Advertisement

Archive for Tuesday, July 17, 2007

More for your money

Trimming budget can help the environment

July 17, 2007

Advertisement

Pinching pennies

What's your best energy-, water- or waste-saving penny-pinching story? Send entries for the Penny Pincher of the Year Contest to colorofmoney@washpost. com. The deadline is Aug. 20. Include your full name, address and phone numbers.

You also can mail entries to Michelle Singletary, Color of Money, 1150 15th St. NW, Washington, D.C. 20071.

First place wins $100, second $75 and third place, $50.

Edited versions of entries may be published whether you win or not.

I used to bathe my daughters together when they were babies and toddlers.

To tell you the truth, I didn't wash them together just to save time. I was trying to save money and water. I might still force the issue, but my 12-year-old is horrified at the thought of having her little sister see her nude.

OK, I'm kidding. But American families could save about $170 a year by retrofitting their homes with water-efficient fixtures and appliances, according to the Environmental Protection Agency.

That may not sound like a lot to some. But as I always say, when you sweat the small stuff, the money adds up.

Being environmentally friendly has a double impact. You save money and the planet. That point was driven home to me by former Vice President Al Gore's recent documentary, "An Inconvenient Truth." If more of us paid attention to the things we waste, we wouldn't have as many of the global environmental issues as we're dealing with now. Plus, we'd have a little more left in our wallets. And it's not just being water-wise that can help you save a few bucks. What about the trash you throw away?

In 2005, U.S. residents, businesses and institutions produced more than 245 million tons of municipal solid waste, according to the EPA. That translates to about 4.5 pounds of waste for each person every day. Invite me to a party, and it's likely I'll go through the trash to rescue recyclable plastic and cans.

In light of my conservation mood these days, I thought I should make my annual Penny Pincher of the Year Contest a themed challenge. This year, I'm looking for penny-pinching entries that have a positive impact on the environment.

For example, one of my all-time favorite penny pinchers is Louise Meyer, of Washington, D.C. She won the first Penny Pincher of the Year Contest in 1997 by writing about how she put solar cookers on her roof and used them to fix chicken, rice, stuffed peppers and even pasta.

At the time, Meyer said she saved about $40 a month on her electric bill during the winter and $140 in summer months by solar cooking her food and by avoiding using her clothes dryer and air conditioning.

To find out more, visit the Web site for Solar Cookers International (www.solarcookers.org). For under $50 you can buy a solar cooking kit, which includes a cookbook.

At my house, I try to be considerate of our country's hardwood forests by reusing every delivery box. I also recycle the packing material. I use labels to cover up the old shipping information.

Another previous penny-pinching champion took a plastic milk jug into the shower with him to capture the cold water that came out before the water heater kicked in. He then took the cold water and used it to fill his toilet tank to flush away his waste. By doing this, he was able to cut his water bill.

In this country, we use an average of 100 gallons of water a day at home. We could cut our water use by 30 percent. If all U.S. households installed water-efficient appliances, the country would save more than 3 trillion gallons of water and more than $17 billion dollars annually, the EPA says. And when we use less water, we reduce the amount of energy needed to supply that water.

Comments

gr 6 years, 9 months ago

I heard that for the last 100 years the alarmists have been yo-yoing between warming and cooling. First it was an illustration of an iceberg setting around buildings. Now it's the ocean. No matter what, it's a crisis. If you have noticed, the phrase has shifted from "global warming" to "climate change". That's because some have feared it may change to cooling, and then all their attempts to manipulate people would fail. If by producing CO2 causes warming, and if the earth is cooling, then we should produce all the more to prevent another ice age. 'Drive an SUV to save the earth!' Not exactly what the busy-body controllers want to happen.

So, using preemptive thinking, it's turned into "climate change". Whether it's cooling or warming, producing CO2 causes it. WE are the fault of whatever the current climate is. Whether it's CO2 or anything else, it's because of US. Then they look for people they don't like or envy - or both. Don't like SUVs; find out what they use/produce than what they drive. Then say THEY are the ones who are causing bad weather. Don't like cell-phones. They are causing bad weather.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.