9-11 families to face new test as federal lobbyists

? After three years of angry advocacy, the families of Sept. 11 victims have achieved a rare position of influence over policy-makers, but they are about to face their toughest political test yet.

They goaded officials into creating a bipartisan commission to investigate lapses leading up to the attacks, and then helped the panel win cooperation from recalcitrant agencies and greater access to classified documents. After the commission urged sweeping changes in how intelligence agencies are run, one family group even established a Web site to monitor the progress of the proposals.

“I know I will continue to remain active because it’s the only thing I can do to make sure my mom’s murder was not in vain,” said Carie Lemack, whose mother, Judy Larocque, died aboard American Airlines Flight 11, which was flown into the World Trade Center.

While no elected official wants to be seen as thwarting their will, Larocque and other activist family members in coming weeks will have to advocate before lawmakers and administration officials keenly focused on the Nov. 2 election.

Rep. Sherwood Boehlert, R-N.Y., who said pressure from the families already had spurred positive reforms within the FBI and elsewhere in government, said he believed the intensity of the election season likely would delay legislative passage.

“One side wants to do everything immediately, and others are saying go slow, which could be a code word for not doing very much,” Boehlert said. “I think it’s doable, but I think it will probably be done in a lame duck session.”

The proposed alterations would dramatically change the power structure in certain parts of Washington, particularly the Pentagon, which currently controls most of the government’s intelligence spending. On Wednesday, President Bush offered legislation that would create a new intelligence director post with authority for 75 percent of the budget.

Kristen Breitweiser, right, whose husband, Ron, died in the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks at the World Trade Center, joins other family members of the victims during a hearing by the Senate Governmental Affairs Committee Aug. 17 on Capitol Hill in Washington.

“We’ve seen over the past year that we can make waves,” said Chris Burke, who lost his younger brother Tom at the World Trade Center.

At the same time, Burke, of Glen Head, N.Y., said he worried that the most outspoken family members may be rushing the process too fast. “I don’t know that the 9-11 families are the coolest heads in town. These are people who are motivated by the best intentions, but they’re also motivated by a degree of anger and bitterness which can cloud judgment,” he said.

The family members could also see their clout diminish over time, said Victoria Cummock, who has been waging similar battles for more than 10 years.

Cummock’s husband died when a bomb exploded aboard Pam Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, in 1988.

She, too, became an advocate. A mother of three living in Boca Raton, Fla., Cummock spent tens of thousands of dollars of her own money pressing lawmakers to act. She testified before 28 congressional committees and served on a commission to improve security. But she’s still not satisfied.

“I always thought if the there was something wrong, the government was there to fix it for us,” she said. “I was so naive.”

Her advice to the families: “Get in there and scream as much as you possibly can.”