Archive for Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Bill requiring people to show proof of citizenship before receiving benefits falters

March 27, 2007


Topeka - A bill that supporters said would prohibit illegal immigrants from getting state benefits, including in-state tuition, was dealt a major setback Tuesday.

On a 65-56 vote, the House sent House Bill 2367 back to the House Judiciary Committee, which probably will take no action on the legislation, according to the committee chairman.

"The motion was intended to kill the bill," said Judiciary Chairman Rep. Mike O'Neal, R-Hutchinson.

The bill's author, Rep. Lance Kinzer, R-Olathe, said it was unlikely his bill would get new life during the 2007 legislative session.

But, he added, "Nothing is over until the last gavel bangs."

There are no more Judiciary Committee meetings scheduled as the Legislature moves toward its first adjournment on April 3. At this point, most legislative action is before the full House and Senate and in House-Senate conference committees.

Kinzer's measure would have required people to show proof of citizenship before receiving benefits, such as social services.

It also would have invalidated a 2004 state law that allows some illegal immigrants to pay the same lower tuition rates as legal Kansans at state universities, community colleges and vocational schools. The student must have lived in Kansas at least three years and seek or promise to seek legal status. Last fall, 169 students took advantage of the provision.

Kinzer said the law creates an incentive for immigrants to come to Kansas illegally.

But several lawmakers said the bill's requirement to show proof of citizenship would be an undue burden on all other students.

"This is a case where the cure is worse than the disease," said Rep. Tom Moxley, R-Council Grove.

Others feared the requirement to prove citizenship would produce logjams for health care and other services.

Rep. Mark Treaster, D-Pretty Prairie, pointed to a federal requirement to prove citizenship for Medicaid that has resulted in thousands of eligible Kansans waiting for assistance as documents are verified.

"This bill will be punitive to our citizens," Treaster said.

He made the motion to refer the legislation to the Judiciary Committee for further study. Last week, the House Federal and State Affairs Committee recommended approval of the bill.

Earlier, Rep. Tom Holland, D-Baldwin City, successfully amended the bill to increase penalties against employers who knowingly hire illegal immigrants. Holland has long argued that increased sanctions against employers would stem the flow of illegal immigrants.


Centrist 10 years, 12 months ago

Oh no, we can't have people proving who they are or anything. It's too punitive.

Then why do we have I.D at all?

And why is our SSN used more often than anything else we have?

trinity 10 years, 12 months ago

agree, centrist...and hey, is that whole flap about "national id's" still in the kettle? or has that pretty much gone away? i've not heard anything of it for quite some time and really don't know.

now just how hypocritical would that be? WE all have to get some sort of national id(above&beyond the overused social security #s), and illegals don't have to show a blamed thing to receive benefits?? aggghh my brain hurts.

Ceallach 10 years, 12 months ago

Things must have really changed during the decades since my children were first enrolled in Lawrence schools (yes, that old:) I had to provide a birth certificate as well as their medical records for them to go to Kindergarten! Is this no longer the case? Or are we dealing with children who are citizens and parents who are illegal? I don't understand how some people think using all of our resources for illegal immigrants is a good thing. It has nearly wrecked California and Texas. Shouldn't we learn from their mistakes?

opinion 10 years, 12 months ago


Do you have a link to roll calls for KS?


Patty Buchholz 10 years, 12 months ago

Once again, lawmakers show they are full of hot air. They never intended to pass this bill. I remind you, the key word is 'illegal' and one would think that 'lawmakers' would not tolerate 'illegal'. Boy, was I wrong! Sad, that our legislators don't care why we 'legal citizens' elected them.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.