Advertisement

Archive for Friday, December 21, 2007

Airport screeners become unpopular face of government

December 21, 2007

Advertisement

— Hand sanitizer makes it through security in one airport, then it's confiscated at another. Screening lines back up because only two of six lanes are open. And then there's the occasional all-too-intimate patdown.

Those complaints and other frustrations make the nation's airport security agency about as popular as the IRS.

Indeed, only the Federal Emergency Management Agency, still suffering from its mishandling of Hurricane Katrina, ranks below the Transportation Security Administration among the least-liked federal agencies, according to a new Associated Press-Ipsos poll.

TSA tied with the perennially unpopular tax collectors in a favorability ranking of a dozen executive branch agencies.

"I am so frustrated with TSA that I am ready to stop flying," one traveler wrote in a Sept. 7 complaint filed with the agency. "I'm sure this doesn't matter to you because my tax dollars are already paying you."

The AP poll, conducted Monday through Wednesday, found that the more people travel, the less they like TSA. But it also found that 53 percent of air travelers think TSA does a "very" or "somewhat" good job.

The inconvenience of security was the top complaint of air travelers, mentioned by 31 percent of those who had taken at least one trip in the past year. That figure rose to 40 percent for those who have taken five to 10 trips.

TSA's parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, also ranked at the bottom of an index of consumer satisfaction released this week, supplanting the IRS as the prime subject of grumbling in that survey. The authoritative American Customer Satisfaction Index questioned 10,000 people about their experiences with the federal government.

TSA officials say they understand the frustration and are working to minimize hassles. They say while it can be annoying, airport screening is essential because intelligence reports show aviation remains a top target for terrorists.

A review of complaints the traveling public lodged with TSA in September helps explain the low standing. While passengers generally understand TSA's mission, they could do without certain parts of the pre-boarding experience.

Take, for example, a mother and daughter traveling out of the Dallas/Fort Worth airport on Sept. 4. In an e-mailed complaint to TSA, the mother said the TSA screener was rude and inconsiderate. While she was in secondary screening, the mother was made to face away from her daughter. "Someone could have taken my daughter," the woman wrote. "I understand you have to have security, but your people don't need to be rude!!!"

Nearly 9,000 such complaints flowed into TSA between January and October of this year, and the agency made a selection of them available at the request of The Associated Press.

Paul C. Light, professor of public policy at New York University, said he's not surprised that TSA and the IRS are tied for low public esteem.

Yet he defended TSA as misunderstood, because it's highly visible yet can't brag about its successes. "It's an agency that's damned if it does, damned if it doesn't," Light said.

TSA responds to every complaint it receives, said spokeswoman Ellen Howe, adding that each complaint is forwarded to the federal security director at the airport in question.

In the cases AP reviewed, the most common response was a form letter, apologizing for inconveniences, often blaming the problem of long lines on the local airport and forwarding complaints about inappropriate patdowns to the airports where they occurred.

Out of all the contacts TSA receives, only about 2 percent are complaints, Howe said.

Howe also defended the agency's 43,000 screeners and said the public needs to know that they are "good people motivated by the mission."

"Our officers take a lot of disrespect from the public," Howe said. "These people are on the front lines and they deserve our respect."

Screeners make about $30,000 a year.

Comments

imastinker 7 years ago

The real issue is the ambiguity about what is allowed. One screener allows measuring tools shorter than 12", and another does not consider a machinists level a measuring tool. They point out that I can hit someone in the head with it, I point out that I could probably do as much damage with my laptop or my fist.

unfortunately, these tools are very expensive and delicate, and damage can occur by checking it. But when I point out that it is a measuring tool less than 12" long they get mad becuase they do not recognize it. Some take deodorant over 3oz, others say that they only take gel deodorant (mine was stick deodorant). Contact solution is only available in containers 4oz and bigger. Some say I need a prescription fo that to take it, others allow it. Others don't care if I do have a prescription.

If they could manage to be somewhat consistent and not continually cause me to have my stuff taken (I travel regularly and know what the rules are) I may dislike them less.

Haiku_Cuckoo 7 years ago

Instead of whining, people should know the routine ahead of time and make preparations before they get in line:

-Have ID and boarding pass in hand. -Take out your laptop. -Remove your shoes. -Put metal objects in the bowl. -Keep liquids in small containers.

I never get hassled and I never hold up the line. Use common sense people!

Confrontation 7 years ago

There are a lot of very inconsiderate travelers, as well. I can't blame these screeners for getting annoyed by all of those "I'm super special and more important than you" idiots.

imastinker 7 years ago

Haiku - did you read what I said? I travel regularly and know that even your advice is rong. Liquids have to be in a clear quart size ziploc bag.

What about taking my stick deodorant? What about not allowing tools when they are clearly used fo measuring?

Commenting has been disabled for this item.