Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Military religion suit expanded

December 30, 2008

Advertisement

— A newly expanded federal lawsuit alleged Monday that the military doesn’t take complaints of religious discrimination seriously enough and allows personnel to try to convert Muslims in Iraq and Afghanistan to Christianity.

The Military Religions Freedom Foundation and a Fort Riley, Kan., soldier suing Defense Secretary Robert Gates now allege that a bias toward evangelical Christianity pervades even the Army’s suicide prevention manual and the Air Force’s sponsorship of an evangelical motocross ministry.

The Defense Department said complaints about religious discrimination are relatively few and pointed to military policies against endorsing any religious view.

Spc. Dustin Chalker and the Military Religious Freedom Foundation filed their amended lawsuit in U.S. District Court in Kansas City, Kan. They filed the original lawsuit in September.

Chalker, a combat medic, is an atheist whose original complaints included being forced to attend military formations where Christian prayers were given. The foundation, based in Albuquerque, N.M., says it represents about 11,000 military personnel, almost all of them Christians upset about what they view as discrimination by more conservative and evangelical personnel.

“Our amended complaint is specifically designed to further stab at the throbbing unconstitutional heart of darkness that comprises the systemic fundamentalist Christianity so pervasive and pernicious in today’s American armed forces,” said Mikey Weinstein, the foundation’s president.

Defense Department spokeswoman Eileen Lainez said the agency doesn’t comment on pending lawsuits. But she said it has identified fewer than 50 complaints about alleged violations of religious freedoms during the past three years, with 1.4 million personnel in uniform.

She also noted a policy that says, “The Department of Defense places a high value on the rights of members of the Armed Forces to observe the tenets of their respective religions.”

Weinstein said Chalker had attempted in recent months to pursue his complaints within the Army but has been told they were “unfounded.”

The amended lawsuit said the foundation has “a number of well-documented reports” from others about unsuccessful attempts to resolve such issues. It said the military has failed to “adequately address complaints.”

The amended lawsuit also added examples of what Weinstein called “the noxiously unconstitutional pattern and practice of fundamentalist Christian oppression” within the armed forces.

Comments

BuffyloGal 5 years, 3 months ago

With Steve Martin on the other page, I have Monty Python and Mel Brooks running through my head on this one. 2009 should be fun!

0

O_Bugpoo 5 years, 3 months ago

Freedom of religion not freedom from religion. The specialist needs to seek an early discharge if he is that sensitive.

0

tangential_reasoners_anonymous 5 years, 3 months ago

“the noxiously unconstitutional pattern and practice of fundamentalist Christian oppression”... it's the latest fashion.

0

BuffyloGal 5 years, 3 months ago

I thought the fashion articles were on Mondays.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.