Archive for Tuesday, April 22, 2008

Abortion restrictions vetoed

April 22, 2008

Advertisement

— Gov. Kathleen Sebelius vetoed a bill Monday that would have imposed new restrictions on abortion providers and allowed lawsuits to block late-term procedures, arguing it could deny women lifesaving medical care.

But abortion opponents scoffed at her arguments and said Sebelius' action shows she holds radical views. Some supporters of the bill predicted an attempt to override Sebelius' veto when the Legislature returns April 30 from its annual spring break.

The measure was partly a response to allegations that Dr. George Tiller has performed illegal late-term abortions at his Wichita clinic. Tiller, among the few U.S. physicians who perform such procedures, has said he follows state law.

Sebelius, an abortion-rights supporter, objected most strongly to provisions allowing a patient's spouse or family members to go to court if they believed a doctor had performed or was about to perform an illegal late-term abortion. The patient herself also could sue, but so could a local prosecutor.

The governor said in her veto message that such a lawsuit could be filed to block a patient's abortion "even where it may be necessary to save her life." She said the bill would encourage litigation and jeopardize patients' privacy.

"I am concerned that the bill is likely unconstitutional or, even worse, endangers the lives of women," she wrote. "As governor, nothing is more important to me than the safety, health and privacy rights of our citizens."

Abortion opponents said the bill would protect patients from being coerced into having abortions, particularly minors. Also, they noted that some provisions were designed to increase the amount of information patients receive before having their pregnancies terminated.

For example, doctors using ultrasound or monitoring fetal heartbeats would have to make information from those sources available to a patient at least 30 minutes before an abortion. Also, doctors would have to tell their patients whether their fetuses are viable and, if not, why.

The bill also allows a former patient or her family to sue a doctor for monetary damages if she believes a pregnancy was improperly terminated.

Comments

Kufan57 7 years ago

Couldnt agree with you more...

kansanjayhawk 7 years ago

Governor Sebelius is not "pro-choice" she is Pro-abortion! Her actions defending Dr. Tiller and the late-term abortion industry in Kansas have made her outrageous position perfectly clear. She is no "moderate" when comes to snuffing out the innocent little lives of unborn children!

staff04 7 years ago

"The governor said in her veto message that such a lawsuit could be filed to block a patient's abortion "even where it may be necessary to save her life.""How anybody could force a woman to give birth when there is certain chance she would (and often the child as well) die in the process is beyond me...

kansanjayhawk 7 years ago

Should her nefarious tendencies surprise us? She has the Nazi philosophy of certain persons being "valued" and others "devalued" to the point of having their very lives being taken by the bloody abortionists knife!

jafs 7 years ago

Something has always confused me a bit:The "pro-life" movement seems to value life before it's born, but then once a child is born, they're usually on their own.I'm sure this isn't true of all "pro-life" supporters, but many conservative folks seem to forget about caring for the lives of children and adults in our society.

Corey Williams 7 years ago

That and they don't care about how to truly stop abortion: education and contraceptives. They just want to make it illegal. If you don't like it, don't have one. Simple as that.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.