Advertisement

Archive for Saturday, December 24, 2005

Deal would be record for city

For proposed $58M overhaul, Berry Plastics wants historic tax break

December 24, 2005

Advertisement

Berry Plastics Corp. is prepared to make the largest industrial investment in Lawrence history - provided it also receives the largest tax break ever sought from the city.

Berry, the parent company of Packerware Corp. in Lawrence, is seeking a 90 percent tax break on $58 million in investments being considered for Packerware's plastics plant in Lawrence.

The project would allow Packerware to use less plastic when making its millions of drink cups, kitchenware, garden tools and other products - $79.4 million worth last year - at the plant founded in town 37 years ago, with help from the city's first-ever tax abatement.

Let the high-stakes negotiations begin.

"I want to emphasize it's an exciting possibility, and I want to do everything I can to work with the company, but the 90 percent being requested is not necessarily the final number," Mayor Boog Highberger said.

Berry officials, meanwhile, said that their request was essential for making the Lawrence project a reality - a project that would add dozens of jobs and bring state-of-the-art equipment to an operation that already covers 470,000 square feet and employs 450 people.


Berry Plastics, Packerware's parent company, is looking to make an investment of $58 million in the Lawrence Packerware plant.

Berry Plastics, Packerware's parent company, is looking to make an investment of $58 million in the Lawrence Packerware plant.

While the 90 percent number is not an ultimatum, it would solidify Lawrence's standing among an internal competition for the project among other Berry plants, said Brent Beeler, Berry's chief operating officer. The company has 23 other plants in the United States, plus one each in England, Italy and Mexico City.

"We haven't officially picked Lawrence yet," Beeler said. "We are considering Lawrence. It's one of the few that we're narrowing it down to, but certainly Lawrence would be a great spot for us. We certainly like the work force in Lawrence, and we like the location. And it's really an expansion of our current packaging business. :

"There is no ultimatum. We expect a fair proposal and we will be fair in our response."

Five years, 154 jobs

City officials received Berry's formal application Friday, a day after the company announced that Lawrence was in the running for a "major expansion" that could begin production in the third quarter of next year. The company would add 78 jobs and spend $58 million on building improvements and equipment upgrades, all within three years.

The application included more details:

¢ A total of 76 jobs would be anticipated to be added during the fourth and fifth years of the project, bringing the total to 154.

¢ New jobs would range from equipment operators to department heads, with hourly wages from $10.50 to $35. The average wage would be $13.21 in year three and $13.19 in year five, and the total annual payroll created by the project would be $2.14 million in year three and $4.23 million in year five.

The information formally will be received by commissioners as early as Tuesday, but more likely Jan. 3, Highberger said.

Commissioners will be expected to forward the material to the city's Public Incentives Review Committee, whose members then would order a cost-benefit analysis to be conducted by the Policy Research Institute at Kansas University.

The analysis would compare the expected benefits of the investment - more jobs, increased spending, more business for suppliers, etc. - against the anticipated costs of the project, such as increased demands for police protection, road repairs and new schools.

'There's a threshold'

Highberger said that while the preliminary numbers looked good, a decision couldn't come until all factors have been considered.

"We're looking at 78 jobs at a living wage or better, and that will be a great thing for the community," said Highberger, chairman of the review committee. "We just need to work out a deal that's beneficial for the company and fair to the community at the same time. :

"There's a threshold, and I want to make sure that the abatement that we grant to Berry is a benefit to the community on a long-term basis."

Tax abatements have faced increased scrutiny in recent months, as officials have criticized companies whose plans to boost employment haven't lived up to promises made when abatements were granted.

But Highberger noted that the past four years have been difficult in corporate America, in the wake of the 9-11 terror attacks, and that Berry's plans to expand in Lawrence had a "high probability" of becoming reality.

"I think we will work out a deal that's acceptable to the company and to the community, and that it will pass," he said. "I think we can do it. I will make sure that the city cooperates to the best of its ability."

Beeler said that the project would bring new "thermoform" equipment to the Lawrence plant at 2330 Packer Road, allowing Packerware to join two other Berry plants - one at Berry headquarters in Evansville, Ind., and another in Chicago - to have the industry's latest and most efficient technology.

Other options available

Berry hasn't made a similar application for tax breaks in other communities, or at least not yet.

"We have quite a few options available to us," Beeler said. "I really don't want to go into all the spots we're looking at, but we're getting it narrowed down, let's put it that way. We are finalizing other plans similar to Lawrence."

Granting the tax abatement would continue a mutually beneficial relationship between Lawrence and Packerware, Beeler said. Berry bought Packerware in 1997.

"It'd be a long-term commitment to Berry Plastics, with world-class technology," he said.

Comments

Marion Lynn 8 years, 3 months ago

The link will take you to an example of how out of control the situation is in this city.

Judgge Randy McGrath has ordered the killing of a dog which has not bitten or inured anyone:

http://www.rivercitytalk.com/RCT/showthread.php?t=186

Thanks.

Marion.

0

Marion Lynn 8 years, 3 months ago

Merry Christmas and best wishes to all in the coming New Year!

From:

Kiki, Lizzie, Spike, Chopper, Luna,The Jailbird Dog(Still being held for escaping and under DEATH PENALTY BY RANDY MCGRATH!) Ben and all at:

RiverCityTalk.com

Thanks.

Marion.

0

Godot 8 years, 3 months ago

Arminius,

I'm not sure Boog is a socialist. He is a wierd life form that has evolved as the result of an anarchist who set out to change the system from within, becoming an enforcer of laws he does not respect as a state employed attorney, and the creator of ridiculous laws as a mayor. In honor of the coming new year of Dada in Lawrence, I coin a bew term to describe Boog: socialanachrist.

Merry Christmas!

0

bill_priff 8 years, 3 months ago

Arminius - the only nonsense I see is your analysis of the situation. They haven't even run the numbers yet. Why don't we wait and see whether "the deal" is worth taking? Isn't that the way that the system is supposed to work?

I know it is much easier for the chamber to decide how much of a break the company should get and then have it rubber stamped by "their" commission, but that is not how we do it any more.

0

Arminius 8 years, 3 months ago

Godot:

Packerware can easily pick up its entire operation in Lawrence and relocate it amongst other Berry facilities in the U.S. and abroad.

The wages discussed meet the city's living-wage requirements. In addition, Packerware has been known to offer a great deal of overtime opportunities, so these will be good paying jobs in relation to the skills required.

My concern is the current city commission is dominated by socialists who are likely to blow this deal. Highberger doesn't need to proclaim a month of nonsense--we have had more than two years straight of nonsense from city hall.

0

Godot 8 years, 3 months ago

Are we prepared to lose Packerware altogether if this doesn't go through?

To Corporatesleaze who wrote: "does the community really want to attract the worker/citizen that can only be employed in poverty level jobs? That's reality-- everybody knows that."

This community doesn't need to "attract" those "citizens;" it grows its own. And they need a place to work.

0

Richard Heckler 8 years, 3 months ago

Lawrence needs tons of $22.50 up per hour office and high tech jobs. Lawrence does education well so why not look into the area of say building a Junior College/Vo-Tech Campus. Not everyone wants to or can do a 4 year college such as KU.

The sports complex will not create high paying positions.

0

moveforward 8 years, 3 months ago

We have enough corporate welfare. This is an unrealistic request from a mederately disirable company. How dedicated of a corporate citizen are they? How much do they contribute to the viability of the city? Do we need more low income jobs in Lawrence?

0

classclown 8 years, 3 months ago

If they don't pay their taxes, who will?

0

Richard Heckler 8 years, 3 months ago

90% is a bit much. How much is each citizen prepared to kick in to make up the difference?

0

offtotheright 8 years, 3 months ago

Packer employs mostly mexicans!

0

lunacydetector 8 years, 3 months ago

if the city commission blows this deal by not allowing this expansion, they will blow any chances of ever being re-elected again.

we'll just have to wait and see how much the commission really loves lawrence, and which way their policy research institute cronies decide to work their magic numbers -by the way, who pays for the study?

0

smitty 8 years, 3 months ago

lead inBerry Plastics Corp. is prepared to make the largest industrial investment in Lawrence history - provided it also receives the largest tax break ever sought from the city.

Does the tax abatement mean that the mimimum salary jobs for the Cottonwood programs will still operate for Packers low skill jobs? That's the program where Cottonwood recieves a work grant and then employs off the street citizens to do the work at the federal minimum wage, an amount lower than the positions would be paid otherwise.

Don't know if Packer and Cottonwood are still doing this but this situation has existed in the past.

No tax abatement if this loop hole can exist is my opinion.

0

corporate_sleaze 8 years, 3 months ago

The projections for new jobs are grossly overstated and will never happen-- everybody knows that.

The majority of current and future projected jobs are under $25,000.00 a year, an extremely low (poverty level) income in 2005-- everybody knows that.

This may sound like a harsh judgement, but does the community really want to attract the worker/citizen that can only be employed in poverty level jobs? That's reality-- everybody knows that.

Finally, the city officials will cave in-- everybody knows that.

0

Commenting has been disabled for this item.