St. Louis ? Why wasn’t I born rich instead of handsome? Or so the lament goes.

But an office of the nation’s central bank now says that if you’re gorgeous, chances are better that you will get paid more than plain folks.

Analysis by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis suggests that good-looking people tend to make more money and get promoted more often than those with average looks. The analysis is published in the April edition of The Regional Economist, the Fed’s quarterly magazine.

Research analyst Kristie Engemann and economist Michael Owyang looked at the possible link between appearance and wages by evaluating previous surveys and research. Their conclusion: It helps to be tall, slender and attractive.

Less clear was whether the less attractive are victims of bias, or if good-looking people tend to develop self-confidence and social skills that simply enhance their marketability.

“It doesn’t seem like anti-discrimination laws, even if you enforce them strictly, would be a magic bullet,” Owyang said.

The researchers cited one study that found a “plainness penalty” of 9 percent in wages — meaning a person with below-average looks tended to earn 9 percent less than those with average looks — and a “beauty premium” of 5 percent.

A study concerning weight showed that women who were obese earned 17 percent lower wages than women of average weight.

Height matters, too. One study looked at the height of 16-year-olds and the wages they earned later as adults. The taller teens went on to earn an average of 2.6 percent more per additional inch of height.

On the Street: Do you think people who are tall, slender and attractive earn more money?

The researchers also cited a survey showing that the average chief executive is 3 inches taller than the average man. While a typical American male stands 5-foot-9, one-third of CEOs are 6-foot-2.