Archive for Friday, January 14, 2005

Judge: Evolution disclaimers violate church-state separation

January 14, 2005


— A federal judge Thursday ordered a suburban Atlanta school system to remove stickers from its high school biology textbooks that call evolution "a theory, not a fact," saying the disclaimers are an unconstitutional endorsement of religion.

"By denigrating evolution, the school board appears to be endorsing the well-known prevailing alternative theory, creationism or variations thereof, even though the sticker does not specifically reference any alternative theories," U.S. District Judge Clarence Cooper said.

The stickers were put inside the books' front covers by public school officials in Cobb County in 2002. They read: "This textbook contains material on evolution. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, studied carefully and critically considered."

"This is a great day for Cobb County students," said Michael Manely, an attorney for the parents who sued over the stickers. "They're going to be permitted to learn science unadulterated by religious dogma."

In a statement, the school board said it was disappointed by the ruling and will decide whether to appeal. A board spokesman said no decision had been made on when, or if, the stickers would be removed.

"The textbook stickers are a reasonable and evenhanded guide to science instruction and encouraging students to be critical thinkers," the board said.

The stickers were added after more than 2,000 parents complained that the textbooks presented evolution as fact, without mentioning rival ideas about the beginnings of life, such as the biblical story of creation.

Six parents and the American Civil Liberties Union then sued, contending the disclaimers violated the separation of church and state and unfairly singled out evolution from thousands of other scientific theories as suspect.

At a trial in federal court in November, the school system defended the stickers as a show of tolerance, not religious activism.

"Science and religion are related and they're not mutually exclusive," school district attorney Linwood Gunn said. "This sticker was an effort to get past that conflict and to teach good science."

But the judge disagreed: "While evolution is subject to criticism, particularly with respect to the mechanism by which it occurred, the sticker misleads students regarding the significance and value of evolution in the scientific community."

The case is one of several battles waged around the country in recent years over what role evolution should play in the teaching of science.

Last year, Georgia's education chief proposed a science curriculum that dropped the word "evolution" in favor of "changes over time." The idea was dropped amid protests from teachers.

A school district in Dover, Pa., has been locked in a dispute over a requirement that science students be told about "intelligent design" -- the concept that the universe is so complex it must have been created by some higher power.

Current science education standards in Kansas treat evolution as among a few key subjects students must grasp.A committee has been rewriting the state science education standards. Dissenting members of the science standards writing committee sent a letter in December to State Board of Education members.The letter says the dissenters believe evolutionary theory should be taught but that a draft of the science standards revisions implicitly discourages critical analysis of it.The dissenters say they do not think schools should be required to teach intelligent design, the notion that the Earth was created by a series of intelligent happenings, not random chance. They suggest teachers "should be allowed to address scientific alternatives at their own discretion."The current science standards were written in 2001 after a moderate State Board of Education majority took control and reversed a 1999 decision to de-emphasize evolution.Conservatives on the board gained a 6-4 majority in 2004 elections; that majority took office Tuesday.

Commenting has been disabled for this item.