Archive for Wednesday, August 20, 2008
A human side?
Why should we care whether William Quantrill had an unpleasant relationship with his mother?
August 20, 2008
Advertisement
It is difficult to believe we need a book purporting to show the "human side" of William Quantrill, who led the devastating 1863 raid on Lawrence. Who really cares, except perhaps devotees of the Confederacy, who still are inclined to consider this murderer a hero. The author of the novel "I, Quantrill" says the fictionalized story is designed to remind readers that the raid leader was just a man, not a demon.
It might be hard to sell that view to the families of the 180 men and boys killed by Quantrill's raiders, who burned and looted everything they could in Lawrence. The 244-page book notes that Quantrill died in 1865 in Kentucky after being shot by Union supporters. Most of us familiar with the depth and scope of the atrocities committed in that 1863 slaughter are inclined to hope he suffered.
Why waste time trying to generate sympathy for Quantrill's outlawry and bloodlust by suggesting they were at least partially a byproduct of a strained relationship with his mother. How did Adolf Hitler, Josef Stalin and Attila the Hun get along with their mothers?
In the violent days of border wars involving Kansas and Missouri, raids took countless lives, and Kansans known as jayhawkers engaged in their share of murder and mayhem. Fortunately such activities have been transformed into less sanguinary athletic and commercial rivalries in this day and age.
As for the heroic status of Quantrill among Missourians (some of whom still contend he did only what was necessary), well into the 1900s the Lawrence raiders and their families held annual gatherings to "celebrate" what happened here in 1863. That is a "human side" we should understand and appreciate? For them it was "a war between the states," which is designed to sound more humane. It was never that pretty.
Jonathan Earle, a Civil War historian and author at Kansas University, doesn't hesitate to declare that despite any kind and commendable deeds Quantrill may have done along the way, the man's reputation is "unrehabilitatable" - if not in parts of Missouri, certainly throughout this region of Kansas.
"I, Quantrill" by Max McCoy is regarded as a fictional effort, which seems to put into perspective any efforts to depict William Quantrill as having a "human side." The bottom line is that he was in many ways a monster who deserves no sympathy for the life he led.
More like this
- Devil's advocate: Emporia author seeks to humanize Quantrill 70 comments / August 12, 2008
- NOT IN THE DETAILS November 14, 1999
- Quantrill's legacy differs on each side of border 10 comments / August 21, 2005
- S FAMILY February 13, 1998
- Wrong conclusion 3 comments / September 30, 2008
Top ads RSS
- Tonganoxie Nursing is now hiring for: LPN-Part Time 2PM-10PM & ...
- Project Coordinator The KS Biological Survey at the University of ...
- INSURANCE ASSISTANT Immediate part to full-time Assistant with life, accident ...
- Floor Tech/Floater Sun.-Thurs., 2-4 hrs. per night, start at 5:00 ...
- Part-time CNA needed immediately to help our elderly clients in ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- FINAL: Ressel's last-second field goal gives MU 41-39 victory over KU November 28, 2009 · 85 comments
- One dead after car-motorcycle accident near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009 · 56 comments
- Woman sees image of Jesus on her iron November 28, 2009 · 42 comments
- Faith Forum: What’s your favorite religious verse? November 28, 2009 · 15 comments
- Woods hurt in accident November 28, 2009 · 23 comments
- Fear tactics November 27, 2009 · 46 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 108 comments
- Mangino 'optimistic' he'll return next season November 28, 2009 · 16 comments
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 78 comments
- Poll: Should the Kansas Legislature pursue opportunities to privatize or outsource some government services? November 27, 2009 · 20 comments
- Victim ID’d in fatal car-cycle crash November 29, 2009
- Top-rated basketball recruit Bradley Beal to make college choice Monday November 28, 2009
- St. Louis hoops recruit has KU on top list September 4, 2009
- Lawrence City Commission expected to approve $800,000 in improvements to Kasold Drive November 27, 2009
- Firebirds’ 4-year run notable November 17, 2009
- Market features exotic holiday gifts November 28, 2009
- Mammogram message poorly framed November 28, 2009
- City caters to its increasingly diverse population with culture, food offerings November 28, 2009
- City commission agenda for Dec. 1 November 28, 2009
- Two arrested after altercation at Henry's November 29, 2009
20 August 2008
at 7:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
canyon_wren (Anonymous) says…
I agree! The sophists in our society today are bent on minimizing the good qualities of our past heroes (Lincoln, et al.) and excusing the bad ones of our villains. Nothing seems to escape their determination to reduce everything in our past to some wishy-washy interpretation. It's so sad!
20 August 2008
at 9:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Reaper2K (Anonymous) says…
The world is not so black-and-white as some would believe. While it is easy to vilify those who have done evil deeds, it is important to remember that many such men and women do so thinking only of the good that they can accomplish. The goal of a novel like I, Quantrill is not to excuse such behavior, but to understand it. This is why we study history and why many people are fascinated by the lives of both the heroes and the villains.
20 August 2008
at 9:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Baille (Anonymous) says…
Why should we care about what some editorial writer thinks about anything?The book on Quantrill has the same type of scholarly value as books on Alexander the Great (or Terrible, depending on which side of the wall you sat), William Wallace, General Sherman, Genghis Khan, Lao Tzu, and on and on and on. Heroes and villains are defined by the victors and the victims. I am sure that the Cheyenne look upon the Sand Creek Massacre as something akin to Quantrill's raid, and yet would anyone argue that a fact-based, objective view of what led to our soldiers committing that massacre would have no value? What about in the cyclical nature of such things, e.g. the years of violence at Pine Ridge reservation that was encouraged by the FBI and our federal and state government? Does Matthiesson's book have no value because it looks at the Peltier case objectively?Books such as these have value. What made people of historical significance tick gives us insight into the human condition. Scholarly books about these people, historical accounts: these things work together to educate us about our past. They help us move past the black and white worldview born of understandably emotional reactions to horrific events and people who have done very bad things and look at the whys and wherefores.What is sad is the continued insistence on painting history as a narrative made up of heroes and villains rather than a complex interplay between a variety of forces, interest groups, and external forces.
20 August 2008
at 9:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunshine_noise (Anonymous) says…
I see no point in wasting time humanizing any person who commits such horrible and devastating crimes against humanity. I see this happening too often in our society today - humanizing evil and criticizing good. It is what it is -evil is evil no matter what. Society is suffering from this ping-ponging back and forth trying to decide which way to be. I just don't want to believe we can turn evil into something positive. There is nothing positive about evil doers. Let evil and evil doers sink into the depths of where it came from and let us focus on the good of mankind instead of trying to condemn it or compete with it. Just “Let It Be”
20 August 2008
at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
lawrencian (Anonymous) says…
Every person is “human” — and even as a Lawrence native, I don't think that Quantrill rates being compared to Hitler, Stalin or Attila the Hun!
20 August 2008
at 11:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mom_of_three (Anonymous) says…
Oh, I was going to stay out of this discussion, but I can't. I have to disagree. In this case, the ends do justify the means. If people who wanted to end slavery didn't do anything (i.e. John Brown, anti-slavery societies, Harriet Tubman, etc), then slavery would have taken longer to extinguish. I don't have to like the methods, but I have to respect that people took a stand.
20 August 2008
at 3:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
75x55 (Anonymous) says…
“In this case, the ends do justify the means.”Essentially, the very same argument used by secessionists to split with the United States, given that the “state right” in question was being threatened by the westward expansion of non-slave states, and the subsequent loss of 'parity' in Congress. “ends justifying the means” is an extremely vague phrase, and leaves too much wiggle space to avoid related concepts such as authority and morality pertaining to the use of violence as a change agent.
20 August 2008
at 3:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
JayCat_67 (Anonymous) says…
Coming soon to a book store near you, “I, Bin Laden”…
20 August 2008
at 4:12 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Quigly (Anonymous) says…
It didn't matter what side of the fence you were on. I can't even believe a con artists like him got into the same sentence as William Wallace and the others. Who are you? Even then the people knew he was a pompous con artist. The only thing he cared about was the General's uniform he worked so hard to get. You cannot even compare him with anyone famous. I can 5 Red Legs that were complete and utter psychopaths that were smarter than Quantrill. Not to mention Senator Lane. There was a reason he was buried in an unmarked grave. What a waste of time and effort when they could have done something about a dozen of the Raiders who are worthy of a book. Yet still this opportunistic, self-righteous, con artists gets books left and right. I am going to write a book now.” George Bush, Genius of the Century”
20 August 2008
at 4:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
pdecell (Paul Decelles) says…
Maybe the editor is uncomfortable with the notion that “decent” people are capable of really despicable acts.
20 August 2008
at 5:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
cato_the_elder (Anonymous) says…
Outstanding editorial. Great job, J-W editorial staff.
20 August 2008
at 5:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Bodan (Sandra Willis) says…
He is dead - as far as I can see, anything written that depicts him as other than a bad man must be related to him.
22 August 2008
at 7:39 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Lynn731 (Anonymous) says…
All of your liberals would say, he was just misunderstood. Thank you, Lynn