Archive for Wednesday, March 7, 2007
House gets KU Hospital proposal
Bill to sell property, use proceeds for university repairs, originated in Senate
March 7, 2007
Advertisement
A proposal to sell Kansas University Hospital that emerged last week in the Senate got a foothold in the House on Tuesday.
Under the proposal by state Sen. Chris Steineger, D-Kansas City, the state would sell KU Hospital and use the proceeds to pay for repairs at regents universities and help the state pension system.
Steineger said independent analyses showed that the hospital in Kansas City, Kan., could be sold for at least $800 million.
"As a Legislature, we have a reciprocal responsibility to our state employees, our teachers, our local elected officials and the students of Kansas to fix their broken retirement system and to refurbish their rundown buildings," Steineger said.
Lawmakers face an estimated $660 million in deferred maintenance and repairs at the six regents universities. Legislative leaders say they believe a $100 million-per-year increase for maintenance would eventually resolve the backlog of projects.
The Kansas Public Employees Retirement System has a $5.1 billion gap between the value of its assets and its future pension obligations.
State Rep. Lee Tafanelli, R-Ozawkie, introduced a companion bill to Steineger's in the House Appropriations Committee.
As vice chairman of the committee, Tafanelli said he brought the bill up at Steineger's request.
Tafanelli said he didn't support the measure at this point, but looked forward to learning more about it.
KU officials say selling the hospital would kill KU's attempts to be designated as a national cancer center.
"What happens is the investment you expect an academic hospital to make in its medical school and its programs goes instead to the shareholders of the company," said Barbara Atkinson, executive vice chancellor of the KU Medical Center.
Steineger has said perhaps the hospital could be sold to a nonprofit entity, but Atkinson said that was doubtful.
Doctors also have weighed in against any potential sale, saying a private hospital would be less likely to support the current level of charity care, teaching and research at KU Hospital.
Top ads RSS
- CSR’s Needed Work Local !!Excellent Opportunity!! Local company needs CSR’s ...
- Correct Care Solutions
- Apartment Turnover help needed Looking for cleaners & painters. July ...
- WANTED General and Assistant Managers Jimmy John’s gourmet sub shop ...
- LEGAL SECRETARY PART TIME Litigation firm needs experienced person, up ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Sidewalk step July 9, 2009 · 21 comments
- Police surround Jayhawk Motel, apprehend juvenile robbery suspect July 9, 2009 · 19 comments
- Secular freedom July 9, 2009 · 112 comments
- Budget crisis felt deeply at KU July 9, 2009 · 49 comments
- Sex offender sentenced to two years of probation following no-contest plea July 9, 2009 · 9 comments
- Lawrence police release details on three recent sex crimes July 9, 2009 · 11 comments
- State slows down introducing new license plates July 9, 2009 · 12 comments
- Lawrence police and Douglas County Sheriff's officers take a man into custody at the Jayhawk Motel, July 9, 2009 · 1 comment
- Donor ready to write Lawrence schools a check for new locker rooms at Free State — but there's a catch July 9, 2009 · 9 comments
- U.S., other wealthy nations vow global warming cuts July 9, 2009 · 3 comments
- Round Corner Drug, Cheese Shoppe closes July 8, 2009
- More than 2,750 turn out for community workout July 8, 2009
- Lawrence Arts Center director announces resignation July 8, 2009
- North Lawrence intersection poised for reconstruction July 8, 2009
- Make a financial master list for your will July 9, 2009
- Budget crisis felt deeply at KU July 9, 2009
- Twisted sisters July 9, 2009
- Police surround Jayhawk Motel, apprehend juvenile robbery suspect July 9, 2009
- Oread hotel on schedule for debut in February July 6, 2009
- Rest for the weary July 9, 2009
7 March 2007
at 7:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
leftylucky (Anonymous) says…
Why don't they try selling the capitol building. The hospital does provide a service to the people of Kansas, and surrounding states. There was quite a bit of money set aside to repair the capitol building. The hospital has provided a greater service than the state legislature.
7 March 2007
at 8:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ed (Anonymous) says…
Are there any top medical centers in the US that work with privately owned hospitals? If so, how has the medical center at these hospitals performed? Answering this question will help us answer questions about KU Hospital.
7 March 2007
at 8:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
oldgoof (Anonymous) says…
Ed: since the only topic you have ever posted on is this KU Hospital issue, presumably you are involved, and have opinions and knowledge. So don't be coy and tell us your point.
7 March 2007
at 9:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
This is silly.
An $800 Million sale will fix a $660 Million backlog and assist with $5.1 Billion shortcoming in KPERS?
Robbing Peter to pay Paul and Paul will still be owed a tremendous amount of money.
Regardless of whether you think KU Hospital should be sold, the reasoning of this proposed solution is highly flawed.
7 March 2007
at 10:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
livingstone (Anonymous) says…
One big question, selling KU hospital doesn't solve the problem. The problem is fund mis-management, which inflitrates through the government.
7 March 2007
at 12:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
monkfellow (Anonymous) says…
to answer the questions about public-private partnerships, the University of Minnesota Hospital System works hand-in-glove with Fairview, in fact,Fairview runs the operations and the U handles the academic side.
8 March 2007
at 9:42 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
ed (Anonymous) says…
Old Goof-
You are pretty sharp. The reason I have gotten into this entire issue is because my wife works at KU Hospital. She is just a resident, and we'll probably be moving to another city for her fellowship, so this whole thing really won't affect her in the long term anyway. I have no other affiliation with KUMC or KU Hospital, or the medical world in general. So I am indirectly affiliated, but really with nothing to gain. I just can't stand to let the wrong things happen (in my personal opinion).
The reason why I asked whether a private hospital and a public university could work together is because I didn't know the answer to the question. No alterior motives.
I think that KUMC should be allowed to affiliate with St. Luke's. You can see from my posts why I believe this is the case. Read the bottom of this link for some facts:
http://www2.ljworld.com/news/2007/mar…