Archive for Friday, January 26, 2007
Kansas Senate considers opposition to increasing troops in Iraq
State Sen. Donald Betts filed the resolution
January 26, 2007
Advertisement
Topeka — Opposition to President Bush's troop increase in Iraq surfaced in the Kansas Statehouse on Friday.
State Sen. Donald Betts, D-Wichita, filed a resolution that would put Kansas lawmakers on record of being opposed to Bush's call for 21,500 more troops in Iraq.
At a minimum, the resolution states, Bush should seek approval from Congress before sending more troops, and that Congress should prohibit the president from spending taxpayer dollars on an escalation in Iraq without his first seeking congressional approval.
"We are sending 18- and 19-year-olds, at the start of their lives, to Iraq, and they are not coming home," Betts said. The war has claimed the lives of more than 3,000 U.S. soldiers with more than 22,000 wounded.
Bush has said an increase in troop strength is needed to quell violence in the war zone.
But Betts said most Americans and military experts oppose the troop buildup.
If adopted, the resolution would have no legal authority to force Bush or Congress to do anything.
But Betts said it would give Bush, a Republican, "a clear message" of how people in a predominantly Republican state feel about the war.
State Senate Majority Leader Derek Schmidt, R-Independence, said Betts' resolution was unnecessary because state lawmakers can't affect the war effort.
"These are serious issues but clearly they are not state issues," Schmidt said.
The measure -- Senate Concurrent Resolution 1605 -- will likely be referred to a committee next week.
In the U.S. Senate, the Foreign Relations Committee adopted a nonbinding resolution saying the troop increase in Iraq was "not in the national interest" of the United States.
But the Bush administration has stated it intends to proceed with its plan.
More like this
- Lawmakers disagree with troop increase 8 comments / January 27, 2007
- Senators unveil resolution against Iraq war plan 1 comment / January 18, 2007
- More Republicans oppose U.S. troop increase, press for accountability 4 comments / January 23, 2007
- Bush to add 21,500 U.S. troops to Iraq effort January 11, 2007
- Brownback critical of surge, Senate resolution opposing surge 2 comments / January 25, 2007
Top ads RSS
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 7 comments
- Quiet revolution taking place in America November 25, 2009 · 122 comments
- Two treated at hospital after fight outside Cadillac Ranch November 26, 2009 · 7 comments
- At Fambrough’s urging, fans show support for KU football November 26, 2009 · 4 comments
- United Way support November 26, 2009 · 4 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 62 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 76 comments
- Nation has right to ask ‘why?’ November 21, 2009 · 143 comments
- Going soft? November 23, 2009 · 2 comments
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009 · 40 comments
- KU says student didn't follow proper lab procedures before exposure to toxic chemical November 25, 2009
- At Fambrough’s urging, fans show support for KU football November 26, 2009
- KU gobbles up Grizzlies November 26, 2009
- School district may have to tap contingency fund November 24, 2009
- Lawrence likely to land distribution center November 24, 2009
- FSHS student killed in wreck December 30, 2003
- Collins shares wealth November 26, 2009
- Kansas ranks 24th in nation when it comes to health November 24, 2009
- Dugan Arnett’s KU football notebook November 26, 2009
- Jayhawks thankful for break November 26, 2009
26 January 2007
at 1:57 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Slav (Anonymous) says…
They're considering opposition? And this is news how? Anything but active opposition is consideration, so this article strikes me as asinine.
Are there hidden cameras somewhere?
26 January 2007
at 2:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
oldgoof (Anonymous) says…
why don't they vote on speaking French in Quebec too, while they have idle time.
26 January 2007
at 3:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
pilch (Anonymous) says…
the state ought to worry abou state matters
26 January 2007
at 3:35 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigDog (Anonymous) says…
Gosh …… would hate to focus on issues that they have some power over …..like alternative energy issues, health care, seniors or university classrooms ….. and if they have ran out of ideas this early maybe there should be an official state water or state wood that they could work on.
26 January 2007
at 3:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Slav (Anonymous) says…
um, I believe the state water is Aquafina.
26 January 2007
at 3:54 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BigDog (Anonymous) says…
Damn Slav ….. guess there is one less major item on their political agenda for the year.