Letter from the chancellor to KU staffers / LJWorld.com

Archive for Tuesday, September 27, 2005

September 27, 2005

Dear Colleagues:

Six years ago the Chronicle of Higher Education published a column I wrote on the evolution controversy (http://rnaworld.bio.ku.edu/evolve/compare/statement/chancellors_statement.html). My point of view then, and remarks I have made publicly many times since, should surprise no one: Evolution is the central unifying principle of modern biology, and it must be taught in our high schools, universities and colleges. On a personal level, I see no contradiction in being a person of faith who believes in God and evolution, and I'm sure many others at this university agree.

But the attack on evolution continues across America and compels me to again state the obvious: The University of Kansas is a major public research university, a scientific community. We are committed to fac! t-based research and teaching. As an academic, scientific community, we must affirm scientific principles.

The university's position is not an attack on anyone. We respect the right of the individual to his or her beliefs, including faith-based beliefs about creation. However, creationism and intelligent design are most appropriately taught in a religion, philosophy, or sociology class, rather than a science class.

I encourage students, faculty and staff to take the opportunity to see the "Explore Evolution" exhibit that will open November 1 at the KU Natural History Museum and Biodiversity Center at Dyche Hall. The exhibit focuses on seven contemporary research projects that contribute to our knowledge of evolution in creatures large and small, from a study of farmer ants to an analysis of the fossils of whales. A grant from the National Science Foundation funded six museums to create the exhibit. I applaud our Natural History Museum for partnering in this project ! along with the Science Museum of Minnesota and the natural history museums at the universities of Michigan, Oklahoma, Nebraska, and Texas.

The United States cannot accept efforts to undermine the teaching of science. Our focus should be to raise the level of scientific literacy among our citizenry because we face a critical shortage of scientists in the next two decades. As a public research university, we have a special mission to educate tomorrow's scientists and to support the science teachers who will inspire young people to become chemists, geologists, biologists and physicists. Let us use the evolution controversy to intensify our efforts to provide a world-class education to our students and to support the faculty who engage in the important research and teaching missions of our schools and universities.

Sincerely,

Bob Hemenway

Chancellor

Discussion

LJWorld.com doesn't necessarily condone the comments here, nor does it review every post.
Read our full policy. Also, read about banned accounts and harassing comments.

27 September 2005
at 7:23 a.m.

Suggest removal

Permalink

devobrun (Anonymous) says…

Oh no, yet another man of authority referring to “central unifying principle of modern biology”. Come on young people, march on the university, protest, question authority. Neither creation nor evolution hold the grail of science. The arrogance of the biologist is quickly exceeding that of the church.
Bartholomew (sp?) ruled that Galileo was a heretic and the Pope put the hammer down on him. So, now the chancellor rules that evolution is “fact”. Will he entertain the possibility that evolution is not “fact”? Facts are for philosophers who have become rigid in thought.
Bilologists, please stop insisting that macro-evolution is a scientifically testable theory that is required for belief in the rest of biological sciences. Leave it. It does you harm, not good.
As for creationism, wow what a convenient straw-man. The religious folks set him up for the biologists to knock down. Teach neither as science. They are both theology.