Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, September 29, 2007

New profs must pass criminal checks

KU doesn’t have similar requirement

September 29, 2007

Advertisement

On the street

Do you think university professors should have to pass a criminal background check?

Yeah. For me, it would be important to know if my professor was involved in any type of violent or sexual crime.

More responses

Newly hired professors at the University of Missouri's four campuses will soon join the ranks of rank-and-file employees who must pass criminal background checks before joining the payroll.

The revised policy takes effect Monday at the system's campuses in Columbia, Rolla, St. Louis and Kansas City.

Current employees facing promotions and transfers will also undergo the background checks, which will be performed by Kansas City-based Validity Screening Solutions, a private firm.

The change includes part-time and temporary workers but does not apply to student workers.

University of Missouri system employees other than professors have been subject to criminal background checks for the past decade. The new policy will ensure that all employees, whether faculty or staff, are treated the same, said Karen Touzeau, assistant vice chancellor of human resource services.

Kansas University spokeswoman Jill Jess said KU does not perform criminal background checks on faculty members.

For staff and student hourly workers, KU asks for a voluntary disclosure of past convictions on applications. KU also checks the sex offender registry list, she said.

In Missouri, the Missouri State Highway Patrol previously performed the university's background checks on staff members. Validity Screening Solutions offers a more comprehensive, national inquiry, Touzeau said.

Some faculty members are concerned about the new policy. Frank Schmidt, a biochemistry professor and chairman of the Columbia campus' faculty council, called criminal background checks "notoriously inaccurate."

Someone with a common name, such as John Smith, is "going to show up on all kinds of stuff," he said.

Criminal background checks could also interfere with academic freedom and civil rights, Schmidt said. He emphasized that the relevance of the offense is something the administration should study before hiring a candidate.

"There may be some cases where it is appropriate (to disqualify someone from a position) for example, someone who has a string of convictions for careless and imprudent driving not being allowed to take students on a university-sponsored trip," Schmidt said. "If it's not relevant, if it simply turns out to be some kind of a hunt, then we're obviously concerned."

Touzeau said that the university agrees.

"Having something in your criminal record is not necessarily a bad thing," she said. "If you're a receptionist, we won't be as interested in whether you have a good driving record."

Missouri joins a growing number of public and private universities that have broadened their criminal background checks to faculty hires.

- Staff writer George Diepenbrock contributed to this report.

Comments

logrithmic 6 years, 6 months ago

I'd like to see it applied to the president and congress.... LOL

0

Godot 6 years, 6 months ago

But, Sigmund, the business community is doing this, rigorously, for all new hires. If the Universities started doing this, where would all those who were rejected by corporate America find work?

0

sourpuss 6 years, 6 months ago

Let's all get our criminal records tattooed on our bellies, then an employer can do a "belly check" right then and there. I mean, it is really important that if you make a mistake when you were very young that you keep being punished for that mistake as long as you live, because good people don't make mistakes and good people don't have bad judgment or manipulative friends. And once someone has been bad, there is no way they can ever truly be good or reformed again.

Belly tattoos.

0

Sigmund 6 years, 6 months ago

I think once an organization decides to use these kinds of tools, drug and criminal background tests, for screening employees, they should be applied to ALL potential employees including top management. This should also apply to any ongoing drug and criminal background checks as a condition to continued employment. If management is going to subject their employees to this kind of scrutiny, they need to lead the way by submitting to the same requirements.

0

Steve Jacob 6 years, 6 months ago

"KU asks for a voluntary disclosure of past convictions on applications"

Is that in the last 7 years? I remember George Bush, when asked about his DUI arrest, why he did not say anything about it, and he said on Texas state applications, they asked if convicted in the last seven years, so he could say no.

But seriously, how many of them had pot arrest in the 60's. Or protest arrest. Plus they are lucky because they had to run over somebody to get a DUI back then, except for W. To be fair, if the janitors have to have a check, why not everyone else?

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.