 2008
at 7:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mooner (Anonymous) says…
Here is what they asked in the poll .. :
http://www2.ljworld.com/documents/200…
4 January 2008
at 8:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
coldandhot (Anonymous) says…
Rothschild outscooped again.
Not so fast…Cooper & Secrest Associates is the official pollster of the Kansas Democratic Party and Kathleen Sebelius. However, as we all are well aware by now, the Kansas media run with this as a “fair and balanced” poll.
The “important” papers know the connections now, a poll from Cooper & Secrest (a company that has received hundreds of thousands from Kansas Democrats) is not an accurate poll. it stinks.
4 January 2008
at 8:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
coldandhot (Anonymous) says…
Today's Lawrence Journal-World quoted a poll in which Kansans supposedly reject coal-fired power plants:
Kansans support the state's recent rejection of two coal-fired power plants by a two-to-one margin, according to a poll released today.
In addition, three out of four Kansans want the state to increase its commitment to wind-powered energy, according to the poll conducted on behalf of The Land Institute, a Salina-based organization that focuses on renewable forms of energy and agriculture.
On Oct. 18, Kansas Department of Health and Environment Secretary Roderick Bremby rejected the plants in western Kansas proposed by Sunflower Electric Power Corp., citing concerns about carbon dioxide emissions and global warming.
The poll, done in November by Cooper and Secrest Associates of Alexandria, Va., showed that 62 percent of Kansans support Bremby's decision and 31 percent oppose it.
But why didn't the Lawrence Journal-World give any of the the connections between Cooper and Secrest Associates and the Kansas Democratic Party and the hundreds of thousands the KDP has paid Cooper and Secrest over more than a decade? Even a KU press release from late last year identified the head of this company as a Democratic pollster:
KU press release: Media advisory: Dole Institute to host conference on midterm election results, Dec 6, 2006
- Alan Secrest, president and CEO, Cooper & Secrest Associates Inc.; Democratic pollster
Who is Alan Secrest and what are his political leanings?
Alan Secrest: all in the numbers — Democratic pollster — Movers & Shakers, Campaigns & Elections, Oct-Nov, 1993.
* Democratic pollster Alan Secrest first “caught the political bug” in the 1972 George McGovern presidential campaign
* Secrest is one of the most successful Democratic pollsters because of his devotion to in-depth questionnaires and analysis.
Here's an overview of Secrest's company:
Cooper and Secrest Associates Inc.
Private Company, Headquarters Location
228 S Washington St., Ste. 330, Alexandria, VA, United States
(703)683-7990, (703)739-0079 fax,
Primary SIC: Services, Not Elsewhere Classified, Primary NAICS: Other Scientific and Technical Consulting Services
Description: Services: Political consulting firm which specializes in public opinion polls for Democratic candidates. Firm also does polling work for non-candidates, such as associations and lobbying organizations.
4 January 2008
at 11:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
So, are you saying that the poll results are wrong, hotandcold? If so, what are the “real” feelings of Kansans, and what Republican-biased poll tells you so?
4 January 2008
at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
a_flock_of_jayhawks (Anonymous) says…
coldandhot,
Since you seem to know so much about polling (which I suspect you don't), why don't you formulate your own poll and publish the results? Be sure to provide the methodology, results, and analysis of the poll so that others can verify your work and conclusions.
If you are not willing (or able) to do this or at least speak to these items in the poll, your opinion is just that — an opinion, and a pretty empty one. If you really want to learn more, study sociology.
4 January 2008
at 11:51 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Centerville (Anonymous) says…
Hot and Cold,
Thank you for doing the work that our LJW refuses to do. Coverage of anything involving Sebilious is a joke. We owe you for connecting the dots that usually remain unconnected.
4 January 2008
at 1:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
a_flock_of_jayhawks (Anonymous) says…
ha ha, R_T. very funny. Damn the planet 'cause we're all too comfortable with the way things are. Oh, and leave it for future generations to handle and make the necessary sacrifices. Very convenient, seeing as they probably will never get the chance to look us in the eye and ask “why?”
Some people just need to be dragged kicking and screaming into doing what they should.
4 January 2008
at 4:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Reality_Check (Anonymous) says…
When you don't like the message, shoot the messenger. Never admit that a majority might think differently than you do. That's been the Right Wing tactic forever. The problem is, the American people see through your crap now. They aren't going to fall for it for at least another generation because all they got was war, a 50% larger national debt, and a crumbling middle class. Your time came and went and you squandered it. Ha, ha.
4 January 2008
at 4:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Reality_Check (Anonymous) says…
So, what about all those polls, for the last 30 years, showing the vast majority of Americans support abortion rights? They must all have been sponsored by Democrats, right?
Heck, Gallup, Harris and the rest must be a bunch of leftist Democrats whenever their results don't agree with your far right beliefs, right?
How about this; Grow up and admit when you're whipped.
4 January 2008
at 8:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
coldandhot (Anonymous) says…
Not saying the poll is wrong…just letting folks know who's behind the poll and what that organization is about. Basically, doing Rothschild's job. Letting people know the whole story.
4 January 2008
at 9:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
“just letting folks know who's behind the poll and what that organization is about.”
No, you merely spammed us with vague, ad hominem innuendo.
5 January 2008
at 3:21 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
LeviCircle (Anonymous) says…
This story is a nice P.R. piece…but nothing more. If the Kansans For Life folks released a poll saying that 64% of the public wanted abortion completely outlawed, I wouldn't believe that any more than I'd believe a Planned Parenthood poll saying that 64% of the public wanted no restrictions on abortion at all.
While Mr. Jackson is undoubtedly a nice man, he and his associated organizations have, from the beginning, been very publicly opposed to the Holcomb plant. The polling firm they hired has done hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of polling for Kansas Democrats for years.
Yes, I've read the actual poll questions. Yes, they got the result they wanted. No, I don't have ANY confidence this poll is accurate…and no, I wouldn't believe a poll paid for by Sunflower Energy, either.
Shame on the J-W for giving this political puff piece the title of “news”. The sales department should have been given this - it's political advertising.
5 January 2008
at 8:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
dirkleisure (Anonymous) says…
Levi, how would you have asked the questions?
Your argument would be understandable if the poll had generated a slim majority or perhaps even a plurality.
It did not. It generated a large majority. How would you have asked the question, and what response do you think you would have received?
You cannot criticize the questions without offering specifics.
23 April 2008
at 7:55 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
situveux1 (Anonymous) says…
Actually, it's perfectly acceptable to criticize the questions without saying what should have been asked. By saying someone should put forth their own questions, you're simply trying to divert the discussion away from a very real concern…that the pollsters were not only biased, but had a significant interest in getting results that would push an agenda. My thanks to cold and hot for publishing what he has.In addition, you can go to page 33 of http://ethics.ks.gov/CFAScanned/StWid… and see an expenditure of $9,475 by Kathleen Sebelius' campaign to Cooper and Secrest for “Research”. The expenditure is dated 11/30/07, just under 1 month before the release of the poll.http://www.climateandenergy.org/_FileLibrary/FileImage/CSecrestKSClimateMemo.pdfHere you can read the poll questions for yourself.The questions really don't matter to me anymore. I think they could have been phrased differently, but in the end I can't trust a polling company that may have been paid by Sebelius herself. I'm sure Neufeld's poll would have shown support just as much as this poll showed opposition.
23 April 2008
at 8:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Multidisciplinary (Anonymous) says…
How to Build Your Own Wind Farm. (I knew someone had to have made a site for this )Go for it. =Dhttp://www.treehugger.com/files/2006/06/how_to_build_yo_1.php
23 April 2008
at 8:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beobachter (Anonymous) says…
Sounds like far too many here, especially the power plant supporters have a single agenda. Reminds me of a very old saying, my minds made up, don't confuse me with facts. Seems an awful lot of people simply hate the governor because she's a Democrat, nothing she can ever do is right. Same mindset of those who believe W can do no wrong. Wake up and think for yourselves, stay off the single issue websites and read and look at information that doesn't only support what you've already decided is correct.
23 April 2008
at 8:47 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
“Why do loons sit around and spend all their energy stopping logical human progress an then never doing anything that they insist must happen?*Spoken slowly and with excessive disgust.*Just//////build/////the/////god/////damned/////wind/////farms!!!!!!!!!”So, I guess this means that if you prefer coal plants that you are busy building one in your backyard.
23 April 2008
at 9:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Finding_Uranus (Anonymous) says…
It's not been so long since people were overjoyed that the farm windmill and the horse were replaced by electricity and the automobile. Maybe not so long ago as when some of were born, or slightly before. So here we are saying that humans have wrecked the earth. In one human lifetime? ooooooooK–whatever.
23 April 2008
at 9:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
situveux1 (Anonymous) says…
“Seems an awful lot of people simply hate the governor because she's a Democrat, nothing she can ever do is right.”Dude, there's just as many who think she can do no wrong and W can do no right. What's the difference?