Archive for Monday, September 24, 2007
KU student in demand after furry find
September 24, 2007
Advertisement
Bat, man
Jacob Esselstyn describes the new species of bat he discovered. Enlarge video
Jake Esselstyn's phone rings a lot these days, thanks to a new species of bat he discovered in the Philippines.
"I guess I'm getting my 15 minutes of fame," the 33-year-old Kansas University graduate student said with a chuckle recently as he sat in his Dyche Hall office.
Esselstyn's discovery has been named the "flying fox bat" because its head looks like that of, well, a tiny fox. It is a type of fruit bat, he said. It has orange fur and white stripes on the front of its head.
Esselstyn found the bat in 2006 during a research trip on the Philippines' Mindoro island. He was with a Filipino scientist, looking for bats and shrews. Shrews are 2- or 3-inch long mammals with pointy snouts.
But the fox bat that became trapped in a net garnered the most attention. Esselstyn spent the past year studying the bat specimen and comparing it to others before going public about the discovery. He wrote an article about it, which recently appeared in the "Journal of Mammalogy." The Filipino government also made a public announcement about the bat, and there were stories in that country's newspapers.
In the United States, other media also have contacted Esselstyn. A short story appeared in the online "National Geographic News." Next week, Time magazine's "Time for Kids" plans to do an interview, he said.
The publicity surprised Esselstyn, an Oregon native who is working on his doctorate in biology. New species of animals, usually small lizards and frogs, are discovered frequently and get little mainstream media publicity, he said.
"I think this one has gotten so much press because it is so good looking," Esselstyn said. "Most new specimens of mammals are small, brown-looking things that don't attract much attention."
A total of four specimens of the bat were eventually obtained and are kept in a preservative at KU. Two of the specimens will be returned to the Philippines and go to the National Museum in Manila, Esselstyn said.
Esselstyn returned to Mindoro earlier this year but did not find any more of the fox bats. He thinks there are more of them and there could be some in other areas of Asia.
While the fox bat wasn't known to the scientific world, Mindoro residents had seen them. One local guide described the unusual bat to Esselstyn. Esselstyn said he remained skeptical until he saw the bat in the net, which had been set up to catch specimens.
"He was very close on the description," Esselstyn said of the guide. "As soon as we saw it, we knew it was what he was talking about."
More like this
- New mouse a rare find on Cyprus October 13, 2006
- Jacob Esselstyn describes the new species of bat he discovered. September 22, 2007
- KU collection to get new home October 4, 2005
- Nation Briefs April 10, 2002
- Nation Briefs April 10, 2002
Top ads RSS
- COLLISION REPAIR TECHS Quality oriented techs needed for busy collision ...
- LPN Baldwin Healthcare is currently accepting applications for a full ...
- DERMATOLOGY Nurse Seeking LPN/MA for dermatology practice in Lawrence. Part-time ...
- Operator Wanted Experienced Operator wanted to assist in the running ...
- KU Office of Institutional Research & Planning
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Blog: Being A Stripper: 10 Things I'Ve Learned So Far November 10, 2009 · 81 comments
- Parental duties November 10, 2009 · 66 comments
- Blog: Dillons, Hyvee, And Checkers — I'Ve Shopped And Compared. See The Results. November 8, 2009 · 210 comments
- On the street: Did you watch 'Sesame Street' when you were a child? November 10, 2009 · 61 comments
- Thanks to Moore November 10, 2009 · 66 comments
- Attorney for man who says he shot George Tiller won't present 'necessity' defense November 10, 2009 · 25 comments
- Blog: Song Titles And Lyrics: Nonsensical Non Word Songs! November 9, 2009 · 113 comments
- <strong>FINAL:</strong> KU gives highlight-reel performance in 103-45 exhibition win over Pitt. State November 10, 2009 · 7 comments
- Roeder confesses to shooting abortion doctor November 9, 2009 · 63 comments
- Blog: Who Is To Blame For Inaction On Climate Change? November 9, 2009 · 28 comments
- Season's greetings: Photographer’s book explores Kansas nature November 10, 2009
- 'White Owl' held in jail in connection with protective order case November 9, 2009
- Business development taking shape November 10, 2009
- First blast on section of Kansas Turnpike river bridge scheduled for early Sunday afternoon November 10, 2009
- Food Inc. documentary to be shown at KU November 10, 2009
- Cats are independent but trainable November 10, 2009
- KU fraternity members to collect food, money this weekend at Clinton Parkway Hy-Vee November 10, 2009
- New, legal, drug has law enforcement concerned — and it's already on a Lawrence store's shelves November 4, 2009
- Douglas County's Medical Reserve Corps shows its worth during H1N1 pandemic November 10, 2009
- <strong>FINAL:</strong> KU gives highlight-reel performance in 103-45 exhibition win over Pitt. State November 10, 2009




24 September 2007
at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
aquakej (Anonymous) says…
uh, yeah. That kind of sucks that they killed the first four they found. Given that they hadn't been “discovered” yet, it's pretty fair to assume that they are highly endangered. Way to to.
24 September 2007
at 8:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
aquakej (Anonymous) says…
I meant, uh, way to go.
24 September 2007
at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
aeroscout17 (Anonymous) says…
Reminds me of the Audubon Society, the organization that is for preservation/protection of birds. It is named after the famous artist (ornithologist?) John James Audubon. Did a great job of painting pictures of birds, but killed them first so that he could have an immobile subject. Can we have it both ways?
24 September 2007
at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
75x55 (Anonymous) says…
That's the nature of systematic collections, folks.
24 September 2007
at 11:54 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
gypsy10 (Anonymous) says…
Bright lights, kill the beautiful little creatures all in the name of science, go figure! Pathetic.
24 September 2007
at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OldEnuf2BYurDad (Anonymous) says…
I'd have called it the 'Possum Bat.
24 September 2007
at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
Oh, sure, they call 'em “fox” bats, but we know better… that's a coyote bat if ever I saw one. You really want those things dive bombing the kiddie pool?
24 September 2007
at 12:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
tangential_reasoners_anonymous (Anonymous) says…
The article refers to the “flying fox bat”-as opposed to the “ambulating” fox bat. (Talk about yer little ankle biters….)
24 September 2007
at 1:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Pywacket (Anonymous) says…
OldEnuf and tangential… You're both wrong! That's a badger bat if I ever saw one. That explains why they're all dead. The dedicated scientists and environmentalists took one look at them and declared, “Badger bats? Badger bats? We don't need no stinkin' badger bats!”
24 September 2007
at 1:18 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Fatty_McButterpants (Anonymous) says…
How about “Bat-ter off not killed and put in preservative” bat?
24 September 2007
at 3:05 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Confrontation (Anonymous) says…
Fatty, don't be such a bat-tle-axe!
24 September 2007
at 4:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Centrist (Anonymous) says…
Umm … the “flying fox” already existed: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mariana_…
Perhaps a better choice of name?
24 September 2007
at 5:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jhawk_pirate (Anonymous) says…
i dont think you can transport live animals into the US … i'm pretty sure they managed to keep them alive back in the Philippines. so stop acting like 'animal activists' when u don't know anything about scientific work.
24 September 2007
at 7:40 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Tychoman (Anonymous) says…
That bat in the top picture looks thrilled…
25 September 2007
at 2:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Dominic_Sova (Anonymous) says…
IF there's four of them to kill, there's certainly a lot more than that.
The odds of two people catching the last four of any living creature make it highly improbable. I'm sure the bats are in much more danger from pollution, etc., than scientists.
Thanks.
Dominic.