Archive for Monday, July 3, 2006

Doctors weigh whether to call children ‘obese’

July 3, 2006


— Is it OK for doctors and parents to tell children and teens they're fat?

That seems to be at the heart of a debate on whether to replace the fuzzy language favored by the U.S. government with the painful truth - telling kids if they're obese or overweight.

Labeling a child obese might "run the risk of making them angry, making the family angry," but it addresses a serious issue head-on, said Dr. Reginald Washington, a Denver pediatrician and co-chair of an American Academy of Pediatrics obesity task force.

"If that same person came into your office and had cancer, or was anemic, or had an ear infection, would we be having the same conversation?" he asked. "There are a thousand reasons why this obesity epidemic is so out of control, and one of them is no one wants to talk about it."

The diplomatic approach adopted by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and used by many doctors avoids the word "obese" because of the stigma. The CDC also calls overweight kids "at risk of overweight."

Those favoring a change say the current terms encourage denial of a problem affecting increasing numbers of U.S. youngsters.

Trisha Leu, 17, who has lost 60 pounds since undergoing gastric band surgery in March, weeds the garden in the front yard of her Wheeling, Ill., home. The American Medical Assn. is considering a proposal to label children in the highest weight category as "obese" instead of the current term, "overweight." Trisha says she dislikes the term obese because she thinks "it sounds mean. It doesn&squot;t sound good."

Trisha Leu, 17, who has lost 60 pounds since undergoing gastric band surgery in March, weeds the garden in the front yard of her Wheeling, Ill., home. The American Medical Assn. is considering a proposal to label children in the highest weight category as "obese" instead of the current term, "overweight." Trisha says she dislikes the term obese because she thinks "it sounds mean. It doesn't sound good."

Under a proposal studied by a committee of the American Medical Assn., the CDC and others, fat children would get the same labels as adults: overweight or obese.

The change "would certainly make sense. It would bring the U.S. in line with the rest of the world," said Tim Cole, a professor of medical statistics at the University College London's Institute of Child Health.

The existing categories are convoluted and "rather ironic, since the U.S. leads the world in terms of obesity," Cole said. "There must be an element of political correctness."

Confusing language

The debate illustrates just how touchy the nation is about its weight problem.

Obese "sounds mean. It doesn't sound good," said Trisha Leu, 17, who thinks the proposed change is a bad idea.

The Wheeling, Ill., teen has lost 60 pounds since March as part of an adolescent obesity surgery study at the University of Illinois at Chicago.

"When you're young, you don't understand what obese means," Leu said. "I still don't understand it."

The CDC adopted the current terms in 1998, using weight-to-height ratios and growth charts from a generation of children much slimmer than today's.

Children are said to be "at risk for overweight" if their body-mass index is between the 85th and 94th percentiles. They're "overweight" if their body-mass index is in the 95th percentile or higher - or greater than at least 95 percent of youngsters the same age and gender.

Many pediatricians understand the first category to mean "overweight" and the second one to mean "obese," said the CDC's Dr. William Dietz. He said the word "obese" was purposely avoided because of negative connotations but conceded that many pediatricians find the current language confusing.

Adding to the confusion is the fact that about 17 percent of U.S. children are in the highest category, and that almost 34 percent are in the second-highest category. That sounds like a mathematical impossibility, but it's because the percentiles are based on growth charts from the 1960s and 1970s, when far fewer kids were too fat.

A diplomatic choice

In children, determining excess weight is tricky, partly because of rapid growth - especially in adolescence - that sometimes can temporarily result in a high body-mass index.

For children in at least the 95th percentile, high BMI "is almost invariably excess fat," Dietz said. But there's less certainty about those in the second-highest category. So to avoid mislabeling and "traumatizing" kids, the CDC chose to be diplomatic, Dietz said.

The committee, set up by the American Medical Assn., involves obesity experts from 14 professional organizations including the American Academy of Pediatrics. Their mission is to update recommendations for prevention, diagnosis and management of obesity in children.

Final recommendations are expected in September, and the participating groups will decide individually whether to adopt them.

Dr. Ronald Davis, the medical association's president-elect, said it was unclear whether the expert committee could develop a consensus on the obesity terms.

"There are seemingly legitimate arguments on both sides," said Davis, a preventive medicine specialist with Henry Ford Health System in Detroit.

Maria Bailey of Pompano Beach, Fla., whose 12-year-old daughter, Madison, is self-consciously overweight, opposes the proposed change. She said their pediatrician has told her daughter to exercise more and see a nutritionist, but "hasn't told her that she's in a (weight) category."

"We're already raising a generation of teenagers who have eating disorders," Bailey said. "I think it would just perpetuate that."

Paola Fernandez Rana of Fort Lauderdale, Fla., has a 9-year old daughter who at 40 pounds overweight is considered obese. Rana said doctors refer to it as the "o-word" in front of her daughter "in an effort not to upset her."

"They very clearly told me she was obese," Rana said. But she said she agreed with the term and thinks that at some point it should be used with her daughter, too.

"Obviously I don't want my daughter to be overweight, but : in order to change the situation, she is ultimately going to need to hear it," Rana said.


Christine Pennewell Davis 11 years, 6 months ago

it seems that the world has become a little to political, If calling a child obese is what is needed to wake up the parent and maybe even the child,depending on age for understanding of the word, then by all means step on a few toes and say the word. If that does not work say fat people really do need to realize not all problems can be solved by being politicaly correct.

fighting4fape 11 years, 6 months ago

A word of caution here as well. We need standards on what is considered Obese or "risk of obsese" or what have you.

As a parent of a 6 year old, I was shocked to recieve a letter from the School nurse this year telling me our son was "at risk of obsesity". I am actually underweight and my husband is right in the range of healthy weight according to our doctors.

My son has numerous physicians that he sees for other health reasons. They tell me he is FINE and that the way they are measuring body fat is not exact because they do not take into account, bone structure and arm length.

I too am saddened when I see a child who is obviously overweight. But I also think that we need some standards here. You cannot label a child "over wieght" or "obsese" just because their growth is faster than others. In our son's case, he's tall and solid. But you can still see his ribs.

Here's even a better about education and not just a pamphlet that says "your kid's something about it". No wonder many of us took offense.


Commenting has been disabled for this item.