Revelations of shoddy facilities and bureaucratic nightmares at Walter Reed Army Medical Center have tarnished the reputation of the renowned military hospital. But they may also have given the 98-year-old facility a second life.

The furor surrounding the treatment of wounded soldiers has prompted some lawmakers, veterans and Army officials to ask: Why is the Defense Department closing Walter Reed – where more than 6,000 soldiers injured in Iraq and Afghanistan have been treated since 2002 – in the middle of a war with mounting casualties?

Congress approved and President Bush signed into law the recommendation of the federal Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Commission in 2005 that Walter Reed be closed and consolidated with the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda, Md., where a $2 billion expansion is being planned.

The debate has been fueled by testimony from Army officials that the problems in outpatient care have been exacerbated, in part, by the planned closure in 2011. Commanders said this has created “instability” at the hospital and made it difficult to keep a good work force, which is two-thirds civilian.

“The BRAC pressure is clear,” agreed Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C. “What it does is send the signal to everybody: Go look for another job because we think it’s going to close down.” Norton said she will introduce legislation seeking to repeal the planned closure of Walter Reed.