Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, March 6, 2007

Candidates focus on teacher retention

March 6, 2007

Advertisement

Lawrence voters get their first chance to hear from candidates running in the general elections

A candidate forum tonight at the library drew a standing room only crowd as Lawrence voters got their first chance to hear from the City Commission and School Board candidates running in the general election. Enlarge video

How do you keep teachers in Lawrence?

Voters got a chance to hear Monday night how the eight school board candidates think Lawrence should compete for teachers in coming years.

Some said making salaries competitive was the answer.

But others offered a number of nonsalary ideas, including lowering class sizes and improving facilities, to keep teachers from looking for greener pastures.

The candidates, who are vying for four seats on the board in the April 3 election, spoke at a forum sponsored by the Voter Education Coalition at Lawrence Public Library. About 50 people attended.

Victor Sisk, a retired state schools activities administrator and former Lawrence High School music teacher, said there's a drain on teachers in Lawrence because of a lack of competitive salaries for experienced educators.

"There is a need to increase teacher longevity with competitive salaries and a continued, but improved, retirement benefit package," Sisk wrote in a statement read by Stan Roth, a retired teacher. Roth explained Sisk could not attend because he was on a trip.

Robert Rauktis, a retired physician, said the best way to retain teachers in Lawrence is to stress the community's assets.

"I just don't think you can get in an arms race, salarywise, with Johnson County," Rauktis said.

Rauktis said he would emphasize improving the salaries of midcareer teachers.

"I'd hate to say let some of the younger people flounder, but they're good at that," said Rauktis.

Michael Pomes, an environmental scientist for the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, said the loss of teachers has to be stopped.

Pomes said he would work to ensure more funding for salaries.

He also said he was concerned about how much teachers have to pay in out-of-pocket costs to provide classroom supplies for their students.

"More must be done for teachers on the lower end of the pay scale," Pomes said.

Scott Morgan, a local publisher who served on the school board from 1999 through 2003, said salaries play a big role in retaining teachers.

"But it's only part of the solution to recruiting and retaining the teachers we want and we need," Morgan said.

He said the state determines much of the revenue the district has.

"You've got to focus on things other than just money," Morgan said. "You've got to focus on the benefits, the facilities and the class size."

Incumbent Rich Minder said he was committed to increasing teacher salaries.

But Minder also said he supports looking at a wider range of issues, such as providing more planning time for elementary teachers.

"There are issues of transforming our retirement system into a sustainable retirement system," Minder said.

Marlene Merrill, a retired Lawrence schools administrator who now works for the Kansas City, Kan., school district, cited a need to increase salaries for teachers, paraeducators and school secretarial staff.

Merrill said that compared with the Kansas City school district, "Lawrence is greatly underfunded."

Merrill also called for reducing class size and providing more teaching resources in the classroom.

The district also needs to start the recruitment process earlier, she said.

Michael Machell, a human resources manager, said the district has a lot to offer and needs to market the community to teachers.

Machell said the district needs to look at opportunities for career growth for teachers.

He also suggested comparing salaries with nearby districts and doing exit interviews with teachers who are leaving to find out why.

"It may not be totally salary-related," he said. The district should also follow up on teachers who turned down jobs to see what they were offered elsewhere.

Mary Loveland, who served for 16 years on the school board until being voted off in 2003, said the board always analyzes the budget each year to give teachers the highest salaries possible.

"Of course, it isn't all about salaries," Loveland said.

The benefit package, mentoring programs and professional development also are important, she said

Loveland agreed that it would be important to have exit interviews on why teachers leave the district.

Comments

commuter 7 years, 1 month ago

pelliott- We ahve raised teacher salaries for the last three years. When i started in public accounting 10 years in a small firm, i made less that the starting techers made in lawrence and i had to work MORE than they did.

0

pelliott 7 years, 1 month ago

It is time we raised teacher salaries. Everytime we have been asked to build or repair, they would say we wish we could raise teachers salaries but the building repairs are emmergency. Good teachers are worth a lot to me. Raise the teachers salaries and lower the number of kids in each class. PLEASE. My daughter is off to college now, I didn't like all her teachers but I found most of them heros.

0

Agnostick 7 years, 1 month ago

COMING UP NEXT...

More cantankerous catterwalling from Conservative Republican extremists about how the NEA teachers union is singlehandedly responsible for each and every problem facing teachers (both good and bad) and public schools (both good and--wait, there aren't any good public schools, they're ALL bad).

The NEA is also singlehandedly responsible for the violence and bad morals found in today's worst schoolchildren.

Parents are saints, all of them. Even the ones that completely ignore their children are saints, because it's all the NEA's fault!

All that and more... coming up on your next Conservative Republican Extremist's Education Diatribe (CREED), right here on your local internet forum!

Agnostick agnostick@excite.com

0

Ray Parker 7 years, 1 month ago

No child left behind? Most public school children are being left behind, not for lack of funding, but because of fraud and corruption in lazy public school administration and staff. The excess taxpayer expenditures that legislators told you had to be thrown at school boards to improve student performance was instead diverted to unjustified pay raises, flawed teaching methods, worthless curricula, and status symbol projects like sports stadiums and administration buildings (usually named after administrators on the taxpayer payroll). But at least the students know how to put condoms on cucumbers, how to find the nearest abortion mill, and how to endorse sodomy when (if) they graduate. And it appears that the downtrodden races are staying downtrodden in the public schools. Since 1990, students lacking basic reading skills rose from 20% to 27%. High school seniors proficient in reading went from 40% to 35%. 16% of black and 20% of Hispanic students are proficient in reading. Among high school seniors, 29% of whites, 10% of Hispanics and 6% of blacks are proficient in math. This does not factor in 25% of whites and 50% of blacks and Hispanics who drop out by senior year. Parents must be made to understand that this appalling situation cannot be fixed or improved by throwing more tax money at corrupt, fraudulent school boards and faculties. That idea has led to the terrible 40-year decline in America's public education system, with no end in sight without radical, major surgery in federal and state governments.

0

jayneway 7 years, 1 month ago

Oh come on... no one is going to comment on letting young teachers flounder because they are good at it???

0

hawkperchedatriverfront 7 years, 1 month ago

The "hawk' has a great way of dispensing water retention. It will be in the Kaw river and go right to the water plant to supply the tainted water being drunk at city hall.

0

minko224 7 years, 1 month ago

Hmmm teacher retention. Is that anything like water retention?

0

hawkperchedatriverfront 7 years, 1 month ago

And how do these candidates expect to pay for retention? The last time the "hawk" had retention done of the beak, the bird dentist charged money. Retention equals money!

0

caveatguy 7 years, 1 month ago

Prioress has a good point. Most institutional exit interviews are not arms-length, and do not produce good information.

0

prioress 7 years, 1 month ago

Salary is important, but the #1 reason people stay in a school is the leadership and the vision of the collective staff. Exit interviews can be interesting, but are most useful if they are conducted by an outside agency and "sanitized" versions are sent to the board and administration. Telling the principal, even on the way out the door, the truth, is not very likely.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.