Archive for Monday, June 11, 2007
Foreclosure rate rising
More in Douglas County face losing their homes
June 11, 2007
Advertisement
Lawrence foreclosures
- Chat about foreclosures with John Becker. Submit a question
- At this rate, loans can be problematic (12-11-06)
- Property auctions too risky for most (12-11-06)
- Nonprofit offers to buy apartments (10-19-06)
- Low-income tenants face uncertain future (06-17-06)
- How far can you stretch $300,000? (06-04-06)
- Kansas foreclosures soar during year (01-04-06)
Robert Baker, education coordinator and counselor at Lawrence’s Housing and Credit Counseling Inc.
Robert Baker, education coordinator and counselor at Lawrence’s Housing and Credit Counseling Inc., talks about the reason for foreclosures and how it compares to years past. Enlarge video
Douglas County part of growing trend of foreclosures
It's a problem that has more and more local residents losing out on the American dream. Across the country foreclosures are on the rise and Douglas County is no exception. Enlarge video
A year ago, Sharon Roullins thought she was getting a chance to “start over.”
Finally approved for credit after three years of trying to buy a home in the Kansas City area, Roullins bought a three-bedroom home off Ward Avenue in East Lawrence last June.
For the first time, her children had their own rooms. Her two grade-school aged daughters liked their new school, and for single mom Roullins, the difference from Kansas City was “night and day.”
But Roullins was in for a nightmare when foreclosure proceedings began. Foreclosure occurs when a lender acts to repossess a property, usually when the homeowners get too far behind on their mortgage payments. This week, her home and four others are scheduled to be auctioned from the steps of the Douglas County Judicial and Law Enforcement Center, 111 E. 11th St. Roullins is one of the scores of Douglas County homeowners who have faced prospects of foreclosure this year.
“I really don’t know what to do,” Roullins said.
For Roullins, the downward spiral into foreclosure started with a trip to the emergency room last September. The visit was followed by a stay in the hospital that lasted into November, meaning there was little money to make the roughly $850 monthly mortgage payment.
“Basically, I got sick, went into the hospital and just fell behind,” Roullins said. “I missed one payment, and it just kind of snowballed.”
Now she gets daily phone calls from her mortgage company asking her about the payments and letters in the mail from businesses that say they want to help her.
But Roullins said her credit score is too low to qualify for any of the programs her mortgage company is offering, and she doesn’t trust out-of-town companies whose offers to help seem too good to be true.
She can’t find the real estate agent who sold her the house, and she doesn’t have the expertise to sell the house herself. Nor does she have the money to hire a lawyer.
So Thursday — the day of the sale — looms.
“Social services, church, family — we just don’t have those things to fall back on,” Roullins said.
Rash of foreclosures
The number of foreclosures has increased across the country, and Douglas County is no exception. In the first four months of 2007, the Douglas County Sheriff’s Office — which presides over the sale of homes that go into foreclosure — auctioned 39 homes. Comparatively, in the first four months of 2006, 28 Douglas County homes were auctioned at a sheriff’s sale. That’s a roughly 40 percent increase.
Many more homeowners, closer to 80, have received notices from the sheriff’s office that auction was pending unless they paid up on their mortgages.
Robert Baker, education coordinator and counselor at Lawrence’s Housing and Credit Counseling Inc., said a main reason for the increase in foreclosures is a change in the economy.
“The economic times aren’t quite as heady as they were in the go-go ’90s,” Baker said. “So, if people have any kind of economic setback — serious health problems, reduced income, that sort of thing — it is going to affect their ability to pay all their bills, and sometimes that affects their mortgage payment.”
Jonathan Becker, a bankruptcy and real estate attorney, lists four reasons for the rise in foreclosures: a lessening of credit standards, an increase in the kinds of loan options, a lack of home value appreciation, and a decrease of new homebuyers’ financial experience and education. Combined with any catastrophic event such as a job layoff, reduced income, illness or car accident — “you’ve got a recipe for foreclosure,” Becker said.
Although foreclosures in Douglas County have jumped, those who deal with the housing market in Lawrence say the community is not nearly as bad off as other parts of the country where waves of homeowners have defaulted on mortgages. For the first quarter of 2007, Kansas ranked 34th in the country for foreclosure rates, according to RealtyTrac, a Web site that compiles a database of foreclosures nationwide.
“We haven’t seen it here, but it doesn’t mean it isn’t coming,” said Doug Stephens, president of Stephens Real Estate Inc.
Baker, the housing and credit counselor, said higher housing prices in Douglas County have precluded many lenders from issuing riskier loans. Known as subprime loans, these lending options are made to borrowers with below-average credit scores and require little or no money upfront. And according to Baker, they are much more likely in a market where homes go for $50,000 or $80,000, not $200,000.
However, Becker said he is starting to see a lot more homeowners come into his office who are caught with loans that carry interest rates that are suddenly going up.
In the past few years, companies have offered low-interest, adjustable rate mortgages — but the low rate lasts only a few years. After that — for up to 28 years of a 30-year mortgage — the interest rate has a good chance of moving higher.
In the next few years, millions of these mortgages are expected to reset at higher interest rates, meaning homeowners will see a dramatic jump in their monthly mortgage payments.
“The 2-28 loan was becoming the welcome mat into the house. It’s now becoming the prison bars when the 28 (years) kicks in,” Becker said.
Staving off foreclosure
On Chastity Beerbower’s birthday, Jan. 18, her family’s house in Eudora was slated for sheriff’s sale. If the foreclosure had gone through, Beerbower wasn’t sure what her family — husband Jack, three boys and a girl — would have done.
“It’s either keep the house or become homeless,” Beerbower said. “Right now we don’t have the money to move, and no one wants to rent to someone who forecloses.”
The day before the sheriff’s auction, the sale was canceled. The family was able to save the house by filing for bankruptcy protection.
But it was a close call, Beerbower said. She and her husband, a self-employed carpenter, saw an ad for a lawyer who handled foreclosures. They hired him and were told to file for bankruptcy immediately.
Two years ago, the couple purchased a house on Acorn Street for $145,000. The five-bedroom home in a neighborhood with trees and nice yards was the first the Beerbowers had owned.
“We were going along just fine until (Jack’s) knee injury,” Beerbower said.
With her husband being out of work for injuries and then not being able to find work, the family got behind in paying their mortgage, Beerbower said. In a year and half, Jack had surgery on his knee and back. And in between the time off to recover from the surgeries, he found a sputtering construction market and few jobs.
A stay-at-home mom for 10 years, Chastity Beerbower went back to work at Eudora’s Kwik Shop, where she is an assistant manager. Jack traveled as far as Junction City and Louisiana for jobs, Beerbower said. As foreclosure was pending, they kept thinking the work would come.
“What our plan was: Get income, then pay up and hope for the best,” she said.
Eventually, the only choice was to file for bankruptcy, which stopped the foreclosure process.
Bankruptcy allowed the family to stay in the house, but Beerbower said they are still teetering on the edge of foreclosure if they can’t make their $1,500-a-month mortgage payment.
The family was willing to take the hit bankruptcy would leave on their financial record, Beerbower said, because it was better than losing the house. The main concern was making sure their children had a stable environment.
Filing for bankruptcy
When a foreclosure is pending, Becker said, filing for bankruptcy can be like nabbing home field advantage for the homeowner. In most cases, Becker said, the bankruptcy has to be filed before the court issues a judgment on the foreclosure and the notices start to go out that the house will be auctioned at a sheriff’s sale.
The bankruptcy will allow the homeowner to keep the house and set up a payment plan to the mortgage company through the court. The homeowner also still has to make the regular monthly payment to the mortgage company.
Bankruptcy does leave a mark and stays on credit reports for seven years.
However, Baker said that most credit scores are largely based on payment history from the past two years, the amount of debt and whether there is enough income to cover the loan.
Seeking options
Instead of traveling the bankruptcy route, many homeowners opt for dealing straight with their mortgage company in attempts to save the home.
Baker said the No. 1 mistake is to not act immediately.
“The longer you are delinquent and the more you owe, the less options you have. So start early,” Baker advised on seeking help, whether it comes from a certified mortgage default counselor, lender or even a relative who could loan the money.
Becker said many mortgage companies operate on a calendar that starts the foreclosure process rolling when payments are more than 59 days late. Letters are issued and attorneys contacted.
At that point, Becker said, the homeowner has to cover not only the missed payments but also the mortgage company’s attorney fees.
“Once you get to the 59 days, the alarms go off,” Becker said. “Automatically add on $800 to $1,000.”
Looking back, Beerbower said she recommends that those approaching foreclosure stay on top of the problem.
The effort can take hours, but most mortgage companies will work with borrowers who are seeking a remedy.
“They don’t want to repossess your house. If they foreclose on your house, they have to market it to sell it,” Baker said.



11 June 2007 at 6:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunshine_noise (Anonymous) says…
GREED… it's all about greed. People should all have a place to live. There shouldn't be people living on the streets. It shouldn't be that difficult to find a place to live. It should not take an arm and a leg to rent a place to live. Yes there are people who make it bad for most of us - so why punish everyone?? There will come a time when there will be more people living on the streets then today and more empty houses and apartments.
11 June 2007 at 6:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Bowhunter99 (Anonymous) says…
I'm sorry….. BUT this is the land of EQUAL opportunity, not the land of EQUAL outcome.
If you feel so bad about this person, why don't you write a check for $1800 and help them out? Perhaps you should call their mortage company and take over the loan, then ask them to 'pay you when it's convenient'… let's see how many missed payments does it take before you say 'where is my money?'…
Why is it suddenly OK to ask the mortgage company to subsidize your living? You entered an agreement with them. They're holding on to their end of their deal. You should do the same.
11 June 2007 at 7:36 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Jean1183 (Anonymous) says…
You have it spot on, Bowhunter.
We did a 3 year “arm” for a refinance with one of the low “teaser” rates. I carefully kept track of when the arm would be up and we refinanced again before the interest rates could rise. We gained a big chunk of equity in our home, got a low interest rate, and our payments are lower than they were with the arm.
You have to listen to the details and ask questions BEFORE you sign that loan. If you refinance before the arm is up, you will be penalized. Ours had 6 months before they could adjust the interest rates so we had 6 months to refinance.
BTW, Bowhunter……..I also bowhunt.
11 June 2007 at 7:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
merrill (Anonymous) says…
Medical problems force many many into bankruptcy according to Bob Baker. Should this be the cause of bankruptcy…of course not. Not all are poor that fall into this trap but cancer can take a family financially down very quickly. Oddly enough until there is no more money there is no help.
Sharon Roullins is a perfect a why this country should have universal healthcare for all. It would be best for the economy. Certainly 100 times better than foreclosures.
11 June 2007 at 8:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KS (Anonymous) says…
Okay Merrill - Let's let someone else pay for everything. That is the answer, huh? When I read this article I thought for sure that I would see a posting suggesting that someone else pay for our healthcare as the “first” posting. What took you so long? Bowhunter hit it on the head. Take some responsiblity.
11 June 2007 at 8:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
buffalo_star (Anonymous) says…
it's not greed it's business and life is full of risk. sometimes you eat the bear and sometimes the bear eats you.
11 June 2007 at 8:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mommy3 (Anonymous) says…
We lost our home 3 years ago, for the same medical reason (my husband injured his leg at work). It is so hard to bounce back once you get behind. I don't believe the mortgage companies want to work with you, they were very hard to work with when we fell behind. We had our house sold (for more than we owed) and they turned around and said NO they were proceding with the forclosure because they can sell it for more money. If someone gets seriously ill, then it is over. My mother is very ill, and she gets approx $250/month from state. Luckily her home was paid off prior to my father's death, but she has been waiting over a year for disability to kick in. If she would have had a house payment, then she would have lost her home a long time ago. We had a horrible time finding a place to live (rent). If we found a good place, they would run a credit check and turn us down. It was a very emotional and trying time. My prayers go out to all these families. There is light at the end of the tunnel. We are preparing to finally buy our own home in the next few months……Good luck!!
11 June 2007 at 8:17 a.m.
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
11 June 2007 at 8:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
msshaden (Anonymous) says…
I wonder how those of you would act if this were you? Yeah, you may feel safe and secure now but I'd like to see what your first reaction would be if the wind blew a little hard around your neck of the woods. Things happen to people and I am sure that you haven't been fortunate all of your lives. She doesn't appear to be asking for pity, just sharing her story. I am so glad that all of you are living comfortably and not having bills and other financial nightmares darkening your doors.
11 June 2007 at 8:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
acg (Anonymous) says…
Wow I can see the typical spirit of love, compassion and charity is running rampant on the board this morning. It's so nice to know that so many of you are caring individuals, that you would take 2 minutes out of your lives to feel a bit of sympathy for a family losing their home. I especially like how none of you insinuated that poor woman is wasting money on frivolity like cable, cell phone and internet costs or how you didn't automatically assume that she didn't do everything she could to save her house. I bet she appreciates it, too. There's nothing like knowing that you're going to lose everything and that your community is rallying around you trying to, if nothing else, make you feel a bit better about the situation.
11 June 2007 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
I believe I have posted before, home ownership is not for everyone. I am sorry that the couple in Eudora are having problems, and hope the husband finds work son, but a house payment of $1500 per month on a $145,000 house tells me they got 100% financing, meaning they did not put any money down to get that house. Then they missed payments. No equity in, no equity lost. At least they did not lose money on the deal.
11 June 2007 at 8:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sourpuss (Anonymous) says…
Well, for those of your on your high horses, I hope the fall will not be too hard. If you think you can just follow the rules and have everything work out, you are wrong. Sure YOU were lucky in that disasterous things didn't happen to you, or you were lucky that you got some help when they did, but not everyone has those luxuries. Especially in single-income homes, what are you supposed to do when the breadwinner can't work or is dead? What are you supposed to do when your sweet little child is diagnosed with a horrible medical problem?
You “bootstrap” people really goad my goat. Sometimes there aren't any bootstraps. Sometimes there aren't any boots. Try a little compassion in your cold-hearted lives. And no, I don't think banks should just let things slide, but there are a LOT of obstacles for the poor out there and if you aren't poor, you don't know about them.
11 June 2007 at 8:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mom_of_three (Anonymous) says…
These families are very brave to tell their stories to the paper. Everything is going great until an unforeseen illness or injury strikes. We would have been in the same boat a couple of years ago, but fortunately we had great health insurance through our employers and decent paying jobs (now, which wasn't always the case) which covered our kid's $22,000 hospital bill.
11 June 2007 at 8:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Nick Combs (Nick Combs) says…
First of all, it stinks that this family is going through foreclosure. Not a fun process, one that I wouldn't wish on anybody.
That said, speaking generally, most people just have no freakin' clue how to manage their money. I don't know anything about this family at all, but my guess would be some lender saw them coming a mile away.
It's alot easier to get ahead if you plan ahead. Most people don't take the time to sit down once a month, write out a budget, make sure you're prepared. People also tend to get out of college heavily in student loan debt, then live off credit cards for a few years because lord forbid you not have a brand new car and plasma TV.
If people spent a few years of beans and rice instead of spending like crazy and living paycheck to paycheck, they'd be alot better prepared for their future.
Again, my condolences to this family going through foreclosure.
11 June 2007 at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
oscarfactor (Anonymous) says…
Yes, I feel bad for people who have medical situations befall them which, in turn, make it darn near impossible to pay their regular bills. Yes, I want to believe that everyone took the necessaary time to think things through before getting that “interest only” and adjustable rate mortgage loan. But some didn't, and were fleeced.
Previous comments are covering those issues.
But how about the slick marketers and fly-by-night refi companies that baited the less-than-savvy into taking on loans that by all accounts were way beyond their means? Remember the radio and TV commercials a few years back? They made it out to sound like the deal of a lifetime - low rates - interest only loans for the first year…. and now our government is trying to figure out how to bail out the poor saps who fell for it.
Predatory lenders. That's where our wrath should be focused.
11 June 2007 at 8:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Nick Combs (Nick Combs) says…
Oh, and avoid Adjustable Rate Mortgages like the Black Plague.
11 June 2007 at 8:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
KS (Anonymous) says…
offtothe right - you said it, not me, but i totally agree with you.
11 June 2007 at 8:50 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
Maybe they shouldn't have gotten themselves in over their heads and maybe started out with a smaller home! And filing bankruptcy hurts us all!
Why do people think they are beyond working two jobs, or even three? They would rather offer up excuses and file bankruptcy!
11 June 2007 at 8:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
kujayhawk (Anonymous) says…
I'm sympathetic for these people, but I also see it from a different point of view. Most mortgage companies don't begin the foreclosure process after one missed payment, it's usually only after months of not paying will they begin this process. Plus, I work at a mortgage company and have witnessed many, many good people get laid off due to the spike in foreclosure rates. So who should I be sympathetic towards, the people that aren't making their payments or my former hard working coworkers that are now out of work due to the higher foreclosure rates.
Mommy3 - I'm sorry about your hardship, but your comments make absolutely no sense. Why would the mortgage company care what you sell the house for as long as it's enough to cover the loan? If they sell the house for more than you can sell it, you'll get the difference between the sale price and the remaining balance anyway. And mortgage companies WANT you to pay, it costs the bank/mortgage company a fortune to foreclose on a home.
11 June 2007 at 8:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sunshine_noise (Anonymous) says…
AMEN sourpuss. Good for you acg and the other kind thinkers. Shame on you hard nose folks. You'd change your minds if this happened to you and folks lent a hand. Perhaps you've never had any real kindness in your lives yet and that is why you are so cold hearted like the reality companies and bankers. It's all about MONEY and image and no heart anymore these days.
11 June 2007 at 9:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
msshaden (Anonymous) says…
Actually she was working three jobs prior to getting ill.
11 June 2007 at 9:12 a.m.
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
11 June 2007 at 9:13 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Bowhunter99 (Anonymous) says…
All I've heard so far from the 'compassionates' are excuses and trying to find way to shift the blame to the mortgage company. so far, NONE of them has offered to help… the same way you're expecting the mortgage company to 'help'.
Folks… health insurance, short term disability, long term disability, life insurance… You have a choice: you either assume ALL of the risk yourself (by not buying any) OR you pay someone else to assume the risk for you.
11 June 2007 at 9:18 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
livingstone (Anonymous) says…
The message behind: If you cannot afford a home, but buy one. There are plenty of nice and affordable rentals around. I could rent a 3 bedrooms in a nice area for $800-1000, but the mortgage will usually be around $1500 or more (with 20% down). I always make sure I have certain amount of money in my bank and not all will go to mortgage.
I have friends who worked for mortgage companies and who got their properties foreclosed. It's really not the responsibilities of the mortgage companies to tell you all the details, you gotta read the fine prints and ask lots of questions before you sign.
11 June 2007 at 9:20 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
Dubai, United Arab Emarites — Hussein Ali Mubarak sits in prison, surrounded by murderers and burglars. His crime: Defaulting on his bank loans.
More than 1,200 people in Dubai’s central jail — about 40 percent of the prison population — have been convicted of not repaying money borrowed from banks so they could get married, buy a car or house, or invest in the stock market.
Jailing debtors — a practice more common in 18th-century England — illustrates the downside of this Persian Gulf city-state’s frantic economic boom.
Surrounded by so much oil and real estate wealth, many residents succumb to the temptations of a lifestyle they cannot afford
How about that?
11 June 2007 at 9:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
People who are having problems meeting their obligations could get some help by listening to Dave Ramsay:
http://www.daveramsey.com/
11 June 2007 at 9:27 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
Maybe some of us got hard noses by going through some really bad times, several times, and fighting our way out.
11 June 2007 at 9:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
samsnewplace (Anonymous) says…
acg I agree with you, where is the compassion in this world today. If you mighty one's fall on hard times in your lives, I hope you then can find the compassion you've lost along life's pathway. I feel sorry for everyone who has to lose their homes due to medical reasons. Sometimes when you have children, you cannot work two and three jobs like some dumb person above suggests. In this day and age, we will only hear more and more of this and it makes me sad for those folks. We are all about one paycheck or two away from the start of these type of troubles. Don't be so critical to judge others when you have no idea what they have done to try to keep what they have.
11 June 2007 at 9:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Nick Combs (Nick Combs) says…
I 2nd Dave Ramsey.
11 June 2007 at 9:39 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
OldEnuf2BYurDad (Anonymous) says…
“GREED… it's all about greed. People should all have a place to live.”
Do you do something that earns you money, Sunshine? Does that make you greedy?
No one who has ever benefited by borrowing money from a lender should ever complain about the “greed” of banks. Those lenders lose their shirts on more loans than you'd believe, and if they didn't lend money to risks such as you as I, we wouldn't drive cars or own homes.
The credit counselor guy was dead on: people don't educate themselves and they wait until things are out of control. Credit counseling is something to consider BEFORE you are 3 payments behind on everything.
“she doesn’t trust out-of-town companies whose offers to help seem too good to be true” - This statement makes my point. She's making decisions out of fear, not from a position of knowledge. Those out-of-town companies probably could have saved her. Now, shes in another crisis because she failed to learn and failed to act quickly.
I'm not bagging on her. She is representative of many. I've seen attorneys and accountants who acted the same way. People get scared, and they don't make good financial decisions. It's a shame. She'll either learn, or she'll repeat this history again.
11 June 2007 at 9:40 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Chicago_JHawk (Anonymous) says…
I can't figure out how you could have a $1500/month mortgage payment on a $145,000 loan. Even with 100% financing, a 30 year loan would need an interest rate over 12% to have a payment that high. Over 9% on a 15 year mortgage. Doesn't make much sense to me.
11 June 2007 at 9:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
acg (Anonymous) says…
Chicago, interest rates on loans vary according to one's credit score and debt to income ratio. She may have gotten a lender to lend her 100% of the purchase price on the house, but if her dtr is high or her credit score is lower than 700, the interest rate isn't going to be the cushy 5-7.75% offered to people who are doing well. It's going to be much higher. Oh and kujayhawk, last year my husband hemorraghed a disk in his back. He was off of work for 6 months and we got 2 payments behind on our mortage and they started the foreclosure process. 2 payments!! Not months of payments, just two. I had never paid late before. I have purchased and sold two houses using the same company so I have a 10 year history of exemplary credit with this company yet, still, two payments and bam, they're hitting me with foreclosure statements. I was lucky in that I was able to sell some land and make up those payments quickly, but others aren't always that lucky. To hear some of you tell it, life is a bed of roses and we should all have a coke and a smile and shut the f**k up. But the truth of the matter is, all it takes is one seriously rotten thing to happen and it can change your whole world. Layoff, sickness, death, etc. Earlier I said we should be compassionate towards this woman. Should I pay her bills? No. If I had extra money laying around I would pay the bills of the many broke friends I have who are going thru rough patches themselves, cause I don't know if ya'll realize it or not, but the cost of everything, except wages, is going thru the roof and lots of folks are teetering on that brink. Should we sit around and bash that woman and say “she's got cable and a cell phone and probably goes out to dinner twice a week” and “she should've had better insurance or planned for her future” blah blah blah. Truth is, none of you know this woman and unless you've been there you have no idea what she's going thru. Give her a break and stop being so damned judgmental.
11 June 2007 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
max1 (Anonymous) says…
“Dubai, United Arab Emarites … Surrounded by so much oil and real estate wealth, many residents succumb to the temptations of a lifestyle they cannot afford.”-offtotheright
Ya think?
Dubai has attracted world-wide attention through some mind-boggling, innovative real estate projects.
Sit back and peruse our photo gallery of some of the most amazing construction being done in the world today.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
In the shape of palm trees, these are the three largest man-made islands in the world.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
The latest Dubai marvel-to-be is a proposed 68-story combination hotel, apartment and office tower where the floors would rotate 360 degrees.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
These 300 islands, positioned to form the shape of a world map, are currently being constructed 4 kms offshore from Dubai in Gulf waters.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
Briefly marketed as “the world's first seven-star hotel,” the Burj Al Arab is 1,053 feet high and is the world's tallest hotel.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
Bringing new meaning to “ocean-view room,” the Hydropolis hotel is the world's first underwater luxury resort. It will sit 66 feet below the surface of the Persian Gulf and feature 220 guest suites.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
If all goes according to plan, Burj Dubai will soon become the tallest building in the world. Currently under construction in downtown Dubai, it is planned to be completed in 2008.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
The world's highest tennis court — the helipad of Burj Al Arab hotel.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
Ski Dubai is one of the largest indoor ski resorts in the world, with 22,500-square meters of indoor ski area. It is a part of the Mall of the Emirates, which is one of the largest malls in the world.
It is approximately 25 stories high and can accommodate 1,500 guests at any one time.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
Retreat to an oasis in the heart of the city where you will enjoy a breath-taking view of The Creek, the sea-water inlet that is a Dubai hallmark.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
Consisting of two skyscrapers, the Emirates Office Tower and Emirates Towers Hotel are connected by a 9,000 square metre retail boulevard, The Emirates Towers design draws on earth, sun and moon — the three Heavenly Bodies of Islam.
http://cdn.channel.aol.com/channels/0d/0…
11 June 2007 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
lmpaul (Anonymous) says…
Ok, Douglas Co. has 80 foreclosure notices now and only 39 auctioned homes in four months. One of the neighboring counties had more that 30 auctioned homes in the month of May. Jan - April there were close to 100. Several reasons these folks lost their homes, but most were comfortable until their fixed interest rate turned into varied. And one late/missed payment doesn't foreclose a home. Several of these homes were 6-8 months behind, one was a year. One morgage company told me “we don't want the house - we want people to stay in their homes. But our company has obligations that we have to meet.”
I wonder why the contractors are continuing to built huge homes (5 bathrooms) and people are continuing to get in over their heads. (I know one builder who has 3 houses he can't sell - and he has to keep electricity and heat going.) And we are bull dozing farm land to build these huge houses. I'm guessing in about 30-40 years, we will be tearing down the big houses, jackhammering the asphalt and planting food.
And, yes, I'm well aware of struggling to make all the payments every month. Our refrigerator is so bare, I'm threatening to unplug it to save on electricity. The only place I drive is to work. We have no cable, no internet and don't leave lights on. We buy our clothes at the thrift shop and, baby, we're not eating steak. I'm sorry for families who are out of their homes. By God's grace, we're still in ours.
11 June 2007 at 10:15 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
unite2revolt (Anonymous) says…
Amen to insurance, you'd think since buying a house usually requires income and homeowners insurance, that they could just change the system a bit to require new buyers to purchase insurance on their income as well. I carry a LOT of insurance, mostly because I don't want to be in a situation were my family ends up homeless just because I can't work or one of them falls ill, has an accident, etc.
I have never bought a house so I am clueless as to the dealings of mortgage lenders and real estate dealers. Why weren't these people told about Primary Mortgage Insurance, or even required to get it before they bought the house or borrowed the money? I thought it was designed for this sort of thing.
BTW I have a gut feeling that laid-off workers at a predatory lending company deserve just as much sympathy as contract workers on the Death Star. You know as a worker what kind of company you work for. A good morgage company is going to work to save its bottom line by saving homes, aka investing in people, a bad one will cut its losses and its employees to protect its shareholders dividends, aka exploiting people. Ever hear of the saying Evil never rests? Lots of hard work does not equal good work. You reap what you sow. Before you think I am unqualified to speak on this, know that I have worked for a company that exploited people for profit, nothing illegal was going on, it was just not moral. Everyone working there knew it, customers and employees were treated poorly, and the owners got rich. I am one of a very few who voluntarily left that company.
11 June 2007 at 10:22 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Jamesaust (Anonymous) says…
The irony is that we're drowning in compassion - just compassion for the wrong people.
In the 1930s, along with many other governmental programs, we began a process in this country as a matter of national policy to aid the poorer and less fortunate in putting a roof over their heads if it was at all feasible. It worked and today we have the highest rates of home ownership ever.
But, over time, like so many targeted programs, the politicians and the middle class taxpayers have converted this from a policy to aid the poor into welfare for the middle class. Approximately NINETY percent of the federal tax benefit for home ownership (a/k/a, income taxes the IRS never will see) goes to mid-to-upper middle class households that would STILL own a roof over their heads if the entire benefit was abolished. In other words, we pay people to do what they would do ANYWAY.
In contrast, very little is done for the poorer folks, most of whom (harsh judgment or not) shouldn't try and most likely never will own their own home (at least not for long as this article documents). The best policy we can make for them is to see that decent rental housing is available. And the money to pay for that is literally the tax revenue disappearing into the mid-to-upper middle class house - in Lawrence roughly $200-$300k.
(Don't get me wrong, I enjoy the feds subsidizing my lifestyle. American housing over the last half century has exploded in size and quality due to the benefit. I just find it ignores the poor and in the end a futile attempt to aid even middle class people - literally, the left hand subsidizing the right hand, which nets to $0, and leading to overinvestment in non-productive assets.)
11 June 2007 at 10:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
You people make no sense…you blame the banks, the mortgage company, the builders…you blame every one except the person who purchased the home and signed into an agreement! Sunshine is blaming: “you are so cold hearted like the reality companies and bankers”. I mean really, that just isn't a real bright comment.
It's laughable really! Let's just all file bankruptcy and see what happens!
11 June 2007 at 10:29 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Luxor (Anonymous) says…
I don't get it. If you can see that you're not going to be able to make your house payment, wouldn't it make more sense to sell the house than to let it go into foreclosure?
11 June 2007 at 10:43 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
unite2revolt (Anonymous) says…
Also I think the best quote in the article is the one were the credit counselor guy tells the reporter he is hunting a story that doesn't exist in Lawrence because our housing market has priced out the predatory lenders. Talk about expensive housing markets! It's nice to know that we have successfully kept all these poor people from being forclosed on by preventing them from being able to buy a house here in the first place. Good for us!!
11 June 2007 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
No….because it is easier to play dumb and take in all the sympathy one can get and blame everyone else but yourself!
The lady above only had the house a year. Something tells me she wasn't ready to be a homeowner. I feel sorry for the mortgage company that lent her the money!
11 June 2007 at 10:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
hawkperchedatriverfront (Anonymous) says…
She can't find the realtor who sold the house to her? That is unbelievable, it really is.
One of the problems with mortgages in Lawrence is that the property taxes are too high. if the taxes were 1percent of the valuation, then many people's taxes would drop almost 100 dollars a month on a 200, 000 home and likewise a lesser value. The extra property tax dollars figure into the mortgage payments. I have given up in this town for folks to figure that out.
They are clueless and the city is trying to cut expenses while the school district keeps digging away at the property tax coffers. USD 497 approaching 60 percent of your property tax payment.
11 June 2007 at 10:52 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
max1 (Anonymous) says…
Overvalued properties are a part of the equation that leads to foreclosures. For ten years our city council has been riding high by taxing escalating and overvalued properties, and now that real estate has taken a downturn, they're acting like crazed crackwhores needing a fix and working overtime for their pimps. Despite repeated warnings, they refused to face the reality that real estate values could not continue rising at their former pace.
January 25, 2005
Staff Reporter of the wall street journal
Local Tax Assessors in the Crosshairs
http://online.wsj.com/article/0,,SB11066…
As home prices and property taxes in many areas of the U.S. continue to reach new heights, homeowners are aiming their sights at a common target: the local tax assessor.
Angry about higher tax bills, and not content with the formal appeals process, citizens are suing assessors or calling for their ouster. In other cases, mounting pressure is prompting city councils and community organizations to arrange grilling sessions where the spotlight is on the assessor to explain why assessed values and tax bills have gone through the roof.
But the increases in assessments in many parts of the country are particularly dramatic this time around. In some areas, people who bought just a few years ago are seeing increases in their property-tax bills ranging from 30% to 40%.
A reason why assessments have jumped stems partly from a cash crunch at the local level. Many localities have been strapped for money during the past few years due to state cutbacks and the economic downturn combining with rising costs for education, law enforcement and other services. So they turned to the housing market as a growing money pot.
“People were feeling it has gotten out of control,” says Michael Luxenberg, president of Congregation Ahawas Achim B'nai Jacob and David. “You think you can afford a home and taxes keep going up a thousand dollars a year over the course of a few years. It really becomes unaffordable.”
In Canaan, N.Y., 51 residents filed a multipetitioner lawsuit in New York state Supreme Court against the town assessor, the three-member assessment review board and a host of town officials.
One resident, Michael Resnick, filed a separate lawsuit in the state high court last year after he found out that the assessed value of his two-bedroom home in Canaan rose $100,000 in one year. That meant a $3,000 rise in property taxes for Mr. Resnick to $19,250 a year, which came as a surprise because he says there were no significant improvements to the property.
Clai Sommers, a homeowner, says her property is unlivable and is set for demolition, and yet it was assessed at $317,381.
http://cdn.digitalcity.com/personalfinan…
11 June 2007 at 10:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
msshaden (Anonymous) says…
Maybe she wasn't ready to be a homeowner in Lawrence. She owns a house in Kansas City though.
11 June 2007 at 10:55 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Confrontation (Anonymous) says…
I bet that many posters claiming to be financial experts are actually lucky to have been born to wealthy parents. There are those who truly earn their living, but even more get financial gifts from their parents. No student loans. A big chunk of money for a down payment or the gift of a house. Not everyone is so lucky. The rest of us who actually have to earn what we get, need to pay close attention to what we're buying and how we do it. Although we didn't get a free ride, we shouldn't make other people pay for our mistakes (children included).
11 June 2007 at 10:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Reality_Check (Anonymous) says…
I bet fraud is actually really rare, percentagewise. More likely, mortgagors don't read the fine print before they sign, or they don't track when their rates reset. No doubt a LOT of people bought more house than they could have afforded in “the old days” because of the low teaser rates.
Home ownership just isn't for everyone.
11 June 2007 at 11:01 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
TheOriginalCA (Anonymous) says…
I make a handsome wage and my wife does not do too bad herself. We have a son who is chronically ill and has been hospitalized 14 times in the last 3 1/2 years. We are in DEEP debt and are climbing out of it. We do not whine about it nor do we expect others to bail us out. It is what it is and that's OK.
People MUST have a reserve no matter WHAT. If you don't have one then this type of thing happens. No one is at fault here though but Iam sure it feels to themn as though they are being blamed because they are the ones being punished. It seems to me as though the lender should make it a stipulation of the financing that they collect an additional $100 per month to put into escrow for medical, auto, and home maintenance emergencies.
11 June 2007 at 11:05 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Nick Combs (Nick Combs) says…
Confrontation-
I wish I had rich parents! My parents didn't pay for college, but they DID buy my first car… for $500.
I'm not a financial expert by any means, just a guy interested in money.
11 June 2007 at 11:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
offtotheright (Anonymous) says…
Everyone who was born into a wealthy family, does not work, and has it all handed to them, raise your hand.
Give me a break confrontation!
11 June 2007 at 11:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
sgl8888 (Anonymous) says…
Rent maxed out today.
11 June 2007 at 11:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Ceallach (Anonymous) says…
So a person is heartless if they do not think that big bad business is at fault? That is nonsense. Living from payday to payday with nothing going into a savings account is courting disaster. Budgeting your income will go a long way toward avoiding such tragedy. That doesn't include good intentions such as, I think I can cut back here, or there, or there. A budget gives you weekly, bi-weekly and/or monthly reality checks. If you can't afford it . . don't buy it. These are lessons I learned the hard way. It took several years for me to get back to somewhat stable financial ground. Now, the budget determines what I will buy. The peace of mind I get from that is much more important than driving a new car every couple of year, buy a newer, larger house, (having Gold internet service), or anything else.
I am concerned about the mind-set that is becoming so prevalent in today's culture. Entitlement, entitlement, entitlement, I need, I need, I need. If you read many of today's posts there seems to be an underlying theme that, while it is not new, it is reworded and ends up a lot like “From each according to their ability and to each according to their need.” Is that really what we want for America today?
11 June 2007 at 11:23 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
mommy3 (Anonymous) says…
KU….First of all, my comment made perfect sense. I guess you had to be the one going through the forclosure. Yes, the mortgage companty did care what we sold the house for. We had an offer for more than the loan was for, they denied it, and sold the house after the forclosure was final. I later received a statement saying the debt was paid, and it showed what they sold the house for. So I should have money coming….strange three years later no check.
People keep saying that you should prepare….I agree. However, when you are paying high rent and someone offers you 100% financing on your very own home…..what do you think you would do?
11 June 2007 at 11:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Godot (Anonymous) says…
“However, when you are paying high rent and someone offers you 100% financing on your very own home…..what do you think you would do?”
Walk the other way.
11 June 2007 at 11:33 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
kujayhawk (Anonymous) says…
If they truly sold it for more than you owed, you are due the balance.
11 June 2007 at 11:38 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
kujayhawk (Anonymous) says…
http://www2.ljworld.com/chats/2007/jun/1…
Mommy3 - Ask Jonathan Becker what your rights are regarding your case.
11 June 2007 at 11:50 a.m.