Advertisement

Archive for Friday, August 10, 2007

Free gun lock program faces funding challenge

August 10, 2007

Advertisement

Gun locks

Douglas County Sheriff's Lt. Kari Wempe shows how to use gun locks. Enlarge video

Federal budget cuts could hinder Douglas County's efforts to distribute free safety locks to gun owners.

The Douglas County Sheriff's Office has been distributing the locks - which, when properly used, prevent the accidental firing of a firearm - for about two years. The Douglas County District Attorney's Office joined the program in January.

The locks were paid for by a U.S. Department of Justice program, Project Childsafe, administered by the National Shooting Sports Foundation.

"They're used in addition to good, safe gun-handling inside the homes," sheriff's office spokeswoman Lt. Kari Wempe said of the locks. "We want our children and our families to be safe."

About 200 locks have been distributed this year through the sheriff's office, Lawrence Memorial Hospital, Douglas County Health Department and pediatricians' offices.

Since the program began in 2002, more than 220,000 locks have been distributed by roughly 300 agencies statewide. Nationwide, 35 million locks have been distributed, said Shari LeGate of Project Childsafe.

Funding for the national program has decreased nearly every year since 2002, when it had a $5 million budget, LeGate said. In 2006-07, the funding was cut to $912,000, a $4 million decrease from the previous year's budget.

This year Project Childsafe has received 560,000 gun lock requests nationwide and has been able to fulfill only about half of those, LeGate said.

Douglas County District Attorney Charles Branson said he plans to seek other funding sources, such as forfeiture money from illegal drug seizures, for the gun lock program.

Comments

DonQuipunch 6 years, 8 months ago

Well, that sounds like a good rationale for singling it out, then.

*wanking gesture

0

SettingTheRecordStraight 6 years, 8 months ago

The Constitution does not allow the government to collect taxes and redistribute those funds as a subsidy for trigger lock programs. In fact, the Constitution does not allow for federal spending on the majority of programs the government is involved in today.

0

scenebooster 6 years, 8 months ago

SettingThe RecordStraight: making the world safer for fetuses and more dangerous for already been born kids since 2006.

0

staff04 6 years, 8 months ago

Yes, STRS, please explain "unconstitutional."

0

DonQuipunch 6 years, 8 months ago

Unconstitutional?

And "Taxpayer-Subsidized Government Program" is a bit redundant, no?

Figured you nutty left-wingers would be all up in arms that any access to firearms--legitimate or not--isn't being limited as much as humanly possible.

0

SettingTheRecordStraight 6 years, 8 months ago

The headline should have read, "Unconstitional Taxpayer-Subsidized Government Program Facing Cuts."

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.