Sunflower Electric, lawmakers go on offensive over coal plants

Governor backs denial of permits

? The head of Sunflower Electric Power Corp. called on Gov. Kathleen Sebelius to reverse her administration’s denial of two coal-fired plants – and apologize.

The letter from Earl Watkins, president and chief executive of Sunflower Electric, was in response to remarks made by Sebelius last week and an Oct. 18 denial by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment of the proposed power plants near Holcomb.

“Governor, I ask you to apologize for your challenge of our moral fiber and to reverse your decision,” Watkins said.

KDHE Secretary Roderick Bremby denied the permits, citing concerns about the health effects of coal-produced carbon dioxide emissions.

Several days later, Sebelius wrote in an “open letter” that she supported the decision for economical and environmental reasons.

She said denial of the permits would “uphold our moral obligation to be good stewards of this beautiful land.”

Watkins said that the proposed plants would have been among the cleanest coal-fired plants in the nation, and that Sunflower had worked aggressively to address environmental concerns.

He said it was unfair for Sebelius “to play the ‘moral’ card” because she promotes wind energy, which some see as harmful to landscapes, birds and habitats.

In response to Watkins’ letter, Sebelius’ office said she would review it “carefully” but it won’t affect her support of Bremby’s order.

In addition, Sebelius spokeswoman Nicole Corcoran said, “The moral obligation she has referenced is her own moral obligation to protect the people and environment of our state.”

Senate President Steve Morris, R-Hugoton, and House Speaker Melvin Neufeld, R-Ingalls, also have weighed in with an “open letter” critical of the Sebelius administration’s decision on the coal plants.

The two legislators said Sunflower’s proposal met all environmental standards and noted that carbon dioxide emissions are unregulated on the state and federal level.

“The governor’s public position and her administration’s decision are misleading and misguided,” they said.