Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, June 23, 2007

Public tired of partisan standoff

June 23, 2007

Advertisement

New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg was never really a Republican; neither was he really a Democrat, the political party he previously left. From DINO (Democrat in name only), he became a RINO (Republican in name only) and now I guess one might call him, what, an UNO (unaffiliated in name only)?

Actually, Bloomberg is to party affiliation what some New Yorkers are to their baseball teams - when they're winning, they're all for them, but lose and it's the Bronx cheer.

Still, in announcing his new unaffiliated status, Bloomberg said something that caught my attention: "Any successful elected executive knows that real results are more important than partisan battles, and that good ideas should take precedence over rigid adherence to any particular ideology." Not that Bloomberg was ever known for a rigid adherence to anything besides his money (he is a billionaire, in case you hadn't heard), but still he may be onto something.

California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has spoken of a new era of "post partisanship" in describing his approach to governing America's largest state. He and Bloomberg are featured on the cover of this week's Time magazine. The headline is "Who Needs Washington?" Not them.

Six months into the Democratic dominance of Congress, polls show the public disapproves of the job Democrats are doing. In fact, the Democrats' approval ratings are lower than those of President Bush.

The public is increasingly angry and frustrated with the extreme partisanship that passes for governing in Washington. Neither party seems to be willing to give the other a break. Neither appears ready to credit the other with any good ideas. Both indulge in finger pointing and focus on destroying the other. A growing number of us say it doesn't matter which party is in charge, because both appear to act like the party of government. Republicans and Democrats seem to care more about gaining and maintaining power and position and seeing what they can get out of their tenure as "public servants" than they do about actually serving the public.

Since his re-election as an independent, Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman has spoken and acted like a liberated man. In this, he sounds like Michael Bloomberg.

It isn't that ideology counts for nothing. It does. But no one gets his or her way all the time and with so many challenges confronting us - inside and especially outside the country - people are beginning to question the old model of partisan bickering and the pursuit of power for its own sake. Did the Republicans learn nothing from their defeat at the polls last November? Aren't the Democrats already repeating their mistakes? Can't they see that the public is on to their game and is sick of it?

Might the 2008 election be a different kind of election than what we have seen in the recent past and are seeing presently? Could a couple of candidates emerge who actually seek consensus on some critical issues and who tell us it is more important to destroy our terrorist enemies than to treat the other as an enemy and seek to destroy a fellow American? Would a public that seems so turned off to the political scorched earth tactics of both parties pay attention to candidates who put the country and what's really best for America ahead of their own careers and personal objectives?

I could be wrong (or naive) - and it wouldn't be the first time - but a candidate, or candidates, who run on a consensus or common ground theme might attract more attention than Republican and Democratic candidates who indulge their lower natures by claiming the "other side" is out to destroy the country and that electing the other person means Armageddon for us all.

The first "affiliation" of all Americans should be to America and its interests, not to political parties that increasingly seem out of touch with that objective. Bloomberg and Schwarzenegger (and Lieberman) may be onto something. It will be interesting to see how quickly others follow.

- Cal Thomas is a columnist for Tribune Media Services.

Comments

jonas 6 years, 9 months ago

Some folks can't seem to comprehend political moderation. Or not biting the party line hook and sinker.

0

greyheim 6 years, 9 months ago

No, he sounds like an idiot who just doesn't have the courage to go ahead and become a Republican

LOL! that's exactly what i've thought since he went independent, an uber-right repub more in line w/cheney - especially talking about iran. nice one bozo!

0

erod0723 6 years, 9 months ago

The past 3 years has set the stage for a legitimate third party. One that holds values that the majority of Americans have: stop destroying civil rights, provide better access to health care, provide solvency for social security, stop pre-emptive wars, and stop regulating morality.

0

i_tching 6 years, 9 months ago

Cal, who is as ideological, homophobic, belligerent, and partisan as they come, has little place on which to stand against the divisiveness he himself has encouraged on behalf of his own political preferences. That makes him a hypocrite... again.

0

just_another_bozo_on_this_bus 6 years, 9 months ago

"Since his re-election as an independent, Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman has spoken and acted like a liberated man. In this, he sounds like Michael Bloomberg."

No, he sounds like an idiot who just doesn't have the courage to go ahead and become a Republican.

0

Reality_Check 6 years, 9 months ago

If the Dems had any spine, they would say "enough!" They would call for a general strike, mass protests in Washington, and would hold up any legislation proposed by Republicans. They would show absolute unity (or Pelosi and Reid wouldn't give them any favors like choice committee chairs).

They would do this until the president and the Congressional minority followed the will of the people. The will of the people being, of course, the 65% who want us to reduce troop levels in Iraq now or within the next 12 months.

But they won't, because they are leaderless and spineless. They have managed, in just 6 mos., to squander the victory they had in November. Complete idiots.

0

Richard Heckler 6 years, 9 months ago

Many wanted the democrats to get us out of Iraq and rein in President Bush and his dictator mentality. Many of us know the republican party would not do that.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.