City, county plan growth / LJWorld.com

Archive for Thursday, August 16, 2007

August 16, 2007

Land use reviewed

Local leaders get a glimpse at a possible new look for areas south and east of Lawrence. Enlarge video

Lawrence-Douglas County Planning Department

This map of proposed development in southern Lawrence would designate much of the area around the Wakarusa River as open space within the 100-year floodplain. It also envisions commercial areas along U.S. Highway 59, south of 31st Street; low- and medium-density residential developments would fill in much of the rest of the space between 31st Street and the Wakarusa River.

Related document

Revised Southern Development Plan ( .PDF )

Drafts plotting future development around southern and southeastern Lawrence are being well received by Lawrence and Douglas County leaders.

Commissioners from the two governments met Wednesday morning to review the plans with the Lawrence-Douglas County Planning Commission and the planning staff.

The southern plan designates much of the area around the Wakarusa River as open space within the 100-year floodplain. It also envisions commercial areas along U.S. Highway 59, south of 31st Street; low- and medium-density residential developments would fill in much of the rest of the space between 31st Street and the Wakarusa River.

"I do like what I see," City Commissioner Mike Dever said. "Although they are just colors and shapes on a map right now, I have looked over that area and tried to match up with what is currently there and what is proposing to be there, and I think that is important. You look at current land before you start dictating future land use."

The southern development plans include mostly areas south of 31st Street. The southeastern area plan covers an area between O'Connell Road and East 1750 Road - mostly industrial and multi- and single-family residential uses.

The southern development plan covers 2,038 acres with the largest areas for open space and potential park developments and vacant farmland. The southeastern plan covers 1,200 acres.

The Planning Commission will go over the proposals, and, once approved, each will be forwarded to the city and county commissions.

The maps and the proposals can be found online at the planning department's Web site at www.ci.lawrence.ks.us/planning/.

Both plans are revisions of earlier documents. The original southern development plan was adopted in 1994 by the City Commission. The new version updates the plan boundaries and takes into consideration existing facilities and transportation routes. The southeastern area plan was rejected by the city and county commissioners because it extended commercial and industrial land too close to residential areas.

County Commissioner Charles Jones said that while he generally liked the plans, he noted the need for additional transportation planning. Routes need to be developed that would take traffic south out of western Lawrence beyond the existing western leg of the South Lawrence Trafficway, he said. Major streets such as Kasold Drive and Wakarusa Drive, for example, do not extend that far, he added.

City Commissioners Boog Highberger and Dever agreed. The latest plans don't adequately address the southern route question, and that is something the city's Transportation 2030 Committee will have to address, Highberger said.

Waiting and planning later means increased costs, especially in building and maintaining bridges, Dever said.

"We need to be concerned about moving people across the Wakarusa River if we are going to extend development to the south," Dever said.

Discussion

LJWorld.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

16 August 2007
at 6:19 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

LogicMan (Anonymous) says…

“We need to be concerned about moving people across the Wakarusa River …”

The Wakarusa is a natural boundary for Lawrence. Continue going west, and improve what's already in Lawrence. Also consider going up more often, rather than out, as the city matures.
16 August 2007
at 6:59 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

logrithmic (Anonymous) says…

Bridges are expensive unless the feds help you out with them. Of course, since the feds are more interested in illegally invading and occupying countries and spying on its own citizenry, they have little money to invest in infrastructure. It appears that west and up are the “natural” growth areas, but don't expect our developturds to build according to rational planning.
16 August 2007
at 7:11 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

logrithmic (Anonymous) says…

BTW, the map is thoroughly misleading and the Journal World should know this. The map does not show the development to the southeast to 1750 Road. Instead the map depicts an area that ends at Haskell Avenue. But the article clearly states 1750 Road as the boundary of the “planned” growth. A more honest accounting would have shown the area mentioned in the article. Perhaps the LJ World will update the map later today????
16 August 2007
at 8:48 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

oldgoof (Anonymous) says…

If the map is misleading it is not the LJW's, Logrithmic, it is the planning department's.
16 August 2007
at 9:06 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

logrithmic (Anonymous) says…

Goof,

No. The planning department did not put it on this website (or in the printed edition). The Journal-World did. And the planning department has the full map. This map should've been used.

So Goof, your name at least is not misleading…..
16 August 2007
at 1:14 p.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

LogicMan (Anonymous) says…

“So let's see what kind of retail is proposed south of 33rd and Iowa on 59”

Hmmm … a Tractor Supply Company (TSC) store, a truck stop/gas station, a Cracker Barrel, and a Microtel/Motel 6 seem logical.

No, I'm not kidding.