Archive for Tuesday, April 17, 2007
Kansas Supreme Court to hear smoking-ban arguments
Hearing set for next week
April 17, 2007
Advertisement
Lawrence's smoking ban will be aired out next week before the Kansas Supreme Court.
The court has set oral arguments on the constitutionality of the ban for 1:30 p.m. April 25.
A decision by the court could affect not only Lawrence's ban on smoking, which has been in effect since July 2004, but similar bans statewide.
The Lawrence ban has been challenged by Dennis Steffes, owner of Last Call and Coyote nightclubs, who says the ordinance is unconstitutionally vague and illegally supercedes state law.
But city officials have said they have the authority to establish a smoking prohibition inside businesses based on local government's home-rule authority to protect the health and safety of citizens.
More like this
- Smoking ban to face Supreme court test April 17, 2007
- No ruling on smoking ban, Martin Miller murder conviction 10 comments / June 8, 2007
- City smoking ban challenge to be heard 2 comments / April 18, 2007
- No rulings issued by Supreme Court on Lawrence cases 2 comments / June 9, 2007
- State court will decide legality of smoking ban 79 comments / August 29, 2006
Top ads RSS
- Customer Service Representatives • Various shifts available • Monday - ...
- NEUVANT HOUSE of Lawrence Personal Memory Care Seeking Administrator for ...
- IT Manager Medium sized, multi-state service company has opening for ...
- Cleaning Technician- 5 eves. per wk, 3 hrs per night; ...
- HOLIDAY RUSH $400/$600 week. 30 openings available in various departments ...
Marketplace
Arts & Entertainment · Bars · Theatres · Restaurants · Coffeehouses · Libraries · Antiques · Services
- Miserable ending November 29, 2009 · 26 comments
- Suicide numbers climbing November 29, 2009 · 12 comments
- Two arrested after altercation at Henry's November 29, 2009 · 23 comments
- Jobless recovery will haunt Democrats November 29, 2009 · 27 comments
- On the street: With the retirement of U.S. Rep. Dennis Moore, what characteristics would you like to see in a new congressman? November 29, 2009 · 25 comments
- Poll: Should the Kansas Legislature pursue opportunities to privatize or outsource some government services? November 27, 2009 · 26 comments
- Blog: If This Is The End, How Will Mangino Be Remembered? November 29, 2009 · 5 comments
- One dead after car-motorcycle accident near 27th and Missouri November 27, 2009 · 62 comments
- Senate report: Bin Laden was within grasp of U.S. troops November 29, 2009 · 21 comments
- Poll: Should Mark Mangino be the head coach of the Kansas Jayhawks next season? November 28, 2009 · 13 comments
- Two arrested after altercation at Henry's November 29, 2009
- 'Science as a Contact Sport' probes global warming battle November 29, 2009
- Behind the Lens: Zoom lenses drop in price and shed some pounds November 29, 2009
- Miserable ending November 29, 2009
- KU teams hone ultimate Frisbee skills November 29, 2009
- Leaving Las Vegas: Sin City on losing end of rough economy November 29, 2009
- Reese's Pieces: Kitty Reese screen-prints designs with a darker ‘Holly Hobbie Country Rainbow Brite’ aesthetic November 29, 2009
- Lawrence women's chorale announces holiday concert November 29, 2009
- Victim ID’d in fatal car-cycle crash November 29, 2009
- Something special for furry friends November 29, 2009


17 April 2007
at 12:24 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
esubrett (Anonymous) says…
You know what is more “unconstitutionally vague and illegally supercedes state law”, people getting shot in and near your establishment. Priorities man, priorities.
17 April 2007
at 2:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Sigmund (Anonymous) says…
Anyone have a link to the documents online?
17 April 2007
at 2:22 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
gsandell (Anonymous) says…
Gov't can't control the use of illegal drugs in our cities, counties and state, yet they want to control use of a legal product because most that use tobacco are law-abiding citizens. Law-abiding citizens will go along with the ban because they feel they have no choice.
Gov't loves a product like tobacco—they can tax the hell out of it and if you complain, you are a bum.
If gov't was really against the use of tobacco, they would refuse all of the tax money and tobacco settlement money that they glean from tobacco user's and companies.
17 April 2007
at 3:07 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Bladerunner (Anonymous) says…
His arguement?
You are more likely to get lead poisoning from flying bullets at Last Call than cancer from second hand smoke.
17 April 2007
at 3:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Bladerunner (Anonymous) says…
oops ….I meant argument.
17 April 2007
at 4:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
acg (Anonymous) says…
Here Here gsandell. If you want it to be banned everywhere, make it illegal and stop getting your share. If you insist on taxing it, and making millions off of the sale of tobacco products then let us smoke and p*ss off!
You know what the #1 cause of death among non smokers is? B*tching at smokers!!!!
17 April 2007
at 6:53 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
crazyks (Anonymous) says…
Uh…acg…gsandell is on YOUR side…