Paris It's a trend that counts Leonardo DiCaprio and Al Gore among its followers: making life "carbon neutral" by tree planting and other environmentally friendly efforts to curb emissions of heat-trapping carbon dioxide.
The theme is a hot one as scientists in Paris this week prepare to issue a major report on global warming - but critics say the movement is counterproductive, even a scam.
The practicalities of "offsetting" carbon dioxide emitted when flying, driving cars, even getting married are increasingly simple.
A growing array of companies offer to calculate how much carbon dioxide such activities give off and how much money should be given to projects that, in theory at least, will reduce emissions by an equivalent amount somewhere else in the world. It can be done in minutes online, paid for by credit card.
Opponents say offsetting gives people the mistaken impression that they can keep on polluting or that such individual efforts can solve global warming, when much more fundamental change is needed.
They also warn that offsetting companies lack oversight and transparency, and that the environment would be better served by people reducing their own pollution and demanding that governments end the use of carbon-producing fossils fuels.
The carbon neutral trend "tries to make money from tapping into consumers' guilt," said Jutta Kill of SinksWatch, an environmental group that monitors such projects.
"It's worse than doing nothing. ... Those who are in a role-model function like Al Gore do not do the movement for effective action on climate change a favor by promoting carbon offsets in the way he does."
But green business can be good business, especially when a trend is so hot: The New Oxford American Dictionary declared "carbon neutral" its "word of the year for 2006," for inclusion in its 2007 edition.
Climat Mundi's online "CO2 calculator" works out that a round-trip Paris to London flight for one person in economy class produces 0.2 tons of carbon dioxide.
It says the best thing is to take the train but if flying is unavoidable, the fledgling French company suggests contributing $5.31 to two projects it funds. One provides Eritrea with stoves that burn less wood. The other helps maintain a plant near Sydney, Australia, that captures methane - another greenhouse gas - from rotting trash at an adjacent landfill and burns it to power electricity-producing turbines.
Eric Parent, an engineer who quit a steady job in waste management to start up Climat Mundi last June, says polluting without offsetting could become as frowned-upon socially as littering in public.
"It remains socially very acceptable to vacation on the other side of the world or to travel for a weekend to another country in Europe on a low-cost airline," Parent said in a telephone interview. "Growing awareness of global warming and the fact that we, as individuals, can now compensate for our emissions - which wasn't the case four to five years ago ... will, in my opinion, make traveling without compensating far less acceptable."
DiCaprio in the past has offset his carbon through organizations that plant trees and is "looking at various options" for 2007, according to Chuck Castleberry of the Leonardo DiCaprio Foundation, which the "Titanic" star started in 1998 to promote environmental awareness.
The actor switched recently to a Honda Accord hybrid car and has solar panels on his Los Angeles home.