Archive for Thursday, December 21, 2006
Sebelius won’t sign off on Kline’s district attorney appointment
December 21, 2006
Advertisement
Topeka Gov. Kathleen Sebelius refused Wednesday to endorse recently defeated Attorney General Phill Kline's selection as Johnson County district attorney, but Kline's appointment became official nevertheless.
Kline, a Republican, will replace Paul Morrison, the Democrat who ousted him from statewide office, as the top prosecutor in the state's most populous county.
State law denied Sebelius the power to block Kline's appointment once GOP activists in Johnson County settled on it. However, it is unusual for a governor to forgo the formality of signing a certificate of appointment.
The Democratic governor said she refused "out of a deep and enduring respect for the will of the people." In the Nov. 7 general election, Kline received 41 percent of the vote statewide but only 35 percent in Johnson County.
"I do not believe such a clear majority of Kansans rejected Kline's stewardship as attorney general with the intention of seeing him continue a public career in law enforcement paid for by taxpayers," Sebelius said in a written statement.
Party switch
The unprecedented Kline-Morrison job switch was possible because Morrison won five terms as district attorney as a Republican, then switched parties to challenge Kline. State law gave the GOP the right to fill the district attorney vacancy, and a narrow majority of 600-plus precinct committee members chose Kline on Dec. 11.
Kline refused to comment about his appointment as district attorney. Spokesman Jan Lunsford said Kline was declining requests to be interviewed about his future. He expects to take office as district attorney Jan. 8, the day his term as attorney general ends.
Eric Rucker, Kline's chief deputy - who plans to follow Kline to Johnson County - dismissed Sebelius' comments as "cheap partisanship," noting that during his campaign Kline was endorsed by a majority of the state's sheriffs and other law enforcement groups.
Attorney Gen-eral phill kline talks to a men's group Sept. 16 at Topeka Bible Church. Gov. Kathleen Sebelius won't sign off on Kline's appointment as Johnson County district attorney, an unprecedented move that won't stop his appointment.
Before Kline's appointment, Sebelius had said Republicans should base their choice on the candidates' credentials as prosecutors, not politics. Republicans chose Kline over Steve Howe, an assistant district attorney with 18 years' experience as a prosecutor.
Kline has not served as a county prosecutor, and as attorney general, he didn't try criminal cases in district court. Morrison regularly handled his office's most high-profile criminal cases, such as the 2002 trial of John E. Robinson Sr., who was convicted of multiple murders and sentenced to death.
'Give me a break'
But Scott Schwab, the county's GOP chairman, said Sebelius was being a hypocrite, because her only reasons for not signing off on Kline's appointment were political.
"The queen of politics is telling the Republicans not to be political? Give me a break," Schwab said in an interview. "What else does she have to gain? Just sign it and get it over with."
Kline had strong support from anti-abortion activists, which was not surprising, given his longtime and vocal opposition to abortion. They also backed him in his successful two-year legal battle to obtain the records of 90 patients from two abortion clinics, including one in Overland Park operated by Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri.
Mary Kay Culp, executive director of Kansans for Life, the state's largest anti-abortion group, said Sebelius has no room to complain about Kline's appointment because she was instrumental in persuading Morrison to switch parties.
"Anybody who has a complaint should call her and complain," Culp said. "She's the one who created the job opening to begin with."
No performance doubts
Culp said she expects the criticism of Kline's appointment to die down, once "people see that he's going to do a competent job."
"The fears of him are blown way out of proportion, as far as job performance," Culp said.
Schwab said he has no doubts that Kline will be a good prosecutor, though he questions the political wisdom of the GOP's choice. For many Republicans, he said, it was a favor to Kline and a message to abortion rights activists.
"They sacrificed every political chip they had," Schwab said. "It wasn't a smart political decision at all. It was about what they personally thought was right, and they didn't care about the political consequences, which were extremely high."
Schwab said he has heard widespread criticism of the appointment.
"Am I excited that this happened? Absolutely not," he said. "Am I worried that he is going to be a lousy DA? Absolutely not."
Abortion records probe
Kline's pursuit of the abortion clinic records became a political liability when Morrison and other Kline critics portrayed it as an invasion of patients' privacy. They accused Kline of being on a fishing expedition driven by his anti-abortion views.
Sebelius, an abortion rights supporter, said, "The people of Kansas made a strong and unequivocal statement about Phill Kline's fitness for law enforcement and his pursuit of misguided, personal priorities in public office."
But Kline said repeatedly he pursued the records as part of a broader investigation into possible crimes, including illegal late-term abortions and doctors' failure to report suspected child abuse as required by law.
The clinics have repeatedly said they have committed no wrongdoing and the records contain no evidence of any crimes.
Culp said if Kline - or any prosecutor - wins a conviction against an abortion doctor, "Then there'd be some vindication."
More like this
- Kline may go after D.A. job 1 comment / December 9, 2006
- Anti-abortion group gives award to Kline December 19, 2006
- Operation Rescue names Kline its man of the year 107 comments / December 18, 2006
- GOP official questions Morrison staying 1 comment / December 21, 2007
- Kline makes plans for new job but not next election 2 comments / December 13, 2006
Top ads RSS
- Obama to promise 17% cuts in U.S. emissions in next decade November 26, 2009 · 3 comments
- At Fambrough’s urging, fans show support for KU football November 26, 2009 · 2 comments
- Quiet revolution taking place in America November 25, 2009 · 120 comments
- Holiday unites busy families November 26, 2009 · 1 comment
- Going soft? November 23, 2009 · 2 comments
- Nation has right to ask ‘why?’ November 21, 2009 · 143 comments
- Blog: How Has Obama's Stimulus Helped You? November 21, 2009 · 61 comments
- Extraordinarily grateful November 26, 2009 · 2 comments
- Stay or leave? It's business as usual for Mangino in wake of probe November 25, 2009 · 40 comments
- Turbine manufacturer passes on Lawrence site November 24, 2009 · 76 comments
- 6News video: SLT opponents gather for forum June 15, 2008
- Message warns students at Perry-Lecompton not to attend class today April 20, 2007
- Pale veggies pack plenty of nutrition December 17, 2008
- KU gobbles up Grizzlies November 26, 2009
- KU says student didn't follow proper lab procedures before exposure to toxic chemical November 25, 2009
- School district may have to tap contingency fund November 24, 2009
- Lawrence likely to land distribution center November 24, 2009
- Collins shares wealth November 26, 2009
- Kansas ranks 24th in nation when it comes to health November 24, 2009
- Dugan Arnett’s KU football notebook November 26, 2009


21 December 2006
at 8:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
just_another_bozo_on_this_bus (Anonymous) says…
Sibelius was limited in the ways she could respond in this matter, but she responded appropriately.
21 December 2006
at 9:12 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Agnostick (Anonymous) says…
While I certainly agree with concerns over Kline's incompetence, I don't think Sebelius got the message on this one.
The ONLY thing that happened on November 7 was that “clear majority of Kansans rejected Kline's stewardship as attorney general…” period. That's all we voted on. The rest of that sentence/quote from the governor is irrelevant.
Sebelius should've taken the high road on this: Held her breath, pinched her nose, and signed the paper.
If Kline performs his new job in the same way that he performed in Topeka, Johnson County voters will take care of him soon enough.
Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com
21 December 2006
at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
conservative (Anonymous) says…
I agree with Bozo on this one.
21 December 2006
at 9:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas (Anonymous) says…
http://img168.imageshack.us/img168/60…
Blah. . .
21 December 2006
at 10:10 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Agreed, the clinics do no wrong; they only kill babies by the bushel.
Approval from Sibelius is not required for Kline to hold the position and I suspect that Kline will obtain a conviction in the matter as the legal foundation on which he is basing his investigation is sound.
Thanks.
Marion.
21 December 2006
at 10:24 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
crazyks (Anonymous) says…
The clinics did nothing wrong because abortion is legal.
What part of this don't you understand?
21 December 2006
at 11:46 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Waht part of a 14 year old having been impregnated meaning that a crime has been committed do YOU not understand?
Thanks.
Marion.
21 December 2006
at 11:49 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
jonas (Anonymous) says…
If it was another 14 year old, is there a crime being committed?
/actually curious
21 December 2006
at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Under Kansas law, yes.
If an abortionist, housepainter, mechanic, slaes clerk or dogcatcher is aware of a crime having been committed and is concealing that knowledge, yet another crime has occurred.
This is the very sound basis of Kline's argument; that abortionists are failing to report such crimes as child molestation, child abuse and stauatory rape.
Kline is on good legal ground and correct on this point; it is only because the matter iinvolves baby killing that questions have arisen!
Thanks.
Marion.
21 December 2006
at 1:52 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
crazyks (Anonymous) says…
If a 14 year old girl was impregnated and had an abortion, and this constitutes a crime, then why didn't Kline EVER charge anyone with anything?
22 December 2006
at 1:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Groucho (Anonymous) says…
jonas asked if two underage persons having sex is actually a crime.
Yes, it actually is a crime for anyone to engage in sexual intercourse with a person who is under 16 years of age. See Rape, K.S.A. 21-3502(a)(2) [sex with child under 14], and Aggravated Indecent Liberties with a Child, K.S.A. 21-3504(a)(1) [sex with child 14 or more but less than 16]. One distinction though would be that if the perpetrator is under 18 years of age, the charge would be filed as a juvenile offender case rather than a criminal case.