Advertisement

Lawrence and Douglas County

Lawrence and Douglas county

Kline: Alito likely to be key in death penalty case

December 2, 2005

Advertisement

— Atty. Gen. Phill Kline said Thursday he may need U.S. Supreme Court nominee Samuel Alito on the court to successfully defend the Kansas death penalty.

"Quite honestly we are arguing to try to survive another day," Kline said.

Kline will defend the state's death penalty statute before the U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday.

The Kansas Supreme Court struck down the law, saying it was unconstitutional because juries weighed evidence in the penalty phase of capital murder trials in a way that favored death sentences.

The complex legal issues have been made even more complicated by the situation on the U.S. Supreme Court.

Justice Sandra Day O'Connor announced her intention to retire, but when Chief Justice William Rehnquist died in September, she was forced to say on the court until another member was seated.

President Bush's nominee Alito, a judge on the Philadelphia-based 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, is expected to face a rigorous Senate confirmation process.

O'Connor is often a swing vote in 5-4 decisions, but if she is off the court before a decision is handed down in the Kansas case, Kline may have a 4-4 tie, he said. Traditionally, ties made when a new justice is coming on board are re-argued, he said.

"If Justice O'Connor is the swing vote and the court does not announce its decision before Justice Alito is confirmed, her vote will not count," Kline said.

Others involved or observing the case confirmed that Kline may be right.

"The problems of Justice O'Connor's position are certainly significant on any close case," said Washburn University law professor Bill Rich.

Rich added, "The court on death penalty cases has frequently been divided 5-4, and Justice O'Connor has been a key swing vote, and more recently has been voting to limit the application of the death penalty."

He said the court's deliberations on the Kansas case could take months, certainly longer than it may take to get a replacement on the court.

If all tie cases are re-argued, Alito, or whoever is the new justice, will "really be put under the spotlight," he said.

Donna Schneweis, coordinator of the Kansas Coalition Against the Death Penalty, said there were numerous ways the case could be determined, including a ruling that the U.S. Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over the state issue.

"There are so many variables in this, it's really hard to know which way it will go," she said.

"It will just be another legal dilemma in our state's death penalty history. Depending on how the decision goes, it's entirely possible that there will continue to be litigation related to this case for some time," she said.

Comments

Baille 9 years ago

You know for one who believes that thepurposes of law is to uphold and reinforce the "sanctity of life" Kline is pushing pretty hard to use bad law to kill people.

The fact is the legislature knew this was a bad law back in Kleypas when they agreed to not enforce the law as written, but to enforce it is it surely was meant to be. Even though nominally opposed to "activist courts" Kline went along with this legal fiction and continues to vigorously argue for it so that he and the State can continue to kill people in cold blood. Nice, huh?

http://www.kscourts.org/kscases/ojasumm/2001/20011228.htm

christie 9 years ago

Why doesn't the State of Kansas adopt Policy for the Death Penalty modeled after another State? Why does the State of Kansas have to be different, and potentially incorrect.

I say correct the Law if it needs correcting and get on with the business of executing (not killing) those who deserve it, and the sooner the better.

Baille 9 years ago

How do you execute someone without killing them?

Commenting has been disabled for this item.