Archive for Monday, November 26, 2007
Ratepayer advocates say Sebelius is influencing Westar decision
November 26, 2007
Advertisement
A consumer advocacy agency wants to know if Gov. Kathleen Sebelius compromised the rights of ratepayers in Westar Energy Inc.'s request for an increase.
The Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board has asked utility regulators to recuse themselves from considering Westar's proposed rate increase after seeing an internal Westar e-mail that says Sebelius said utilities would be "fully compensated" for trying to increase wind energy.
"We want to ensure that we have impartial judges," said David Springe, consumer counsel for CURB.
Sebelius' office Monday denied the governor sought to influence the rate decision on Westar.
"The implication by CURB is off base," said Sebelius' spokeswoman Nicole Corcoran.
Westar, the largest electric utility in Kansas, has requested a rate increase to produce approximately 300 megawatts of wind energy. Under the plan, Westar's residential customers would see a $2 to $2.50 per month increase in their electric bills.
The issue is on a fast-track timetable before the three-member Kansas Corporation Commission. All commissioners have been appointed by Sebelius.
One of them -- Joseph Harkins, a former energy advisor to Sebelius -- has already recused himself from the case, saying he wanted to avoid "even the slightest appearance of impropriety."
CURB has requested the other two commissioners -- Mike Moffet and Tom Wright -- also abstain from making decisions in the rate hike request.
In researching the case, CURB found an e-mail written Dec. 21, 2006 by then Westar chief executive officer James Haines.
In the e-mail from Haines to other Westar executives, Haines tells of a meeting several days earlier between utility chiefs and Sebelius and Lt. Gov. Mark Parkinson.
Haines said that Sebelius told them about her policy initiative to increase renewable energy in Kansas, and she acknowledged that ratemaking before the KCC had emphasized lowest-cost ways to provide power.
"She indicated that the policy initiative will address this historical practice and will change it so that companies that commit to wind will be fully compensated," Haines wrote.
CURB says if Sebelius gave any instructions or commitments to any of the commissioners that could affect the case's outcome "the due process rights of our clients have been compromised."
CURB has testified that Westar should not get as much of an increase as it has asked for.
And it says if Moffet and Wright don't recuse themselves from the case, then they should affirm that they have not been influenced in the matter.
Neither Wright nor Moffet have filed their responses to CURB's request, but are expected to do so soon.
Sebelius spokeswoman Corcoran said the governor has never advised KCC members how they should set rates.
But she added that at that meeting with utility executives, Sebelius and Parkinson "also acknowledged that electric utilities need to be compensated for costs of energy they develop."
More like this
- Consumer group: Gov. may have compromised rate increase request November 27, 2007
- Commissioners stay on Westar rate case 4 comments / November 30, 2007
- Regulators affirm independence from Sebelius on energy policy 2 comments / December 1, 2007
- Changes may blow out Westar's wind proposal 47 comments / December 3, 2007
- Westar's wind plan deemed 'prudent' 8 comments / December 28, 2007
Top ads RSS
- Utilization Review Specialist Elizabeth Layton Center has part-time opening for ...
- Customer Service/ Manager Trainees!! $450/wk. Must be able to start ...
- Googols of Learning Child Development Center is now hiring for ...
- Grant Monitor Higuchi Biosciences Center, KU Duties include coordination of ...
- FUNERAL PLANNING ADVISORS An excellent career opportunity for men and ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Commissioner wants street work to be done by local unemployed people, but federal regulations disagree November 9, 2009 · 28 comments
- Blog: Song Titles And Lyrics: Nonsensical Non Word Songs! November 9, 2009 · 103 comments
- Parental duties November 10, 2009 · 47 comments
- Blog: Being A Stripper: 10 Things I'Ve Learned So Far November 10, 2009 · 56 comments
- Blog: I Am Batman. November 10, 2009 · 23 comments
- On the street: Did you watch 'Sesame Street' when you were a child? November 10, 2009 · 44 comments
- Thanks to Moore November 10, 2009 · 52 comments
- Education commission challenges elected leaders to enhance funding for Kansas schools November 9, 2009 · 2 comments
- Blog: Who Is To Blame For Inaction On Climate Change? November 9, 2009 · 20 comments
- Blog: Dillons, Hyvee, And Checkers — I'Ve Shopped And Compared. See The Results. November 8, 2009 · 202 comments
- 'White Owl' held in jail in connection with protective order case November 9, 2009
- Business development taking shape November 10, 2009
- Season's greetings: Photographer’s book explores Kansas nature November 10, 2009
- Cats are independent but trainable November 10, 2009
- Lecompton man still in serious condition after motorcycle accident November 9, 2009
- Bioscience Authority puts its money on KU November 10, 2009
- New, legal, drug has law enforcement concerned — and it's already on a Lawrence store's shelves November 4, 2009
- Gary Bedore’s KU Basketball Notebook November 10, 2009
- Unemployed Kansans eligible for additional benefits November 10, 2009
- Five downtown Lawrence businesses report burglaries over the weekend November 9, 2009
26 November 2007
at 1:06 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
justthefacts (Anonymous) says…
Uh, just one question LJW reporters. If CURB gets it way and ALL 3 of the KCC Commissioners recuse themselves from making a rate decision on a rate case before them, just exactly HOW would a hearing on that issue be possible to conduct??? There are no “back up” KCC Commissioners!! And no laws addressing what happens if no KCC commissioner can hear a rate case. So someone has to make the decision. Who does CURB want it to be - besides them I mean??
How often does CURB think the Governor cares about and has an opinion on a rate case's outcome? How about every time!!!!!!! This is just politics - and whining - as usual. IMO.
26 November 2007
at 2:29 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
johngalt (Anonymous) says…
So the Gov, in addition to wanting increased taxes, wants our utilitiy rates to increase?
26 November 2007
at 2:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ASBESTOS (Anonymous) says…
Under the Kansas Administrative Procedures Act, it goes to the Civil Service Board or the District Court.
26 November 2007
at 4:38 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
toefungus (Anonymous) says…
Our governor hates Kansas and manipulates the system behind the scenes. Remember my comment on Hack's free pass. The order coming from the gov to the AG to leave Hack alone now seems a little more plausable.
26 November 2007
at 4:45 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
LogicMan (Anonymous) says…
“Our governor hates Kansas”
I don't believe that. But she does seem to be angling for a top D.C. job in the next administration.
27 November 2007
at 10:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
beobachter (Anonymous) says…
I'm sure the governor wishes she had the power the conservatives give her credit for.