Archive for Sunday, August 13, 2006
Pit bull amnesty convinces some owners to abide by ban
August 13, 2006
Advertisement
KANSAS CITY, KAN. — Animal control officials said 149 illegal pit bulls have been turned in or confiscated in the two weeks since the city increased its enforcement of a ban on the breed.
Mayor Joe Reardon announced July 28 that the city would temporarily waive penalties against people who turned over their pit bulls, which are illegal within city limits. The day before, a pit bull attacked 71-year-old Jimmie Mae McConnell, who later died.
The amnesty period ends today. More than two-thirds of the dogs were turned over in the first week, and animal control officials said the pace has slowed to what it was before the amnesty period.
“It’s tapered off to the point where it’s more manageable without all the extra resources,” said Capt. Henry Horn, commander of the police department’s animal control unit.
Horn said Friday that the amnesty program had successfully persuaded as many pit bull owners as possible to turn over their dogs to authorities, rather than dumping them in parks or other public places.
He also said he believes his unit has the resources to continue enforcing the city’s ban.
While those who voluntarily turned in their dogs didn’t get cited for violating the ban, owners who were identified through a telephone hot line were cited if officials could determine they owned a pit bull.
Some of the dogs have been sent to shelters for adoption, but many have been euthanized. That has attracted the anger of animal welfare groups and organizations that advocate on behalf of pit bulls, who criticize the city for not simply going after irresponsible owners.
The Mayor’s Animal Control Task Force has also criticized the city for ignoring recommendations it made 18 months ago to improve the animal control division, questioning how the city could afford to enforce the law now.
13 August 2006 at 6:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
The Animal Control Nazis of Kansas City, Kansas help perpetrate the same myths about “Pit Bulls” that you will find them spewing in Lawrence.
I called them just for grins and listened while one of the more junvenilte memebers of that force of Jack Booted Thugs explained to me how “Pit Bulls” actually have a physical mechanism to “lock” their jaws; sort of the reverse of a snake's ability to dsislocate jaws.
This is, of course, a lie and completely without foundation.
“Pit Bulls” are not even No. 1 on the nefarious “Bite Pressure” list; a figure for which no standardised test exists.
The odinacne says “the appearance” of a “pit bull”.
The Animal Control Nazis in KCK will sieze and kill your American Bulldog, your Presa Canario, a Boxer if is looks “pitty” and kill it.
One woman had to get three vets to write letters to the Nazis(As if they can read!) to get her bulldog back!
The Pitch did a good article:
http://www.pitch.com/Issues/2006-08-10/n…
Basically if the knuckle-dragging Nazis of KCK Animal Control think that your German Shepherd may have some “pit bull” in its background, they can, under the ordinance, sieze the animal and it is up to you to prove that the dog is ethnically pure!
If you cannot provide documentation, to the gas chamber goes your dog, thence to the oven!
I have it on good authority that the Lawrence version of Animal Control is watching closely to study exactly how Kansas city, Kansas is getting away with this policy and how easily it is to get folks to bring their dogs right up to the gas chamber doors.
Sort of reminds you of…………………..
Naw.
Couldn't happen here.
Thanks.
Marion.
13 August 2006 at 7:07 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Oh. You will LOVE this one!
In the telephone interview I was also informed that the ordinance covers “dangerous dogs”.
The primary way that KCK Animal Selection determines if a dog is “dangerous” is if it barks at the animal control officer who is looking at it.
One bark; the animal is selected and off to the gas chamber, regardless of breed!
Tha Animal comtrol Nazi said that Animal Control hopes to extend the ban to Rottweillers, Doberman and “a few of the other larger breeds”.
Give'em an inch…………………..
The Thug also told me of about fiften breeds which are “nothing but “pit bulls” in disguise” and will also be targeted.
Among those breeds:
English Bulldog, American Bulldog, Presa Canario, Cane Corso, English Mastiff, Neapolitan Mastiff, Tibetan Mastiff,; bascially any dog , regardless of size which has terrier, boxer, bulldog and/or what the ignorant Animal Control Nazis THINK a pit bull looks like.
A good webpage for those of you with open minds:
http://www.happypitbull.com/myths.htm
“Dangerous” “Pit Bulls”:
http://www.happypitbull.com/Photopages/p…
Mistaken IDs of “Pit Bulls”:
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/BSL/Mis…
How good are YOU at “Find The “Pit Bull”?:
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthe…
Punish the deed, not the breed.
And have at irresponsible owners while you're at it!
Thanks.
Marion.
13 August 2006 at 11:58 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
MacHeath (Anonymous) says…
All dogs are potentially dangerous. The problem is, some dogs are capable of killing you. Pit Bulls, Rotwiellers…even Airedales, which I adore.
The problem seems rapant, especially in the KC area, mostly due to owners that have no responsibility.
I wish there was a way to make owners of all dogs legally responsible for the dogs actions. If a dog kills a person, then that owner should do the time for manslaughter.
Then mabye,even Marion would turn in that pitbull in for a little weiner dog.
14 August 2006 at 7:41 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Swbsow:
According to the Thugs at Kansas City, Kansas Animal Killers, if the dog in ANY way resembles a “pit bull”, the animal is subject to warrantless siezure, immediate “euthanasia” and the owner liable for criminal prosecution.
Any of the breeds and more shown here:
http://www.understand-a-bull.com/Findthe…
are subject.
The real reason is that KCK is scared s+++less of a major lawsuit because of the 71 woman who was killed by animals which had already been reported to the Thugs and the Thugs had done nothing.
This is a purely political “feel-good” action very much akin to the “dog cull” in China.
But then, KCK is ruled by “Progressives”, so what can be expected?
Thanks.
Marion.
14 August 2006 at 8:41 a.m.
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
This comment was removed by the site staff for violation of the usage agreement.
14 August 2006 at 12:17 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
OMB is bound by inertia and incapable of calling them as he sees them.
Thanks.
Marion.
15 August 2006 at 9:58 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
OMB:
Suggested reading for YOU:
http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/…
http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/
http://www.robertringer.com/home.php
Thanks.
Marion.
15 August 2006 at 11:04 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BrianR (Anonymous) says…
It is unthinkable that these 'officials' actually expect people to 'turn in' their pets to be put to death.
What is even more shocking to me is that people are actually complying, what a gutless lot they are.
This is an act of tyranny by the City and should be met in kind.
15 August 2006 at 12:04 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BrianR (Anonymous) says…
Without (ever) going into any kind of detail, these people should be “dealt with.”
15 August 2006 at 1:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BrianR (Anonymous) says…
I wish you the best of luck. Taking a person's dog is evil in action.
I would hope that somewhere along the way, and BEFORE enacting such totalitarian laws, they've consulted Animal Control people, vets, or other experts in animal behavior and learnt that there are no intrinsically 'bad' dogs.
They could read journals, talk to 50 veterinarians or whatever it takes to get a clear, objective picture of what they're really doing. Clearly they do not or they just don't care.
Luna looks quite harmless, I hope you get her back.
15 August 2006 at 1:44 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BrianR (Anonymous) says…
E,
I didn't find a reference to it on the City site but I did write the date in my planner and will follow up.
B
15 August 2006 at 1:46 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Two comments:
1) I see enforcer is still jumping on Marion's band wagon as usual. No surprise.
2) I support this ban, although I think it will lead to even more inbreeding of the breed. I don't know how anyone can argue that they attack more than other dogs. Not going to get into it. Just my opinion. I don't like the idea of killing dogs, but like the idea of fewer pit bulls on the street. And you drama queens don't need to worry that they will eventually move on to even your little chihuahua. It won't fall out that way. Get real.
15 August 2006 at 2:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
BrianR (Anonymous) says…
There's no drama, just what happens and what doesn't happen.
**
1. “I don't know how anyone can argue that they attack more than other dogs.”
2. “I don't like the idea of killing dogs, but like the idea of fewer pit bulls on the street.”
**
How do you reconcile these two statements? Does this mean that you would also support fewer Beagles, Welsh Corgis and Boston Terriers on the streets?
We do have a (harmless) big scary-looking dog and this is an issue that could effect me and my dog.
So much for the validity of your opinion.
15 August 2006 at 2:11 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
I read it ten times, but that was to get through your terrible punctuation.
OK, so it's your bandwagon. I'm sorry about your dog. But you and Marion seem to share one brain, and unfortunately for you he must have gotten most of it.
I seem to remember someone on this forum that continually gets bashed for not having any support whatsoever for their comments. That person's name is….
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Keep scrolling
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.Keep scrolling
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
….enforcer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
15 August 2006 at 2:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
BrianR-
I like dogs thanks. Almost all of them. I don't have to reconcile my statements. No reconciliation required my friend. Your comment makes no sense. They are coming after pit bulls because pit bulls maul and kill people more than other breeds. So, don't buy one.
15 August 2006 at 2:51 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Yes, I AM assisting Enforcer in he rfight against the civil rights violations, denials of due process which she has endured, the fight against Jerry Little, City Prosecutor, have assisted her in the filing of a complaint with the Judicial Discilplinary Committee, a complaint with the Ethics Committee, all approprite filings in the matter, through the use of my FAX/SCanner/Copier, special process service, a n appeal to the Kansas Supreme Court and other such matters as assistance may be required.
Now before you “Liberals” and “Pit Bull” haters get pennies stuck in your fuse boxes and blow off, it is NOT against ANY law, canon, regulation or rule of any court for one private citizen to assit another citizen in the appropriate filings as long as the actual plaintiff does the filings and the person assisting is in no way engaging the “pracitce” of law.
Enforcer's dog has been adjudged in a manner not permitted by City Code, due process has been denied, reversible judicial errors have been made, the City Prosecutor has had a Disorderly Conduct complaint filed against him and it is my belief that Enforcer will prevail in this matter.
I will continue to assist Enforcer in this matter until she prevails.
Thanks.
Marion.
15 August 2006 at 3:19 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Marion-I applaud you for helping a friend out in need and I won't comment on her dog because I don't know the story.
What I will say is that animals need to be considered for safety reasons no matter what kind they are. Just because they are dogs, man's best friend, doesn't mean they should still be pets if they are dangerous. It's funny how people get wrapped in defending their own civil rights and ignore other's rights. They have a right to own pit bulls until it infringes on other's rights to safety and not having their face mauled off and disfigured or even killed. Kind of like the smoking ban.
You choose to do something that infringes on someone elses rights, you get restricted. Boom, can't smoke in the restuarant. Your dog infringes on my family's safety and lives, you can't own it next door to me, my kids school, my business, etc. Doesn't mean you can't smoke anywhere else you want and it doesn't mean you can't buy any other type of dog. Just restricted.
Maybe people need to start considering others before they take certain actions and they won't be disappointed later.
15 August 2006 at 6:50 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Yes, indeed, the safety of human beings is paramount.
“Pit Bulls” are no more dangerous than any other breed and no more likely to bite or attack of their own accord than any other dog.
There are so many myths; the same myths promulgated in the past and present about Rottweillers, Doberman, Malemutes, German Shepherds, Dogue de Bordeaux, Presa Canario and other types of dogs which have been used for fighting in less civilised times than those in which we live.
“Locking Jaws”!
BARF!
It is written someplace; “Thou Shalt Not P+++ Off Marion!”
I have been screwed with by professionals and have prevailed in one way or the next and will continue to prevail.
Those folks who tell you that it's not about winning or losing; it's how you play the game are LYING!
Winning is everything and all there is!
That is all there has ever been and all that there ever will be.
For many years in another life I walked daily through The Valley Of The Shadow Of Death and I did learn that in order to Fear NO Evil, one MUST become the meanest mofo in the valley and if properly provoked, I can become that selfsame.
Mess with me; my family or my friends and I am become Shiva; the Destroyer of Worlds; I am the Celt, blue of face, I am become The Berserker of Nordic legend, I am The Golem; come to protect the Ghetto, I am the Burning Man.
If Thine Eye Offends Me, I will not only take that eye but its brother as well.
I will not trade one of my teeth for one of yours but rather all of your teeth and the jaws which held them.
I become my own Covenant, Sword And Arm.
I do not forgive and never forget.
Why?
Leah, blown up in a sidewalk cafe in the Middle East may have just a bit to do with it.
The cruelties, injustices and horrors of the world, which most of you will never see have a bit to do with it.
People like myself understand that although we may lose battles, we will never lose the war.
On the other hand, if you are my freind, I will go hungry so that you might eat, I will live in a tent so that you might live in a house, I will drink urine so that you might drink water; I can be the best freind that you will ever have and if YOU choose, the worst enemy that you will ever know.
I seek and hope for only freinds.
And by the way, if I run a joint which allows smoking and you don't like smoking……stay the hell out of my joint!
Thanks.
Marion.
15 August 2006 at 7:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
I've suspected for a long time that Enforcer is a lapdog of Marion. Too often it seems as if Marion posts and then Enforcer jumps in as a 'Yes Man'.
As far as Marion's 6:50 post…. looks like someone is well into that second bottle of scotch.
15 August 2006 at 7:34 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
This is from Beatrice's post of last night in regards to Maniac…
“Marion, was one of your failed business adventures gasket manufacturing? I'm guessing that is why you now have a seemingly endless supply of gaskets, as you seem to blow one or two just about every day. Most of us can't afford to replace them that often.
Chill out already and realize that we are simply sharing our thoughts here in this modern means of conversation — kind of like being electronic pen pals with strangers. We are not here to SCREAM at one another in a completely immature manner when we don't like what someone else writes.
Besides, I can't help but to think of Woody Allen's response to someone quoting Marshall McLuhan in “Annie Hall.” Plus, McLuhan published this about 40 years ago, so it isn't like you are saying anything new. And to be yelling it? Geez. Get over yourself already.”
15 August 2006 at 8:20 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
naijagirl (Anonymous) says…
It's surprising that no one noticed (or maybe no one wants to comment) rightthinker's (a major misnomer when taken literally) and Marion's first few comments. Everytime I decide you have made a marginal attempt to redeem yourselves, you slither right back down to the bottom of that pit. That “breed”! “Ghetto Cruiser”?! Wow! I need time to recoup.
15 August 2006 at 8:23 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Niajagirl - There are some regular posters on this board who are racists. You picked a couple. Actually, they made themselves easily known.
15 August 2006 at 8:43 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Sorry, folks; not a “racist” bone in my body.
TOB:
I do not drink Scotch, nor have I been drinking.
Your problem is that you cannot handle anything but Namby-pamby and most certainly, not the truth.
Swbsow:
You forget, Dear Girl, I am the ADMIN of that “other site” and have access to the weblogs.
Naijagirl:
“Ghetto Cruiser” is a slang or dialectical term applied to certain types of automobiles.
It is NOT a “racist” term!
OMB:
You want “bile”?
I can show you “bile”.
Your problem is that any “bile” that I would show you would be so subtle that it would go right past your narro Pseudo-liberal/Neo-socialist mind; if it might be called that.
Further, I suspect that you are incapable of passion, commitment, dedication and integrity.
Swbpig:
I will “scream” at anyone I wish in order to get their attention, drive home a point or to clearly demonstrate that the object of the volume is an irrecoverable idiot.
swbpig:
YO!
Beatch!
You got a “scroll” and a “back” feature on your box?
If you do not like my posts, do not read my posts.
Now one is twisting you little pink tail.
Thanks.
Marion.
15 August 2006 at 9:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
“I once had some of that “breed” crunch me the rear of an old Dodge 4 dr 1 ton that had a very large trailer coupler on the back.” Marion Sydney Lynn
No one was talking about ghetto crusier. Racist.
––––
swbsow - Good lord. All he does is trick people to go to his site so he can rack up hits for advertisements. Of which, you shall notice since you got there, he has very few.
15 August 2006 at 9:21 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
TOB:
I recieve not a farthing or a threp'ny bit for the links I have put up on my site.
Those links are there because those folks are my friends and I make nothing from webhits.
As it happens, I do shop at The Merc now and again.
What will you do if I link to The Merc website?
I'll get that done tomorrow and we'll find out!
swbsow:
You are a lying sack of poo-poo.
You have been on RCT for some time.
RCT “captures” no more information about participants than other websites and a lot less than most.
I normally just delete the weblogs as I don't care for the most part but when I get a whacko working the site, I will look around.
You is worth watching.
Thanks.
Marion.
15 August 2006 at 9:33 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
naijagirl (Anonymous) says…
I remember mentioning a month or so ago that empty barrels make the loudest noise. Hence the constant yapping from Marion's corner of the yard.
rightthinker referred to the “breed down in the heart of KCK that should be on that list.” Please let me know how else to interpret that. And then explain how you agreeing with him and providing further justification for the elimination of this “breed” is not racist. What frightens me is that people like you masquerade as upstanding members of society. You could be my neighbour. Ick!
15 August 2006 at 10:16 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
swbpig:
One either supports Free Speech or one does not.
The purpose of the First Amendment is not to protect “popular” speech but that which is unpopular!
Unless a post contains a very specific call to illegal action I will not censor that board.
I would not even censor you.
Thanks.
Marion.
16 August 2006 at 9:06 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Agnostick (Anonymous) says…
I applaud the efforts of KC officials to remove dangerous pit bulls from residential areas where they are not properly enclosed, caged, maintained etc. If the owners of these dogs are not going to take proper care and responsibility of that property, then they forfeit their rights to said property. “Rights” and “responsibility” go hand-in-hand.
Here's another interesting aspect of all this. This isn't government; this is business.
http://www.cbc.ca/story/canada/national/…
http://www.bankrate.com/brm/news/insuran…
http://www.mostchoice.com/news-3650-new-…
In the community where I live, it is illegal to own a pit bull, Staffordshire terrier, or other related breeds. When I see one of these dogs, I whip out the cell phone and call it in.
Thanks
Agnostick
agnostick@excite.com
16 August 2006 at 9:30 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Hey Snippy! I'm the one that called you labdog to that racist scumsucker, Marion Sydney Lynn.
I still can't believe the LJW is allowing his and rightthinker's overtly racist comments to remain on this thread. I suppose it means the LJW condones that type of nonsense.
16 August 2006 at 9:42 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Well, I already knew that I did not agree with 99% of Marion's comments, but that just jumped up and over the century mark with these current posts! I dub thee “Sir Schmuck”, aka “Sir Head-Up-His-Arse”! I know you are entitled to your opinion, I just hope you keep it to yourself more often than not.
16 August 2006 at 9:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Posted by The_Original_Bob (anonymous) on August 16, 2006 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Snippy! I'm the one that called you labdog to that racist scumsucker, Marion Sydney Lynn.
********************************************
Sounds like they need to ban lapdogs now!!!
16 August 2006 at 9:53 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
I still cahllenge you to find and reprint my “racist” comments.
I have made this challenge several times on this forum and no one has chosen to meet it!
Why?
Because I do not make “racist” comments, that's why!
If you think otherwise, dig up those comments which you believe to be “racist” and I will deal with your cahllenge.
In the meantime, the challenge stands.
Thanks.
Marion.
16 August 2006 at 10:03 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
“I once had some of that “breed” crunch me the rear of an old Dodge 4 dr 1 ton that had a very large trailer coupler on the back.” Marion Sydney Lynn
Now, get that shovel you use, and start digging a deeper hole explaining how referring to black people as a “breed” is not racist. This ought to be pure entertainment.
16 August 2006 at 10:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Come on in, Enforcer!!! Back your boy up!!! You were a little slow today. 3 minutes????
16 August 2006 at 10:37 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
TOB wrote:
“Posted by The_Original_Bob (anonymous) on August 16, 2006 at 10:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
“I once had some of that “breed” crunch me the rear of an old Dodge 4 dr 1 ton that had a very large trailer coupler on the back.” Marion Sydney Lynn
Now, get that shovel you use, and start digging a deeper hole explaining how referring to black people as a “breed” is not racist. This ought to be pure entertainment.”
Marion writes:
I did not write that post about “black people”.
Further the term “breed” used in connection with specific groups or individuals falls well within the guidelines of acceptable use of the language without any “racist” implications.
I give you the following phrases:
“A new breed of man/woman…”
“A special breed of man/woman…”
“It takes an unusual breed of man/woman to…..”
Evidently the term “breed” may be used only under very certain and specific circumstances, according to you folks!
NOW………………………………………………….
If I had written, “I'se drivin' in my four-door lac-lac-wanna-be-Dodge when five n+++a homies tried to play Ghetto 500 in they pimped-up short” or the like, you might have found something that you could concieveably term “racist” in that post.
I did not write that.
Further, the term “Ghetto Cruiser” is a term which applies to automobiles, not people and has itself morphed into the term “Cruiser”; a description used by many ethnic groups in a quite complimentary manner.
“Ghetto Cruiser” originated in the late sixties and early seventies as the result of customising cars into a very specific configuration; contintental kits, padded vinyl tops, mohair interiors, fake sidepipes; I refer you to the first of these cars, 1957 Chevy El Morroco:
http://www.car-nection.com/yann/Dbas_txt…
The Cadillac Fleetwood Brougham Talisman was a factory-built response to this trend:
http://www.libertysoftware.be/cml/mycars…
Here you may notice the E7G Classics conversion of the El Dorado into what is termed a “pimpmobile”; yet another term without “racist” connotation:
http://www.libertysoftware.be/cml/mycars…
In point of fact, such cars were indeed favoured by pimps and drug dealers of all ethnic groups in the 60s and 70s and to some extent, still are:
http://www.libertysoftware.be/cml/mycars…
NOW………………………..
“Would you like to play a game, Dave?”
I'll let you go for three out of five!
Thanks.
Marion.
16 August 2006 at 10:44 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Dig deeper Old Man!!!
16 August 2006 at 10:56 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Ooops!
E&G conversion:
http://www.car-nection.com/cadillacdatab…
How many “racist” terms can you find here?:
http://mangans.blogspot.com/2004/03/cadi…
“Pimpmobile” definitions:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph…
“Ghetto Cruiser” definitions:
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph…
You people need to get over your “White Guilt” and get lives!
Thanks.
Marion.
16 August 2006 at 10:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Marion writes:
I did not write that post about “black people”.
Further the term “breed” used in connection with specific groups or individuals falls well within the guidelines of acceptable use of the language without any “racist” implications.
*******************************************
I'm totally not buying that truckload of shiz you just dropped, Marion. Please point us in the direction of where we can find this list of acceptable uses of language.
I don't think the ghetto cruiser referenence was the primary offense. I, myself, don't believe that has racial connotations to it, but rather speaks of certain styles of cars as you describe. I think the reference to breed was the offender, and rightly so. I see an undercurrent in your postings that lead me to believe the intent of your comment was out of line, especially when you turn right around and throw down some wanna-be ebonics type words.
…and here comes enforcer to the (pitiful attempt of a) rescue
16 August 2006 at 11:09 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
pitiful, and irrelevant
16 August 2006 at 11:11 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
pitiful, and irrelevant (was to enforcer)
I'm seeing a nice lack of response time from these two this morning. Maybe enforcer needs to get her hands out of Marion's shorts so she can type with two hands and Marion can pay attention.
16 August 2006 at 11:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
Wow. Enforcer has hopped in the hole with Marion. Makes sense.
16 August 2006 at 11:14 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
I'm seeing an attempt at diversion by enforcer from Marion to lame poetry, but whatever. The damage has been done. Marion opened his mouth and spewed forth crap and it is forever emblazened in his posts here. No need to argue, it is now in the printed form.
16 August 2006 at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
lame
16 August 2006 at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
pathetic
16 August 2006 at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
weak
16 August 2006 at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
enforcer
16 August 2006 at 11:16 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Marion's words
16 August 2006 at 11:25 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
I see these two as the type of people that would go out and run into each other in their cars as a scheme to get insurance money.
I see it now~~~~~~~goes into dream sequence-
Marion and enforcer driving through the Merc parking lot in their respective ghetto cruisers. Marion has a picture of himself strapped into the passenger seat and an “RCT” magnet on the side of the doors. enforcer has a blow up passenger strapped into her front seat to ward off attackers since she can't take care of herself, and a big mean dog in the back seat trying drooling over the sight of the elderly woman in the next car.
Next thing, smacko!!!!!! What a surprise they crash into each other! Marion says, “Oh, my back”! enforcer says, “Oh, my head”! $$$$ flows in from insurance. Marion spends his paying people to read his website and enforcer buys another dog and some more lube.
16 August 2006 at 11:26 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
yeah, I could swb, but I'm not feeling poetic. Felt like writing a short narrative instead.
16 August 2006 at 11:31 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Agnostick (Anonymous) says…
Dogs? What dogs?
16 August 2006 at 11:35 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
You are out of it enforcer. Where did anyone claim to know anything about poetry. Truly a world class moron! Give me your address and I'll send you a trophy!
16 August 2006 at 11:45 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Come back when you have something to add, enforcer. The problem with puzzles constructed by idiots is that they cut the pieces independently of each other and none of them fit together to form anything comprehensible.
I see Marion has no further justification or explanation for “breed”. Too bad. I am truly sad for bigots. What a sad life to have.
16 August 2006 at 11:47 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
A lost cause when someone is exposed as racist is when a white person says, “But, I have black friends.” Apparently, “I can cut and past poetry from black poets,” is as close as Enforcer can get.
16 August 2006 at 11:48 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
The_Original_Bob (Anonymous) says…
And, no, I can't spell. cut and paste.
16 August 2006 at 11:57 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
powershopper (Anonymous) says…
enforcer: You truly are an idiot. The voice of the poems you just cut and pasted are meant to embody the black experience through the voice of people who have lived it. These authors aren't promoting any type of stereotype or stating it is okay but telling a story of the black experience. Something you obviously don't know too much about. You have totally misinterpreted the meaning of these poems. Further more, perhaps you should spend some time learning how to spell Maya Angelou. At least then you would be able to find her books in the library.
16 August 2006 at 11:59 a.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Posted by swbsow (anonymous) on August 16, 2006 at 11:52 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I've got it! The pattern here is that Enforcer has cut & pasted black poetry in reverse alphabetical order based on the poets' last names.
Very clever, Enforcer. I applaud your brillance!
*********************************************
I hope your applause is only that of a one-armed man, because enforcer doesn't deserve more than that.
16 August 2006 at 12:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Whoa, wait! I was so wrapped up in all of these great poetic postings and life lessons form enforcer that I totally forgot Marion made a bigoted remark.
Not really. Come on back, Marion, and try another attempt at justifying “breed”.
16 August 2006 at 12:02 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
daddax98 (Anonymous) says…
powershopper you hit it on the head
16 August 2006 at 12:03 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Have we lost focus of the topic here? That pit bulls are bad? How could enforcer forget about the topic of dogs when hers is sitting at her side? Oh wait, it isn't anymore. hehe.
16 August 2006 at 12:08 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
powershopper (Anonymous) says…
Thanks Daddax98. Enforcer never ceases to amaze me with her ignorance. I am amazed she is using a Maya Angelou poem to endorse racism. Good god!
Marion is actually a very intelligent person and says things to just ruffle peoples feathers. I don't believe he truly is racist. He is more of an agitator and has received the reaction he intended. Enforcer on the other hand is so dumb that she actually thinks Marion is being serious.
16 August 2006 at 12:10 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
powershopper (Anonymous) says…
I don't believe in tact. I prefer to get right to the point. In this case, you are a racist pig.
16 August 2006 at 12:14 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
powershopper (Anonymous) says…
Can you please enlighten us as to why you posted the poetry?
16 August 2006 at 12:15 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
i_have_only_valid_opinions (Anonymous) says…
Powershopper, I understand that Marion stirs the pot just to see the reaction. But, you still have to call him out for his comments. And I agree about enforcer. She needs to ride the short bus to the ward for another round of electroshock therapy.
16 August 2006 at 12:26 p.m.
Suggest removal
Permalink
Marion (Marion Lynn) says…
Having successfully disposed of the issue of “racism”, I am now confronted with being “uncomplimentary”!
How quaint.
To set the record straight, if any of thought that I had anything “complimentary” to say about a gold plated, twice-piped, metal flake painted, low-ridin' '78 Chevy Caprice full of scrub-wearin', shower cap capped, bejewelled of the teeth, junior achievement gansta wannbes, please disabuse yourselves of that notion right away!
OK.
Is it “racist” or is it “uncomplimentary”?
Round Three; now for three out of five.
I am 2.
You all are 0.
Ladies and Gentlemen!
Start your engines!
Thanks.
Marion.
16 August 2006 at 12:28 p.m.
Suggest removal