Archive for Saturday, April 26, 2008

Tentative farm bill deal reached

April 26, 2008


— Congressional negotiators reached a tentative agreement Friday on a multibillion-dollar farm bill that includes a hefty increase for nutrition programs at a time of rising food prices.

An intense series of closed-door bargaining sessions over how to pay for the five-year, roughly $280 billion bill ended Friday afternoon with senior Democrats expressing optimism that they would soon be sending the measure to President Bush.

"I don't think there's any question now that we can get this done by the eighth of May," said Rep. Collin C. Peterson, the Minnesota Democrat who heads the Agriculture Committee.

A key breakthrough came when senior lawmakers, after an hours-long huddle in an ornate room in the Capitol, agreed on a $1.7 billion package of tax breaks to be included in the bill, and on how to finance the overall package.

The outline includes an $861 million increase for nutrition programs, partially paid for by slashing crop subsidies by $400 million and cutting a program to pay farmers for ruined crops by $250 million.

Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., said the shift was "urgently needed because of the run-up in food costs and food prices."

It also reflected the political and economic realities surrounding this year's tough farm bill talks. With crop prices high and the federal budget squeezed, there's less appetite in Washington for big farm programs, especially among congressional leaders who hail from urban areas. The sharp economic slump has many lawmakers focused more on job losses and home foreclosures than farm policy.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and Rep. Charles B. Rangel, D-N.Y., the Ways and Means Committee chairman, pushed hard for the nutrition boosts.

"A lot of painful reductions (had) to be made in order to shift resources to places that are being hard hit by this weakening economy," Conrad said.

With the increases, Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, the Agriculture Committee chairman, said two-thirds of farm bill resources would go to nutrition.

"We carried a heavy load for nutrition," Harkin said. "It's not just a farm bill. This is a farm and a food and an energy bill."

To close stubborn funding gaps, negotiators agreed to cut an ethanol tax credit that has previously been seen as untouchable because of its popularity in politically potent Iowa. They sliced $1 billion in support for blending fuel with the corn-based additive, bringing the per-gallon credit from 51 cents to 45 cents.

They boosted support for another form of the clean-burning fuel additive - cellulosic ethanol, which is made from plant matter - by $400 million.


bearded_gnome 9 years, 12 months ago

well, we'll see if this really goes through! this bill balences the budget on the backs of farmers, who already gamble on the weather/disease, etc. it is not wise to make farming less profitable...that's one way to reduce overall yields. stupid dem congressmen! no, need to make farming more profitable because of the global famine.stop the ethanol subsidies that divert resources to growing inetibles instead of growing etible corn! "A lot of painful reductions (had) to be made in order to shift resources to places that are being hard hit by this weakening economy," Conrad said.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.