Archive for Thursday, July 12, 2007

Religion as campaign tactic

July 12, 2007


Some unknown author once said, "Everybody should believe in something; I believe I'll have another drink."

Democratic senator and presidential candidate Hillary Clinton took a less cynical and more substantive approach to faith in a recent interview with The New York Times. The quality and depth of one's relationship with God should be personal and beyond the judgment of others, unless one is running for president and chooses to talk about it as part of a campaign plan to win the election.

Democrats have been encouraged and coached by liberal evangelical Christian Jim Wallis of Sojourners magazine to talk about their faith in an attempt to capture a small slice of the religious vote that has mostly gone to conservative Republicans in the last several election cycles.

In a Times' front-page story about Sen. Clinton's Methodist faith, there are pictures of her in Sunday school as a young girl, pictures of two ministers who "influenced Hillary Rodham on faith and social responsibility," and two pictures of her praying.

One of the ministers from her youth, Rev. Donald Jones, says of his messages then, "I wouldn't have focused so much on personal salvation. I would have focused more on social responsibility." In theological circles this is known as "works salvation," the notion that one can do enough good deeds to earn God's approval and enter Heaven. While James, the Apostle, writes "faith without works is dead" (James 2:20), he means that works done as a result of saving faith for the purpose of leading others to that same faith - not for the sole objective of improving one's own circumstances on earth - find approval in God's sight, while works that are separated from a saving faith message are, as the prophet Isaiah says about such human righteousness, like "filthy rags" (Isaiah 64:6).

Even the Times suggests the destination of a strictly "social gospel": "Mrs. Clinton sometimes was a guest speaker at an adult Sunday school class, a class that some members complained normally resembled Rotary Club lectures because it often addressed nonreligious topics." To paraphrase James, if faith without works is dead, so also are works without faith.

Liberal faith, which is to say a faith that discounts the authority of Scripture in favor of a constantly evolving, poll-tested relevancy to modern concerns - such as the environment, what kind of SUV Jesus would drive, larger government programs and other "do-good" pursuits - ultimately morphs into societal and self-improvement efforts and jettisons the life-changing message of salvation, forgiveness of sins and a transformed life.

If the newspaper story is accurate, this is where Mrs. Clinton is on her faith: "In a brief quiz about her theological views, Mrs. Clinton said she believed in the resurrection of Jesus, though she described herself as less sure of the doctrine that being a Christian is the only way to salvation."

This is a politician speaking, not a person who believes in the central tenets of Christianity. The same book that tells of the Resurrection, also quotes Jesus as saying "I am the way, the truth and the life; no one comes to the Father but by me" (John 14:6). One might ask, which the reporter did not, that if there are other ways to God than through Jesus, why did He bother to come to earth, allow Himself to be crucified and suffer rejection? He might have stayed in Heaven and told people about a spiritual GPS system that would get them there another way.

About the accuracy of Scripture, Sen. Clinton serves up theological mush: "The whole Bible gives you a glimpse of God and God's desire for a personal relationship (good, so far), but we can't possibly understand every way God is communicating with us. I've always felt that people who try to shoehorn in their cultural and social understandings of the time into the Bible might be actually missing the larger point."

That is precisely the point of liberal Christianity, to which Sen. Clinton subscribes.

Sen. Clinton is entitled to whatever faith she wants to practice, but when she uses it as an election tactic, she should not be allowed to alter classic Christian theology.

- Cal Thomas is a columnist for Tribune Media Services.


Crossfire 10 years, 6 months ago

As long as politicians can use religion to get elected they will. They will continue to use religion to divide our nation. As long as people buy into the belief that a 'man of faith" is a better leader we will continue to get the kind of leaders hat has taken use where we are now. We need leaders that will work for us based on real issues. Elect public servants who serve us.

Speakout 10 years, 6 months ago

Not every great leader is a Christian and not every Christian is a great leader. Moses wasn't, Mohammad wasn't, Abraham wasn't, and Jesus wasn't. Obviously God's intentions are still unknown to mankind if He permits great leaders to come from other faiths. But each of these leaders believed in One God and I believe that is the faith He wants.

thusspokezarathustra 10 years, 6 months ago

"While James, the Apostle, writes "faith without works is dead" (James 2:20)"

but didn't Galatians 2:16 say, " Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified."

James 2:24 24 "Ye see then how that by works a man is justified, and not by faith only."

So which is it? Are you justified by faith or not?

Perhaps the mush isn't in the mouth but in the bible itself.

james bush 10 years, 6 months ago

Islam/muslim..........the only religion that the aclu finds acceptable:public foot-bathing accommodations at taxpayer expense so they can pray and time to pray in schools during the school day. Allah loves the aclu.

acg 10 years, 6 months ago

When is everyone going to realize that religion--all religion-- only spawns insanity. Come on! Do ya'll actually believe there's an invisible man in the sky that knows if you've been good or bad? I can't imagine being so easily cowed by such obvious nonsense.

drewdun 10 years, 6 months ago

Cal Thomas is the biggest hack in the game today.

rabid_yeller_dawg 10 years, 6 months ago

Mexico has separation of church and state. If a politician brings religion into his speeches, there is a hefty fine. I'd like to see that here. This is a nation that is supposed to represent all faiths. What happened? Whatever it was has resulted in something past stupidity... something akin to mob rule... and I am not at all certain this nation can recover from it.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.